![[11]](https://s.yimg.jp/i/jp/blog/p3/images/paging_for2.gif){kind=small}
|
See also the vocabulary lists.
Liber 1
7. 7. 英訳 ： １巻7.7 アウグスティヌス『霊魂とその源について』
タイトル
De praescientia dei se nititur liberare, sed frustra. ---------------- He is working his way to escape the most difficult place (the problem of God's prescience), but in a wrong manner. Item alio loco, cum eamdem, qua se ipse implicuerat, velut explicandam proponeret quaestionem, tamquam ex persona adversariorum ait: ---------------------- Moreover, at another place in his letter, showing the same problem in which he had engaged himself as to be unfolded now, says under the persona of his opponents : (*1)the problem about the original sin.............why did the soul get the original sin? "Cur, inquiunt, Deus animam tam iniusta animadversione mulctavit, ut in corpus eam peccati relegare voluerit, cum consortio carnis peccatrix esse incipit, quae peccatrix esse non potuit"?
--------------------- "Why (as the opponents ask) did God treat the soul with such an unjust intention, as to intend to send it away into the body of sin? For, by coming into a union with the body the soul ----who could not have been a sinner by that time---- starts to be a sinner." In huius quaestionis tamquam scopuloso gurgite, debuit utique cavere naufragium, nec eo se committere, unde se non erueret transeundo, sed forte redeundo, id est, poenitendo.
--------------------- In this question, which is like an ocean full of dangerous rocks, he should have been especially cautious against shipwreck, and even should not have sent himself there, from where he could not going to escape by just crossing, but perhaps he can by returning, that is to say, by regretting and reviewing his course (of thought). Nam de praescientia Dei se nititur liberare, sed frustra.
--------------------- For, he is working his way to escape the most difficult area, that is, the problem of God's foreknowledge, but in a wrong manner. Praescientia quippe Dei eos quos sanaturus est, peccatores praenoscit, non facit.
------------------- He has to know the fact, that by foreknowledge God "foreknows" those sinners whom he is going to heal, not "makes". Nam si eas animas liberat a peccato, quas innocentes et mundas implicuit ipse peccato, vulnus sanat quod intulit nobis, non quod invenit in nobis.
-------------------------- Because, if God frees those souls from sin whom he enveloped in sin, then he heals the wound which he "gave" us, not which he "found" and "discoverd" in us. (Isn't that absurd?) Avertat autem Deus, et omnino absit, ut dicamus, quando lavacro regenerationis Deus mundat animas parvulorum, tunc eum mala sua corrigere, quae illis ipse fecit, cum eas nullum habentes peccatum peccatrici carni, cuius originali peccato contaminarentur, admiscuit.
------------------- But God doesn't want us to say that "when God cleanses the souls of infants with the bath of regeneration, at that moment God corrects his own misdeeds which he had done to those souls, that is to say, when he mixed those originally sinless souls into the sinful body, from the intention that by the original sin of the body those souls would be contaminated", and we are far from saying that. Quas tamen iste accusans dicit inquinari meruisse per carnem, nec potest dicere unde tantum mali meruerint ante carnem.
------------------ However, he (Vincentius Victor) accusingly says that those souls by some reason deserved to be polluted by the body. But he can't give the reason, that is, why the souls, before the entrance into the body, deserved to get such a great misfortune, or punishment (=to be made to enter into the body, to be corrupted). |
アウグスティヌス
[ リスト | 詳細 ]
コメント（0）
|
Liber 1
8. 8. ....................Neque enim potuit originali peccato esse peccatrix, aut quoquo modo in originali peccato esse, nisi per carnem, si de parente non trahitur. Videmus ergo eam per gratiam liberari a peccato: sed non videmus unde meruerit haerere peccato. Quid est ergo quod dicit: "si peccatrix esse meruit, non tamen in peccato remansit"? Si enim ab illo quaeram, cur non in peccato remanserit, rectissime respondebit quod eam Christi gratia liberavit. Sicut ergo dicit unde anima parvuli fuerit liberata peccatrix, sic etiam dicat unde meruerit esse peccatrix.
VOCABULARY part 2
+quoquo modo : in whatever way
+si de parente non trahitur : the subject of this clause is "anima", not "originale peccatum", according to Liber 1 6.6 "si anima non de parentibus trahitur, sed a Deo nova insufflatur" +haereo : be fixed to, remain close to, be attached to (+dat.).........sometimes the idea of closeness or connection predominating........sometimes the idea of duration of connection predominating (continue being fixed to)..............sometimes the idea of hindrance caused by the connection predominating (be fixed to something and suspended or retarded by it, be attached to something and perplexed or troubled by it)
+quaerere : seek to learn from someone, ask, inquire (+ab)...........quaero ab medico quemadmodum me habeam (I ask the doctor how I should do)
+recte : rightly, correctly, accurately, properly +gratia : a ruler's grace, favor, condescension / favor or regard or love which one finds with others / favor which one shows to another, kind act which one does to another +unde : from what place ; from which place / from what cause or sauce or reason, by what means ; from which cause or sauce or reason, by which means
|
|
Liber 1
8. 8. Adhuc se involvit.
Hanc ergo quaestionem frustra se putans de praescientia Dei posse dissolvere, adhuc sese involvit, et dicit: "Anima si peccatrix esse meruit, quae peccatrix esse non potuit, tamen neque in peccato remansit, quia in Christo praefigurata in peccato esse non debuit, sicut esse non potuit". Quid est quod dicit, "peccatrix esse non potuit", vel "in peccato esse non potuit", nisi, credo, si non veniret in carnem?.......
VOCABULARY part 1
+ergo : used in introducing a conclusion.......consequently, therefore, accordingly / used in resuming an interrupted narrative, after parenthetical passages, or after deviation........then +frustra : in error / in vain, without effect / without reason, groundlessly +de : from..... (in space or time or in any other abstract sense) / according to (some rule or standard) / on account of, because of (some physical cause or mental reason) / concerning, about (a subject matter of thought) +dissolvere : unloose, loosen asunder, separate, disunite, dissolve a united thing, destroy / refute, answer and reply in argument / release a person, disengage a person......obsecuro, dissolve me (I pray you, release me) +solvere : loose or set free a thing or person bound, release ; construction......absolutely, +ab, +de@@@ (in corporeal sense, and in abstract senses) ---------- loosen a united thing or things = disunite, divide, dissolve, take apart, disperse, destroy, break asunder (in corporeal sense, and in abstract senses) --------- break up and construe a sentence for an analization and a better understanding, (of logical argument) refute (= analyze the opinion of others in order to overcome or overthrow it) / loose a thing that bounds, remove a thing that bounds ------ remove a thing that checks one's free movement ------- (of difficulties, riddles, questions, ambiguities) solve, explain, remove +dis- : correspondant with English "asunder", "in pieces", "apart", "in two", "in different directions" / giving an intensive force to a verb, "exceedingly" +adhuc : so far, hitherto / still / beside, moreover, in addition +involvere (perf. involvi) : roll.....(to anywhere).........<adhuc sese involvit> may mean "he still goes on"@@@ / wrap up, envelop, cover, ..................there might perhaps be a meaning "hide, wrap up in obscurity", in L&S the p.p. "involutus" means "involved = intricate, obscure"............<adhuc sese involvit> may mean "still he is hiding himself" / engage or involve A (acc.) in B (dat.)..............the literal meaning would be "roll in", then the phrase sese involvit might perhaps mean "he rolls himself in (the discussion)". +praefigurare : prefigure
+figurare : to shape, to form (physically, or mentally) / to imagine, to picture in mind +prae- : before, early.......praedico "say beforehand", praebibo "drink beforehand", praeceps "with the head before =headlong", praecanus "gray-headed in early age" (canus =gray hair) / enhancing the main idea, adding a comparison with others.....praealtus "exceedingly high (compared with others), praevalidus "very strong (compared with others) +debeo : to be bound under obligation to do (+inf.), to be destined to do (+inf.), should, must +sicut : (in comparison or simile) just like A, just as A / as if..... "came to Senate as if to a fight" / (with an accessary idea of cause) inasmuch as, since.........this is a chance of doing it, before he comes to this city, "since" he comes here tommorow, today he has not come............................because of this it is nice, "because" her twin sister came here to Ephesus / (in expressions like "sicut est", "sicut erat", etc., in confirmation of the preceding proposition) as indeed....., as in fact....., ...........I wish there were those people among us, who argue about the method of living, great men, "as indeed they are".........those things, however ridiculous they might have been, "as indeed they were", didn't make me laugh. +nisi, credo, si no veniret in carnem : except, I think, on the condition that the soul didn't come into the body |
|
単語の意味は
Liber 1
8. 8. タイトル Adhuc se involvit. 彼はさらにつづけて言う その１
Hanc ergo quaestionem frustra se putans de praescientia Dei posse dissolvere, adhuc sese involvit, et dicit:
さて、この神の予知能力についての問題を自分は解けるものと思いこんで*1、彼（ヴィンチェンティウス・ヴィクトル）はさらにつづけてこう言う・・・ (*1)または、「さて、この問題を神の予知能力と切り離して考えられるものと思いこんで」。どっちが正しい読みなのかは、先まで読んでいかないとぼくは決めれない。 "Anima si peccatrix esse meruit, quae peccatrix esse non potuit, tamen neque in peccato remansit, quia in Christo praefigurata in peccato esse non debuit, sicut esse non potuit".
「もし霊魂が罪ある存在となるに値するものを持っていたとしても・・・・・同時にまた、霊魂は罪ある存在であることもできなかったはず・・・・、罪の中にとどまることもなかった。なぜなら、キリストの力によってすぐれた形成のされかたをしている以上、罪の中にいるべきではないからである。事実、罪の中にいつづけることはできなかった。」 Quid est quod dicit, "peccatrix esse non potuit", vel "in peccato esse non potuit", nisi, credo, si non veniret in carnem?
彼の言う「霊魂は罪ある存在であることはできなかった」とか「罪の中にいることはできなかった」というのはどういう意味でしょう？思うに、＜肉体の中に入らないかぎりでは＞という意味ではないでしょうか。 Neque enim potuit originali peccato esse peccatrix, aut quoquo modo in originali peccato esse, nisi per carnem, si de parente non trahitur.
つまり、霊魂は親からもらうものではなく、神によって吹きこまれるものである*1以上、肉体なしでは原罪をかかえる罪ある存在であることも、原罪の中にいることもできなかったはずだからです。 (*1)Liber 1 6.6 "si anima non de parentibus trahitur, sed a Deo nova insufflatur"（もし霊魂が両親からもらうものではなく、神から新たに吹きこまれるものであるなら） Videmus ergo eam per gratiam liberari a peccato: sed non videmus unde meruerit haerere peccato.
だからわたしたちは霊魂が神のおめぐみによって罪から解放されることはわかりますが、霊魂がなぜ罪と一体にされるに値するのかは理解できません。 Quid est ergo quod dicit: "si peccatrix esse meruit, non tamen in peccato remansit"?
さて彼の言う「もし霊魂が罪ある存在となるに値した（そして罪あるものになった）としても、また、罪の中にとどまることもなかった」とはどういう意味でしょう？ Si enim ab illo quaeram, cur non in peccato remanserit, rectissime respondebit quod eam Christi gratia liberavit.
もし彼に、なぜ霊魂は罪の中にとどまらなかったのかと問えば、キリストのおめぐみが霊魂を解放したのだと正しく答えるでしょう。 Sicut ergo dicit unde anima parvuli fuerit liberata peccatrix, sic etiam dicat unde meruerit esse peccatrix.
だったら、罪ある存在としての赤ちゃんの霊魂が、どうして罪から解放されるか説明できるように、彼はなぜ霊魂が罪ある存在になるに値したのかをも説明すべきなのです。 |
|
Liber 1
8. 8. タイトル Adhuc se involvit. 彼はさらにつづけて言う その１
Hanc ergo quaestionem frustra se putans de praescientia Dei posse dissolvere, adhuc sese involvit, et dicit:
さて、この神の予知能力についての問題を自分は解けるものと思いこんで*1、彼（ヴィンチェンティウス・ヴィクトル）はさらにつづけてこう言う・・・ (*1)または、「さて、この問題を神の予知能力と切り離して考えられるものと思いこんで」。どっちが正しい読みなのかは、先まで読んでいかないとぼくは決めれない。 "Anima si peccatrix esse meruit, quae peccatrix esse non potuit, tamen neque in peccato remansit, quia in Christo praefigurata in peccato esse non debuit, sicut esse non potuit".
「もし霊魂が罪ある存在となるに値するものを持っていたとしても・・・・・同時にまた、霊魂は罪ある存在であることもできなかったはず・・・・、罪の中にとどまることもなかった。なぜなら、キリストの力によってすぐれた形成のされかたをしている以上、罪の中にいるべきではないからである。事実、罪の中にいつづけることはできなかった。」 Quid est quod dicit, "peccatrix esse non potuit", vel "in peccato esse non potuit", nisi, credo, si non veniret in carnem?
彼の言う「霊魂は罪ある存在であることはできなかった」とか「罪の中にいることはできなかった」というのはどういう意味でしょう？思うに、＜肉体の中に入らないかぎりでは＞という意味ではないでしょうか。 VOCABULARY
+ergo : used in introducing a conclusion.......consequently, therefore, accordingly / used in resuming an interrupted narrative, after parenthetical passages, or after deviation........then +frustra : in error / in vain, without effect / without reason, groundlessly +de : from..... (in space or time or in any other abstract sense) / according to (some rule or standard) / on account of, because of (some physical cause or mental reason) / concerning, about (a subject matter of thought) +dissolvere : unloose, loosen asunder, separate, disunite, dissolve a united thing, destroy / refute, answer and reply in argument / release a person, disengage a person......obsecuro, dissolve me (I pray you, release me) +solvere : loose or set free a thing or person bound, release ; construction......absolutely, +ab, +de@@@ (in corporeal sense, and in abstract senses) ---------- loosen a united thing or things = disunite, divide, dissolve, take apart, disperse, destroy, break asunder (in corporeal sense, and in abstract senses) --------- break up and construe a sentence for an analization and a better understanding, (of logical argument) refute (= analyze the opinion of others in order to overcome or overthrow it) / loose a thing that bounds, remove a thing that bounds ------ remove a thing that checks one's free movement ------- (of difficulties, riddles, questions, ambiguities) solve, explain, remove +dis- : correspondant with English "asunder", "in pieces", "apart", "in two", "in different directions" / giving an intensive force to a verb, "exceedingly" +adhuc : so far, hitherto / still / beside, moreover, in addition +involvere (perf. involvi) : roll.....(to anywhere).........<adhuc sese involvit> may mean "he still goes on"@@@ / wrap up, envelop, cover, ..................there might perhaps be a meaning "hide, wrap up in obscurity", in L&S the p.p. "involutus" means "involved = intricate, obscure"............<adhuc sese involvit> may mean "still he is hiding himself" / engage or involve A (acc.) in B (dat.)..............the literal meaning would be "roll in", then the phrase sese involvit might perhaps mean "he rolls himself in (the discussion)". +praefigurare : prefigure
+figurare : to shape, to form (physically, or mentally) / to imagine, to picture in mind +prae- : before, early.......praedico "say beforehand", praebibo "drink beforehand", praeceps "with the head before =headlong", praecanus "gray-headed in early age" (canus =gray hair) / enhancing the main idea, adding a comparison with others.....praealtus "exceedingly high (compared with others), praevalidus "very strong (compared with others) +debeo : to be bound under obligation to do (+inf.), to be destined to do (+inf.), should, must +sicut : (in comparison or simile) just like A, just as A / as if..... "came to Senate as if to a fight" / (with an accessary idea of cause) inasmuch as, since.........this is a chance of doing it, before he comes to this city, "since" he comes here tommorow, today he has not come............................because of this it is nice, "because" her twin sister came here to Ephesus / (in expressions like "sicut est", "sicut erat", etc., in confirmation of the preceding proposition) as indeed....., as in fact....., ...........I wish there were those people among us, who argue about the method of living, great men, "as indeed they are".........those things, however ridiculous they might have been, "as indeed they were", didn't make me laugh. +nisi, credo, si no veniret in carnem : except, I think, on the condition that the soul didn't come into the body |
