|
「株式会社くればぁ」さんが気に入ったので、自衛も兼ねて「放射能吸着除去メッシュ」を入手しました。
これから何回かに別けて、色んな使い方を記事にしていきたいと思います。 関連記事
→放射性物質防御マスク http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spa_fullcolors/4646511.html →放射能吸着除去メッシュの株式会社くればぁ その１ http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spa_fullcolors/5100646.html →放射能吸着除去メッシュの株式会社くればぁ その２ http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spa_fullcolors/5323503.html →放射能吸着除去メッシュの株式会社くればぁ その３ http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spa_fullcolors/5628055.html 箱と中身（右側のペットボトルはメッシュではありませんｗ。大きさを見るための比較対象です）  製品のアップ
 触ってみると「メッシュ」というより、厚手の不織布という感じです。
口に当てても普通に呼吸できますが、建築士さんのサイト（http://sites.google.com/site/forum11380770/report-publication-1/oshirase/jinjiripotofangshenenghuafenfirutamesshuwanghu）にあったように、網戸につけても通風は期待できなさそうです。 通風しない網戸って網戸の意味ないやん。窓を閉めとけばそれでええんちゃうかなぁ。 でも通気性はあるので閉めきってしまうよりかは空気は通るしやっぱり意味はあるのかな。 次回から、実際に色んな所に取り付けてみます。
2012/06/07 23:32 追記
くればぁさんからコメントがありました。
網戸用のメッシュは、これとはまた別の商品だそうです。
失礼致しました。
|
【転載シリーズ2 � 】
[ リスト | 詳細 ]
転載元: 
コメント（1）
|
Ｄ２５０１２６ シバちゃん（仮名）
①子犬
②女の子
③推定3ヶ月、体重4キロ
④雑種の子です。柴犬より大きくなると思います。
⑤仔犬らしく元気です。最初は用心しますが、慣れれば甘えん坊です。
⑥まだ子供の毛でフワフワでとても可愛いです。
   「譲渡条件」「譲渡の流れ」「アンケート」をお読み頂きまして、
ご理解頂きましたら、「アンケート」の返送をお願い致します
 譲渡条件は、
譲渡までの流れは、
|
|
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20040523x2.html
Sunday, May 23, 2004 Japan's deadly game of nuclear rouletteBy LEUREN MORET
Special to The Japan Times
Later it was revealed from GE documents that they had in fact informed TEPCO -- but that company did not notify government regulators of the hazards. Yoichi Kikuchi, a Japanese nuclear engineer who also became a whistle-blower, has told me personally of many safety problems at Japan's nuclear power plants, such as cracks in pipes in the cooling system from vibrations in the reactor. He said the electric companies are "gambling in a dangerous game to increase profits and decrease government oversight." Sugaoka agreed, saying, "The scariest thing, on top of all the other problems, is that all nuclear power plants are aging, causing a deterioration of piping and joints which are always exposed to strong radiation and heat." Like most whistle-blowers, Sugaoka and Kikuchi are citizen heroes, but are now unemployed.
The Radiation and Public Health Project, a group of independent U.S. scientists, has collected 4,000 baby teeth from children living around nuclear power plants. These teeth were then tested to determine their level of Strontium-90, a radioactive fission product that escapes in nuclear power plant emissions. Unborn children may be exposed to Strontium-90 through drinking water and the diet of the mother. Anyone living near nuclear power plants is internally exposed to chronically low levels of radiation contaminating food and drinking water. Increased rates of cancer, infant mortality and low birth weights leading to cognitive impairment have been linked to radiation exposure for decades. However, a recent independent report on low-level radiation by the European Committee on Radiation Risk, released for the European Parliament in January 2003, established that the ongoing U.S. Atomic and Hydrogen Bomb Studies conducted in Japan by the U.S. government since 1945 on Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors underestimated the risk of radiation exposure as much as 1,000 times. Additionally, on March 26 this year -- the eve of the 25th anniversary of the worst nuclear disaster in U.S. history, at the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania -- the Radiation and Public Health Project released new data on the effects of that event. This showed rises in infant deaths up to 53 percent, and in thyroid cancer of more than 70 percent in downwind counties -- data which, like all that concerning both the short- and long-term health effects, has never been forthcoming from the U.S. government. It is not a question of whether or not a nuclear disaster will occur in Japan; it is a question of when it will occur.
Like the former Soviet Union after Chernobyl, Japan will become a country suffering from radiation sickness destroying future generations, and widespread contamination of agricultural areas will ensure a public-health disaster. Its economy may never recover. Considering the extreme danger of major earthquakes, the many serious safety and waste-disposal issues, it is timely and urgent -- with about half its reactors currently shut down -- for Japan to convert nuclear power plants to fossil fuels such as natural gas. This process is less expensive than building new power plants and, with political and other hurdles overcome, natural gas from the huge Siberian reserves could be piped in at relatively low cost. Several U.S. nuclear plants have been converted to natural gas after citizen pressure forced energy companies to make changeovers. Commenting on this way out of the nuclear trap, Ernest Sternglass, a renowned U.S. scientist who helped to stop atmospheric testing in America, notes that, 'Most recently the Fort St. Vrain reactor in Colorado was converted to fossil fuel, actually natural gas, after repeated problems with the reactor. An earlier reactor was the Zimmer Power Plant in Cincinnati, which was originally designed as a nuclear plant but it was converted to natural gas before it began operating. This conversion can be done on any plant at a small fraction [20-30 percent] of the cost of building a new plant. Existing turbines, transmission facilities and land can be used."
|
|
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20040523x2.html
Sunday, May 23, 2004 Japan's deadly game of nuclear rouletteBy LEUREN MORET
Special to The Japan Times
When the geologic evidence was presented confirming the extreme danger at Hamaoka, the attending media were obviously shocked. The aerial map, filed by Chubu Electric Company along with its government application to build and operate the plant, showed major faults going through Hamaoka, and revealed that the company recognized the danger of an earthquake. They had carefully placed each reactor between major fault lines. "The structures of the nuclear plant are directly rooted in the rock bed and can tolerate a quake of magnitude 8.5 on the Richter scale," the utility claimed on its Web site. From my research and the investigation I conducted of the rocks in the area, I found that that the sedimentary beds underlying the plant were badly faulted. Some tiny faults I located were less than 1 cm apart. When I held up samples of the rocks the plant was sitting on, they crumbled like sugar in my fingers. "But the power company told us these were really solid rocks!" the reporters said. I asked, "Do you think these are really solid?' and they started laughing. On July 7 last year, the same day of my visit to Hamaoka, Ishibashi warned of the danger of an earthquake-induced nuclear disaster, not only to Japan but globally, at an International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics conference held in Sapporo. He said: "The seismic designs of nuclear facilities are based on standards that are too old from the viewpoint of modern seismology and are insufficient. The authorities must admit the possibility that an earthquake-nuclear disaster could happen and weigh the risks objectively." After the greatest nuclear power plant disaster in Japan's history at Tokai, Ibaraki Prefecture, in September 1999, large, expensive Emergency Response Centers were built near nuclear power plants to calm nearby residents. After visiting the center a few kilometers from Hamaoka, I realized that Japan has no real nuclear-disaster plan in the event that an earthquake damaged a reactor's water-cooling system and triggered a reactor meltdown. Additionally, but not even mentioned by ERC officials, there is an extreme danger of an earthquake causing a loss of water coolant in the pools where spent fuel rods are kept. As reported last year in the journal Science and Global Security, based on a 2001 study by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, if the heat-removing function of those pools is seriously compromised -- by, for example, the water in them draining out -- and the fuel rods heat up enough to combust, the radiation inside them will then be released into the atmosphere. This may create a nuclear disaster even greater than Chernobyl. If a nuclear disaster occurred, power-plant workers as well as emergency-response personnel in the Hamaoka ERC would immediately be exposed to lethal radiation. During my visit, ERC engineers showed us a tiny shower at the center, which they said would be used for "decontamination' of personnel. However, it would be useless for internally exposed emergency-response workers who inhaled radiation. When I asked ERC officials how they planned to evacuate millions of people from Shizuoka Prefecture and beyond after a Kobe-magnitude earthquake (Kobe is on the same subduction zone as Hamaoka) destroyed communication lines, roads, railroads, drinking-water supplies and sewage lines, they had no answer. Last year, James Lee Witt, former director of the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, was hired by New York citizens to assess the U.S. government's emergency-response plan for a nuclear power plant disaster. Citizens were shocked to learn that there was no government plan adequate to respond to a disaster at the Indian Point nuclear reactor, just 80 km from New York City. The Japanese government is no better prepared, because there is no adequate response possible to contain or deal with such a disaster. Prevention is really the only effective measure to consider. In 1998, Kei Sugaoka, 51, a Japanese-American senior field engineer who worked for General Electric in the United States from 1980 until being dismissed in 1998 for whistle-blowing there, alerted Japanese nuclear regulators to a 1989 reactor inspection problem he claimed had been withheld by GE from their customer, Tokyo Electric Power Company. This led to nuclear-plant shutdowns and reforms of Japan's power industry.
|
【乞う！情報拡散】福島原発事故がこれほど
深刻な状態■であることを国民は知らない！
”人生最後の事態”▼［日本滅亡］の危機に 直面▼
世にも恐ろしい日が目の前に近づいてはいないかと、胸騒ぎがす る
やる気も能力もない！東電！
政府も駄目！ 世界が終わる！
急ぎます！
ずうっと ハラハラしています！ こんな恐ろしいことはない。
燃料棒が
余震による建屋そのものの崩壊で
空気に直接触れれば！？その場で、人間は即死！
広島の5000発分の 放射能が飛び散る！
福島も
関東も
何処へ逃げられると言うのか？
日本列島だけではない。
北半球が、駄目だてふ。
いわき日和 さまより以下抜粋転記↓写真拝借
2012年07月20日同行取材を拒否された きょう２０日、いわき市議会議員が福島第一、第二原発を視察する。
どの程度近づけるかわからないが、４号機も見るという。
前もって同行取材を申し入れたが、東電から断られた。
「自治体や議会の視察で記者が同行した例はない」
というのが理由だった。
市議団はカメラの持ち込みも禁止され、
東電が撮った写真をあとで提供するという。何か変だ。
このところの４号機の動きをめぐって、 見られたくない事情、
明らかにされてはまずいこと、ものがあるのだろう。
東電の隠蔽体質はまったく変わっていない。
しかも、事故の原因者だというのに、
相変わらず上から目線で仕切ろうとする。
浪江の馬場町長の怒りはもっともだと思う。
先日もたらされた、４号機についての情報を持っている本人と会った。 話が生々しく、虚言とは思えない。
詳しくは書けないが、プールに入っている燃料棒の数は
発表されている数よりかなり多く、
東電が「支障はない」としているプールの傾きも、
７月１日の震度３の地震で、
２０度から２５度に大きくなっているという。
とりあえず大きな亀裂はふさいだので
水漏れによる水位の低下は、ある程度回避されたが、
一番心配なのは余震で、決して安心できる状態ではない。
しかし、
プール付近の線量がとてつもなく高く、
作業はかなり困難だという。
「種まきジャーナル」で小出裕章さんが話していたが、 使用済み核燃料は空気中に出した途端、
近づいた人間が
即死するほどの放射線を出す。
プールがある建屋そのものの補強も
本格的なものではないので、心配だ。
もう表面だけ取り繕うパフォーマンスはやめて、
世界の英知や技術を結集して、
燃料棒の取り出しを早急に行うべきだと思う。
今中さんと児玉さんの講演。 いわきで暮らしていく場合注意すべきなのは食べ物、という共通認識だった。
児玉さん曰く、 南相馬のホール・ボディ・カウンター検査のデータによると、
ほとんどの人のセシウムの値が下がっているのに、
下がらない人がいる。
それは家庭菜園や山のものを平気で食べている人で、
排出しても次々とセシウムを体に供給しているから減らない。
「きちんと線量を測ってある、信頼できる食べ物を食べる必要がある。
セシウムの数値が高かったら、数日後にホール・ボディ・カウンター検査を受けて
、数値の変遷を確認し、原因を探ること」と話した。
今中さんは、家庭菜園で作った食べ物をもらったとき、半分を測る。 そして２０Bq／ｋｇ以下だったら、残り半分を食べる。
煮たりすると、さらに数値は下がるという。
今中さんの場合、手軽に測って数値を確認することができるが、
一般人はそうはいかない。
市民測定室などの情報を気にしながら、極力、
放射性物質を取り込まない工夫をすることが肝心だ。
ここ数日頭をよぎるのは、 「なんでこんな国になってしまったのか」
ということ。
自分たちのメンツや混乱を回避するために、
事実をひた隠しに隠す。
野田政権は何を置いても、
４号機の問題解決に邁進しなければならない。
もし地震で建屋が崩れ、
大量の燃料棒が空気中に露出してしまったらどうなるのか、
考えればだれでもわかるはずなのだが…。
|
