´õ¡¦Íå¸ìʸ¸¥¤ÎÌõ¤·Êý¸¦µæ ¡Êµì¥Ç¡¦¥¢¥Ë¥Þ¤ÎÌõ¤ò¤¤¤Ä¤«¤ä¤ê¤¿¤¤¡Ë

ÃæÀ¤¤ÎÀ»²Î¤ÎÌõ¤Èñ¸ìÄ¢¡¢¤â¤·¥ê¥¯¥¨¥¹¥È¤Ê¤É¤¬¤¢¤ì¤Ð¤â¤¦¾¯¤·ÎϤòÆþ¤ì¤Æ¤ä¤ê¤Þ¤¹¡£

¥Õ¥£¥í¥Ý¥Î¥¹ÍåÌõ £³¡§£¶

[ ¥ê¥¹¥È | ¾ÜºÙ ]

µ­»ö¸¡º÷
¸¡º÷

Á´2¥Ú¡¼¥¸

[1] [2]

[ ¼¡¤Î¥Ú¡¼¥¸ ]

430 b 17-19 INEST AUTEM IN HIS ALIQUID INDIVISIBILE, SED FORTE NON SEPARABILE, QUOD FACIT UNUM TEMPUS ET LONGITUDINEM.


...........Hoc autem: secundum accidens et non qua illa divisibilia et cetera sic exponitur.
¼¡¤Ë¡¢¡Ö¼ÁÎÁŪ¤Ê¼ï*1¤ÏÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¤½¤·¤Æ¤¢¤ì¤é¡Ê¡á¥Î¥¨¥Þ¡Ë¤È¤·¤ÆÍý²ò¤µ¤ì¤ë¤Î¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¾ì¹ç¤Ï¡¢²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡¢±¾¡¹¡×¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¡£
(*1)¡áÃÎÀ­¤Îǧ¼±Âоݡ£
Quoniam enim qou intelligit noema, idest conceptum, intellexit, hoc utique erit dicens, ait, quia si quis contendat noema, idest conceptum, divisibile esse, esto secundum accidens posse dici divisibile, et non qua noema, et vox, per quam profert ista et intelligit divisibilia sunt, et qua indivisibiliaentia noemata partibilibus entibus vocibus congruunt.
¤¹¤Ê¤ï¤Á¡¢¥¢¥ê¥¹¥È¥Æ¥ì¥¹¤Ï²¿¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤Æ¥Î¥¨¥Þ¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦°ÕÌ£*1¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤¬Ç§¼±¤µ¤ì¤ë¤Î¤«¤òƧ¤Þ¤¨¤Æ¡¢¼¡¤Î¤è¤¦¤ËÀâÌÀ¤¹¤ë¡£
¤â¤·Ã¯¤«¤¬¥Î¥¨¥Þ¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦°ÕÌ£¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤Ï²Äʬ¤Ê¤â¤Î¤À¤È¼çÄ¥¤¹¤ë¤Ê¤é¡¢¤½¤Î¾ì¹ç¡¢ÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç¤Ï*2²Äʬ¤À¤È¸À¤¨¤ë¤È¤·¤è¤¦¡£¤·¤«¤·¥Î¥¨¥Þ¤È¤·¤Æ¤Ï¡¢¤½¤·¤Æ¥Î¥¨¥Þ¤òÅÁ㤷¤¿¤êʹ¤¤¤ÆÍý²ò¤·¤¿¤ê¤¹¤ë¤Î¤Ë»È¤ï¤ì¤ë¸ÀÍÕ*3¤È¤·¤Æ¤Ï¡¢²Äʬ¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¡£¡ÊÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê¸ºß¤È¤·¤Æ¤Î¥Î¥¨¥Þ¤Ï²Äʬ¤Ê¸ºß¤Ç¤¢¤ë¸ÀÍդȰìÂΤȤʤäƤ¤¤ë¤â¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£*4¡Ë
(*1)¥Î¥¨¥Þ¤Ï¿´¤ËÉ⤫¤ÖÂоݰìÈ̤ò»Ø¤·¡¢¤À¤«¤é»×¹Í¤Î¤³¤È¤Ç¤â¤¢¤ê¡¢³µÇ°¤Î¤³¤È¤Ç¤â¤¢¤ê¡¢¸ÀÍդΰÕÌ£¤Î¤³¤È¤Ç¤â¤¢¤ë¡£
(*2)ÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç¡á¤¢¤ë¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¡¢¤¢¤ë¾ì¹ç¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¡Ê¤³¤³¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¸ÀÍդȰìÂΤˤʤäƤ¤¤ë¤È¤¤¤¦¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¡Ë
(*3)ȯÀ¼¤µ¤ì¤¿¸ÀÍÕ
(*4)¥Î¥¨¥Þ¡á¸ÀÍդΰÕÌ£¡£
Propter partibilitatem enim vocum quibus congruunt, ipsa indivisibilia entia, secundum accidens dicuntur propter illa esse divisibilia.
¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¡¢¥Î¥¨¥Þ¡Ê¡á°ÕÌ£¡Ë¤È°ìÂΤȤʤäƤ¤¤ë¸ÀÍÕ¤¬²Äʬ¤Ê¤â¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤¿¤á¤Ë¡¢¥Î¥¨¥Þ¤È¤¤¤¦¤½¤ì¼«ÂÎÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê¸ºß¤¬¡¢ÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç¡¢²Äʬ¤À¤È¸À¤ï¤ì¤ë¤ï¤±¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£



<< keys >>

+Hoc autem : introducing the passage from Aristotle
+secundum accidens et non qua illa divisibilia : divisible in accidental condition and not as illa(=material species)
+Quoniam.......intellexit, : since Aristotle knew.....,
+hoc utique erit dicens, ait, quia ..... : this Aristotle is going to say : he says : that...........
+contento : maintain strongly, assert strongly
+profero : bring forth, bring in front, present / express by word or something / reveal, publish
+ista : probably referring to "noema", which is however neuter singular ("noema"'s plural is "noemata") while "ista" is neuter plural. But this "ista" might refer to "the intellectual objects as noema", and they are treated as neuter plural.
+non......divisibilia sunt : (intellectual objects) are not divisible
+congruo + dative : fit, be in harmony, agree
+propter illa : this has to be "propter illam (partibilitatem)"

430 b 17-19 INEST AUTEM IN HIS ALIQUID INDIVISIBILE, SED FORTE NON SEPARABILE, QUOD FACIT UNUM TEMPUS ET LONGITUDINEM.



...........Quod autem non secundum actum quantum indivisibile, sed specie, intelligit in indivisibili tempore et indivisibili animae.
¼¡¤Ë¡¢ÃÎÀ­¤Îǧ¼±Âоݤ¬¸½¼ÂÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ*1¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¡¢¼ï*2¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤ÆÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤È¤¤¤¦¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¡¢ÃÎÀ­¤¬ÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê»þ´Ö¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¡¢Î¤ÎÉÔ²Äʬ¤ÊÉôʬ¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤ÆÇ§¼±¤ò¤¹¤ë¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¡£
(*1)¸½¼ÂÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ¡á¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë¡¢¤½¤Î¤â¤Î¤È¤·¤Æ / ̵¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¡¢´ðËܾõÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ
(*2)ÏÀÍý³Ø¤äÀ¸Êª³Ø¤Ç¤¤¤¦¡ÖÎࡦ¼ï¡×¤Î¼ï¡£¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡Ö¸½¼ÂÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¡¢¼ï¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤ÆÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡×¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤Îʸ¤Î°ÕÌ£¤ÏÌ·½â¤Î¤è¤¦¤À¤±¤ì¤É¡Ê¥Õ¥£¥í¥Ý¥Î¥¹¤Ï¤Õ¤À¤ó¤Ï¼ï¡á¸½¼ÂÂ֤ȸ«¤Ê¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤«¤é¡Ë¡¢°Ê²¼¤ÇÌÀ¤é¤«¤Ë¤Ê¤ë¤è¤¦¤À¡£¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¡Ö¿Í´Ö¤Ï²¿²¯¤â¤Î¸ÄÂΡʸĿ͡ˤËʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤ë¡×¡Ö¿Í´Ö¤Ï¼ï¤È¤·¤Æ¤Ïʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¡×


Haec verba Themistius exponit hoc modo.
¤³¤Î¤³¤È¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤Ï¥Æ¥ß¥¹¥Æ¥£¥¦¥¹¤¬¤³¤ó¤Ê¤Õ¤¦¤ËÀâÌÀ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£
Indivisibilia enim specie pro non possibilia secundum speciem dividi, veluti hominem, et adhuc magis Socratem: hic quidem est in individua, non in species dividitur, hic autem non in individua, ipsum enim individuum est.
¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¡¢¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¼ï¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤ÆÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê¤â¤Î¤È¤Ï¡¢¼ï¤È¤·¤Æ¤Ïʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¤â¤Î¤Î¤³¤È¤Ç¡¢Î㤨¤Ð¿Í´Ö¤È¤«¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£¤â¤Ã¤È¤Õ¤µ¤ï¤·¤¤Îã¤È¤·¤Æ¤Ï¥½¥¯¥é¥Æ¥¹¤¬¤¢¤ë¡£¿Í´Ö¤Ï̵¿ô¤Î¸ÄÂΤؤÈʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¡¢¼ï¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¤Ïʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¡£¥½¥¯¥é¥Æ¥¹¤Ï¤½¤ì¼«ÂΤ¬¸ÄÂΤʤΤǡ¢¤µ¤é¤Ë¸ÄÂΤؤȤÏʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¡Ê¤½¤·¤Æ¼ï¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¤âÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡Ë¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤Î¤´¤È¤¯¡£
Sed si hoc, non adhuc erit dicens qualiter et generaliora intelligit, animal puta aut substantiam, sed irrationale in individuas species includere sermonem.
¤·¤«¤·¤½¤ì¤Ï¤½¤¦¤À¤È¤·¤Æ¤â¡¢¿Í´Ö¤ä¥½¥¯¥é¥Æ¥¹¤è¤ê¤µ¤é¤ËÉáÊ×Ū¤Ê¤â¤Î¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦Î㤨¤Ðưʪ¤È¤«¡¢¼ÂÂΤȤ«¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤ò¤É¤¦¤ä¤Ã¤ÆÃÎÀ­¤Ïǧ¼±¤¹¤ë¤Î¤«¡¢¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤Ï¤Þ¤À¤³¤ì¤«¤éÀâÌÀ¤µ¤ì¤Ê¤¤¤È¤¤¤±¤Ê¤¤¡£¸ÄÊÌŪ¤Ê¼ï¡ÊÎã¡§¡Öưʪ¡×¤ËÂФ·¤Æ¡Ö¿Í´Ö¡×¡¢¡Ö¿¢Êª¡×¤ËÂФ·¤Æ¡Ö¤ê¤ó¤´¡×¡Ë¤À¤±¤ËÏäò¸ÂÄꤹ¤ë¤Î¤Ï²òÀâ¤È¤·¤ÆÉÔ½½Ê¬¤À¤«¤é¡£
Specie igitur intelligendum indivisibilia entia, secundum quod species sunt.
¤µ¤Æ¡¢¾å¤Î¸ÀÍաʺǽé¤Îʸ¡Ë¤Ï¼ï¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤ÆÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê¸ºß¤Î¤³¤È¡¢¼ï¤È¤·¤ÆÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê¸ºß¤Î¤³¤È¤ò¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤ë¤Î¤À¤ÈÍý²ò¤µ¤ì¤ë¤Ù¤­¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£
Species enim qua species est, non utique dividetur.
ÀâÌÀ¤¹¤ë¤È¡¢¼ï¤Ï¤½¤ì¼«ÂΤȤ·¤Æ¤Ïʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤¨¤Ê¤¤¤â¤Î¤À¡£
Út enim continuum, simul cum divisum fuerit, non adhuc manet continuum, ita utique et species simul cum divisa fuerit, corrumpitur, út iam diximus.
¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¡¢Ï¢Â³ÂΡÊÎ㤨¤Ð£´¥»¥ó¥Á¥á¡¼¥È¥ë¡Ë¤Ïʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤¿½Ö´Ö¤â¤¦¸µ¤ÎϢ³ÂΡʣ´¥»¥ó¥Á¥á¡¼¥È¥ë¡Ë¤Ç¤Ê¤¯¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤·¤Þ¤¦¤è¤¦¤Ë¡¢¼ï¤âʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤¿½Ö´Ö¤ËÌǤó¤Ç¤·¤Þ¤¦¡Ê¡á¸µ¤Î¼ï¤½¤ì¼«ÂΤǤϤʤ¯¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤·¤Þ¤¦¡Ë¡¢¤È¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¤À¡£Á°¤Ë¤â¤½¤ì¤Ï¸À¤Ã¤¿¡£


Hoc autem: in indivisibili tempore pro: nunc; hoc autem: et in indivisibili animae, hoc est indivisibili intelligentia,
¤Þ¤¿¡¢¡ÖÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê»þ´Ö¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¡×¤È¤¤¤¦¤Î¤Ï¡Öº£¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¡×¤È¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¡£¡ÖÎ¤ÎÉÔ²Äʬ¤ÊÉôʬ¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¡×¤È¤Ï¡ÖÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê¤â¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ëÃÎÀ­¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¡×¤È¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¡£
non enim dimidiumSocratis in dimidio intelligentiae novit, dimidium autem in reliquo.
ÀâÌÀ¤¹¤ë¤È¡¢¥½¥¯¥é¥Æ¥¹¤ÎȾʬ¤òÃÎÀ­¤ÎȾʬ¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤ÆÇ§¼±¤·¡¢¥½¥¯¥é¥Æ¥¹¤Î¤â¤¦È¾Ê¬¤òÃÎÀ­¤Î¤â¤¦È¾Ê¬¤Çǧ¼±¤¹¤ë¡¢¤Î¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¤«¤é¤À¡£
Non enim coextenditur huic voci «homo» continuitas conceptus, quoniam neque significatum huius vocis «homo» condistenditur syllabis nominis.
¤Þ¤¿ÀâÌÀ¤¹¤ë¤È¡¢¡Ö¿Í´Ö¡×¤È¤¤¤¦È¯À¼¤µ¤ì¤¿¸ÀÍÕ¤¬¤¢¤ë»þ´Ö¤Ë¤ï¤¿¤Ã¤Æ¿­¤Ó¤Æ¤¤¤¯¤È¤­¡¢¡Ö¿Í´Ö¡×¤Î³µÇ°¤â»þ´ÖŪ¤Ë¿­¤Ó¤Æ¤¤¤¯¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¤·¡¢¡Ö¿Í´Ö¡×¤È¤¤¤¦¸ÀÍդΰÕÌ£¤¬¡¢¿Í´Ö¤È¤¤¤¦¸ì¤Î¥·¥é¥Ö¥ë¤Î¿ô¤À¤±Áý¤¨¤Æ¤¤¤¯¡¢¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¤â¤Ê¤¤¡£
Sed nomen quidem visibile, significatum autem ab ipso indivisibile.
¤¿¤À¡¢¡ÖȯÀ¼¤µ¤ì¤¿¸ÀÍաפÏʹ¤³¤¨¤ë¡¢¤Ä¤Þ¤ê´¶³Ð¤µ¤ì¤ë*1¤â¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ë°ìÊý¡¢¤½¤Î¸ÀÍդΡְÕÌ£¡×¤Ï¡¢¤½¤ÎȯÀ¼¤µ¤ì¤¿¸ÀÍÕ¤«¤éÀÚ¤êÎ¥¤»¤Ê¤¤¡£*2
(*1)visibile ¤Ï¡Ö¸«¤¨¤ë¡×¤È¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¡£½ñ¤«¤ì¤¿¸ÀÍÕ¤¬¡Ö¸«¤¨¤ë¡×¡¢¤È¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¤À¤í¤¦¡£Ïäò¤ï¤«¤ê¤ä¤¹¤¯¤¹¤ë¤¿¤á¤Ë¡Öʹ¤³¤¨¤ë¡×¤ÈÌõ¤·¤¿¡£¤Ç¤â¤³¤ì¤Ï divisibile¡Ö²Äʬ¤Ê¡×¤Î¸í¿¢¤«¤â¤·¤ì¤Ê¤¤¡£
(*1)¤³¤ÎÅâÆÍ¤Êȯ¸À¤Ï¾¯¤·¸å¤Ç¡Öqua indivisibilia entia noemata partibilibus entibus vocibus congruunt¡ÊÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê¸ºß¤È¤·¤Æ¤Î¥Î¥¨¥Þ¡Ê¡á°ÕÌ£¡Ë¤Ï²Äʬ¤Ê¸ºß¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡ãȯÀ¼¤µ¤ì¤¿À¼¡ä¤È°ìÂΤǤ¢¤ë¡×¤È¤¤¤¦¤Õ¤¦¤ËÀâÌÀ¤µ¤ì¤ë¡£







<< keys >>

+quantum : inasmuch as, as
+non secundum actum quantum indivisibile, sed specie : "inasmuch as (the object of intellect is) indivisible not in actuality, but in species".................
+pro : for, as (for a representation of..., as a representation of....)
+non possibilia secundum speciem dividi : such things as are not able to be divided in terms of species
+hic quidem est in individua, non in species dividitur, hic autem non in individua, ipsum enim individuum est. : probably.........."while human being can be divided into individuals but isn't divided into species, Socrates can't be divided into individuals, because he is an individual."

+generalis : general, common among many species
+irrationale : irrationale est +inf. .....(it's unreasonable to....)
+includo : shut...in...., limit....in....

+Hoc autem: in indivisibili tempore pro: nunc : this phrase "in indivisible time", as "now"
+dimidium : half
+reliquo : another (another half)

+coextenditur huic voci homo : extend together with this word "homo"
+conceptus : concept (of the word "homo")
+condistendo : =conextendo
+syllaba : syllable

+visibile : visible, and at the same time divisible, because visible things are with matter and divisible

ÆÉ²ò¤Î¤·¤«¤¿¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤ÏÁ°¤ÎÅê¹Æ¤ò¸«¤Æ¤¯¤À¤µ¤¤¡£http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/dakuserukun/35259789.html


430 b 17-19 INEST AUTEM IN HIS ALIQUID INDIVISIBILE, SED FORTE NON SEPARABILE, QUOD FACIT UNUM TEMPUS ET LONGITUDINEM.



.................Ab hac autem utique expositione non dissonat scriptura quae dicit : in divisibili tempore et divisibili animae.
¤·¤«¤·¡¢¥Ç¡¦¥¢¥Ë¥ÞËÜʸ¤Î¡Ö²Äʬ¤Ê»þ´Ö¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¡¢Î¤Î²Äʬ*1¤ÊÉôʬ¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¡ÊÃÎÀ­¤Ï¼ï*2¤òǧ¼±¤ò¤¹¤ë¡Ë¡×¤È¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤È¤³¤í¤Ï¡¢°Ê¾å¤ÎÀâÌÀ¤ÈÉÔ°ìÃפʤ櫓¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¡£
(*1)²Äʬ¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦Ê¬³ä²Äǽ¡¢¤È¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¡£
(*2)¼ï¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦ÃÎŪ¤Êǧ¼±ÂоݤΤ³¤È¡£¡Ö¼ï¡×¤È¤¤¤¦¤Î¤Ï¥¢¥ê¥¹¥È¥Æ¥ì¥¹¤ÎÏÀÍý³Ø¤Ç¸À¤¦¡ÖÎà¡×¤È¤«¡Ö¼ï¡×¤È¤«¡Ö¼ïº¹¡×¤Î¼ï¤Î¤³¤È¡£¤Ç¡¢¤³¤Î¼ï¤Ïʪ¤ÎËܼÁ¡¦¼ÂÂΤΤ³¤È¡£ÃÎÀ­¤Ïʪ¤ÎËܼÁ¤ò¤È¤é¤¨¤ë¡£
Qualiter dixit tempus in quo intelligit divisibile, et qualiter partem animae subiunxit quia: secundum accidens et non sicut illa (hoc est species materiales quas intellegit).
¤É¤¦¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¤Ç¥¢¥ê¥¹¥È¥Æ¥ì¥¹¤Ïǧ¼±¤Î»þ´Ö¤¬²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ê¡¢Ç§¼±¤¹¤ëÎ¤ÎÉôʬ¤¬²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤È¸À¤Ã¤¿¤Î¤«¤Ï¡¢¤Ä¤Å¤¯¸Ä½ê¤ÇÀâÌÀ¤µ¤ì¤ë¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡ÖÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç*1¡¢¤½¤·¤Æ¤½¤ì¤é*2¤È¤·¤Æ¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¤È¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¤Ç¡×¡£
(*1)ÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç¡á´ðËÜŪ¤Ç¤Ê¤¤°ÕÌ£¤Ç¡á´ðËÜŪ¤Ç¤Ê¤¤¾õÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ¡á¥¢¥¯¥·¥Ç¥ó¥È¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤Æ¡á¤¢¤ë¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦Îã¡§¡Ö¡û¡ûÁª¼ê¤ÏÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ë¤ÏÈþ¤·¤¤¡×¡Ö¡û¡ûÁª¼ê¤Ï¥Ð¥ì¡¼¤ò¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤È¤­¤À¤±¤ÏÈþ¤·¤¤¡×¡Ö¡û¡ûÁª¼ê¤Ï¤­¤Î¤¦¤ÏÈþ¤·¤«¤Ã¤¿¡Ê¤Ç¤â¤¤¤Ä¤â¤ÏÈþ¤·¤¯¤Ê¤¤¡Ë¡×
(*2)¤â¤¦¾¯¤·¸å¤Ç¤³¤Î¡Ö¤½¤ì¤é¡×¤Ï¥Î¥¨¥Þ¤Î¤³¤È¤À¤È¤ï¤«¤ë¡£
Hae quidem enim loco divisibiles erant et actu dividi possibiles ut magnitudines, hae aut ratione ut plantae, hoc quidem generativum et augmentativum et nutritivum, hae autem secundum ambo, út forma, puta quae hominis; loco enim distant partes vel aliam habent substantiae rationem.
¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¡Ê¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤òȼ¤Ã¤¿¡¢¼ÁÎÁ¤ò¼è¤êʧ¤Ã¤Æ¤Ê¤¤¾õÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ¤Ï¡Ë¼ÁÎÁŪ¤Ê¼ï¤Ï¡¢
£±¡¥¶õ´ÖŪ¤ÊÂ礭¤µ¤Î¤¢¤ë¤â¤Î¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ë¡¢¶õ´ÖŪ¤Ëʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¡¢¸½¼ÂÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ*1²Äʬ¤À¤È¸À¤¨¤ë¤³¤È¤â¤¢¤ë¤·¡¢
£²¡¥¿¢Êª¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ë¡¢ÄêµÁ¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ²Äʬ¤À¤È¸À¤¨¤ë¤³¤È¤â¤¢¤ë¤·¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤Ä¤Þ¤ê»Ò¹¤ò¤Ä¤¯¤ëÉôʬ¤È¡¢À®Ä¹¤ò¤Ä¤«¤µ¤É¤ëÉôʬ¤È¡¢±ÉÍÜÀݼè¤ò¤¢¤Ä¤«¤¦Éôʬ¤Ë¿¢Êª¤ÎÄêµÁ¤Ïʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤ë¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¢
£³¡¥·Á¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ë¡ÊÎ㤨¤Ð¿Í´Ö¤Î·Á¡Ë¡¢¶õ´ÖŪ¤Ë¤âÄêµÁ¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¤âʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤ë¤³¤È¤â¤¢¤ë¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦·Á¤Î£±¤Ä£±¤Ä¤ÎÉôʬ¤Ï¶õ´ÖŪ¤ËÎ¥¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤·¡¢ÊÌ¡¹¤ÎÄêµÁ*2¤ò»ý¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡£
¡Ê°Ê¾å¡¢ÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç¼ÁÎÁŪ¤Ê¼ï¤¬²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤³¤È¤ÎÀâÌÀ¡£¡Ë
(*1)¡á¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë¡á´ðËÜŪ¤Ê¾õÂ֤Ȥ·¤Æ¡á´ðËÜŪ¤Ë¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦Îã¡§¡Ö¡û¡ûÁª¼ê¤Ï¼«ÂÎŪ¤ËÈþ¤·¤¤¡×¡Ö¡û¡ûÁª¼ê¤Ï¤¤¤Ä¤â¡¢¤Õ¤À¤ó¤«¤éÈþ¤·¤¤¡×¡Ö¡û¡ûÁª¼ê¤Ï´ðËÜŪ¤Ë¤ÏÈþ¤·¤¤¤¬¡¢¤¢¤ë¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¤ÏÈþ¤·¤¯¤Ê¤¤¡×
(*2)ÄêµÁ¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¼ÂÂΤˤĤ¤¤Æ¤ÎÄêµÁ
Secundum nullum igitur horum divisibilis est phantasia nisi solum secundum accidens, ut dictum est;
¤À¤«¤é¸À¤Ã¤¿¤È¤ª¤ê¡¢¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò¤¢¤Ä¤«¤¦ÎÉôʬ*1¤Ï¶õ´ÖŪ¤Ë¤âÄêµÁ¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¤â¡¢ÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ë¤·¤«¡¢²Äʬ¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¤Î¤À¡£


sed neque tempus nisi potentia solum et secundum intellectum; continuum enim est et non intercisum, nostra autem meditatio est quae in annos et menses et dies et horas ipsum dividit.
¤·¤«¤·¤Þ¤¿»þ´Ö¤â¡¢²ÄǽŪ¤Ë¤·¤«*2¡¢Ç§¼±¤Î¾å¤Ç¤·¤«²Äʬ¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¡£¤Ä¤Þ¤êϢ³ÂÎ*3¤Ïʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤Ê¤¤¤È¤â¸À¤¨¤ë¤Î¤À¡£¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¤¿¤À¤ï¤¿¤·¤¿¤Á¤¬Æ¬¤ÎÃæ¤Ç¤½¤ì¤òǯ¤ä·î¤äÆü¤ä»þ¤äʬ¤äÉäËʬ³ä¤¹¤ë¤À¤±¤À¤È¤â¡£
(*1)¤³¤ÎÉôʬ¤Ï¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤òÉ⤫¤Ù¤ë¤³¤È¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤ÆÃÎÀ­¤ò½õ¤±¤ë¡£Î㤨¤Ð¡¢ÃÎÀ­¤¬·ª¸¶¤á¤°¤ßÁª¼ê¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¹Í¤¨¤ë¤È¤­¡¢¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò¤¢¤Ä¤«¤¦ÎÉôʬ¤¬·ª¸¶Áª¼ê¤Î»ë³ÐŪ¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤òÉ⤫¤Ù¤Æ¡¢¤½¤Î»×¹Í¤ò½õ¤±¤ë¡£
(*2)¡áÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ë¤·¤«
(*3)»þ´Ö¤Î¤³¤È¡£Ï¢Â³¤·¤Æ¤Ç¤­¤Æ¤ë¤â¤Î¤Î¤³¤È¡£
Non enim utique stabit aliquando sol, ut in partes dividatur tempus.
¤Ê¤¼¤Ê¤éÂÀÍۤα¿¹Ô¤Ï·è¤·¤Æ»ß¤Þ¤é¤Ê¤¤¤À¤í¤¦¤«¤é¡¢»þ´Ö¤ÏÉôʬ¤Ëʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤â¡£*1
(*1)¤³¤Îʸ¤Î°ÕÌ£¤Ï¤Þ¤Ã¤¿¤¯¤ï¤«¤ê¤Ë¤¯¤¤¤±¤É¡¢°Ê²¼¤òÆÉ¤ó¤Ç¤¤¤¯¤È¤À¤¤¤¿¤¤¤ï¤«¤ë¡£
Sed sicut omnis magnitudo divisibilis esse dicitur qua magnitudo est, non omnes autem actu divisae esse possunt, sed solum quae in generatione et corruptione (caelestia enim, puta sol nunquam utique actu dividetur, sic enim utique corrumpetur), sic utique et tempus quaquidem continuum est, divisibile est in semper divisibilia, actu tamen non dividitur, siquidem non contingit stare motum caelestium.
¤½¤·¤Æ¶õ´ÖŪ¤ÊÂ礭¤µ¤Î¤¢¤ë¤â¤Î¤Ï³§¡¢¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë*1ʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤¦¤ë¤â¤Î¤À¤È¸À¤ï¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤¬¡¢¼Â¤Ï¤¹¤Ù¤Æ¤¬²Äʬ¤Ê¤ï¤±¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¡¢À¸À®¤·¤¿¤ê¾ÃÌǤ·¤¿¤ê¤¹¤ë¥¿¥¤¥×¤À¤±¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¡¢ÂÀÍۤΤ褦¤ÊÅ·ÂΤϡʶõ´ÖŪ¤ÊÂ礭¤µ¤Ï¤¢¤ë¤¬¡¢À¸À®¡¦¾ÃÌǤ·¤Ê¤¤±Ê±ó¤Î¸ºß¤Ç¡Ë¡¢¸½¼ÂÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ*2·è¤·¤ÆÊ¬³ä¤µ¤ì¤º¡¢¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¤ÏÌǤӤ뤳¤È¤â¤Ê¤¤¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡£
¤½¤ì¤ÈƱÍͤ˻þ´Ö¤â¡¢Ï¢Â³ÂΤȤ·¤Æ¤Ï̵¸Â¤Ëʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤ë¤â¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤¬¡¢Å·ÂΤα¿¹Ô¤¬»ß¤Þ¤ë¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¤Ïµ¯¤³¤ê¤¨¤Ê¤¤°Ê¾å¡¢¸½¼ÂÂ֤ˤª¤¤¤Æ¤Ï*2ʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤Ê¤¤¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ë*3¡£
(*1)¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë¡á´ðËÜŪ¤Ê¾õÂ֤Ȥ·¤Æ¡á´ðËÜŪ¤Ë¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦Îã¡§¡Ö¥Õ¥¡¥Ã¥·¥ç¥ó¥â¥Ç¥ë¤Ï¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë¡¢¤½¤ì¼«ÂΤȤ·¤Æ¤ÏÈþ¤·¤¤¤¬¡¢¿Í¤Î¸«Êý¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤Æ¤ÏÈþ¤·¤¯¤Ê¤¤¤È¸À¤ï¤ì¤ë¤³¤È¤â¤¢¤ë¡×¡Ö¥Õ¥¡¥Ã¥·¥ç¥ó¥â¥Ç¥ë¤Ï´ðËÜŪ¤ËÈþ¤·¤¤¤¬¡¢¤¢¤ë¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¤ÏÈþ¤·¤¯¤Ê¤¤¡×
(*2)¡á¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë
(*3)£±¡¥Å·ÂΤα¿¹Ô¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤Æ»þ´Ö¤¬Î®¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£Å·ÂΤα¿¹Ô¤Ï¡¢»ß¤Þ¤ë¤³¤È¤Ê¤¯¡¢ÀÚ¤ìÌܤ¬¤Ê¤¯¡¢¤¹¤Ê¤ï¤Áʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤Ê¤¤¡£
£²¡¥Å·ÂΤÏÉÔÌǤθºß¤Ç¤¢¤ê¡¢Ê¬³ä¤µ¤ì¤Ê¤¤¡£¤³¤¦¤¤¤¦ÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ê¸ºß¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤ÆÊݤ¿¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë»þ´Ö¤â¡¢ÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ç¤Ê¤±¤ì¤Ð¤Ê¤é¤Ê¤¤¡£
¤È¤¤¤¦£²ÅÀ¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤Æ¤³¤¦¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤Î¤À¤í¤¦¤«¡©¤Ê¤ó¤È¤Ê¤¯Û£Ëæ¤Ë¤·¤«Íý²ò¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¤Ê¡£


Hoc autem: sed qua indivisibilia, iam diximus in priori expositione, ita et nunc.
¤È¤³¤í¤Ç¤³¤Î¤³¤È¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤Ï¡¢¡Ê»þ´Ö¤Ê¤É¤¬¡ËÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤³¤È¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤Ï¡¢´û¤ËÁ°¤ÎÃí²ò¤Ç½Ò¤Ù¤¿¡£¡Öº£¡×¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤âƱÍͤζڤǽҤ٤¿¡£
Si autem non tempus untelligimus quod proprie tempus, quia in continuo et indiviso secundum actum tempore intelligit, sed nunc tempus dicit.
¤ï¤¿¤·¤¿¤Á¤Ï¡Öº£¡×¤È¤¤¤¦ËÜÍè¤Î°ÕÌ£¤Ç¤Î*1»þ´Ö¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦°ì³¤­¤Îʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤Ê¤¤»þ´Ö¤ÎÃæ¤Ç¡Öº£¡×¤Ïǧ¼±¤µ¤ì¤ë¤«¤é¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤ò¡¢»þ´Ö¤È¤Ï¹Í¤¨¤Ê¤¤¤«¤â¤·¤ì¤Ê¤¤¤±¤ì¤É¤â¡¢¥¢¥ê¥¹¥È¥Æ¥ì¥¹¤Ï¡Öº£¡×¤ò»þ´Ö¤È¹Í¤¨¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£
(*1)ËÜÍè¤Î°ÕÌ£¤Ç¤Î¡á¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ê¡¢¸½¼ÂÂÖ¤Î
Diximus qualiter nunc esse divisibile sit intelligendum, quia út principium et finem.
¤É¤¦¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¤Ç¡Öº£¡×¤¬²Äʬ¤Ê¤â¤Î¤ÈÍý²ò¤µ¤ì¤ë¤«¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤â¤ï¤¿¤·¤¿¤Á¤Ï´û¤ËÏä·¤¿¡£¤Ä¤Þ¤êƱ¤¸¡Öº£¡×¤¬¡Ê¤¢¤ë°ìÄê¤Î´ü´Ö¤Î¡Ë¡Ö¤Ï¤¸¤Þ¤ê¡×¤Ç¤â¡Ö½ª¤ï¤ê¡×¤Ç¤â¤¢¤ë¡¢¤È¤¤¤¦°ÕÌ£¤Ç²Äʬ¤Ê¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£

430 b 17-19 INEST AUTEM IN HIS ALIQUID INDIVISIBILE, SED FORTE NON SEPARABILE, QUOD FACIT UNUM TEMPUS ET LONGITUDINEM.


..........Ab hac autem utique expositione non dissonat scriptura quae dicit : in divisibili tempore et divisibili animae. Qualiter dixit tempus in quo intelligit divisibile, et qualiter partem animae subiunxit quia: secundum accidens et non sicut illa (hoc est species materiales quas intellegit). Hae quidem enim loco divisibiles erant et actu dividi possibiles ut magnitudines, hae aut ratione ut plantae, hoc quidem generativum et augmentativum et nutritivum, hae autem secundum ambo, út forma, puta quae hominis; loco enim distant partes vel aliam habent substantiae rationem. Secundum nullum igitur horum divisibilis est phantasia nisi solum secundum accidens, ut dictum est; sed neque tempus nisi potentia solum et secundum intellectum; continuum enim est et non intercisum, nostra autem meditatio est quae in annos et menses et dies et horas ipsum dividit. Non enim utique stabit aliquando sol, ut in partes dividatur tempus. Sed sicut omnis magnitudo divisibilis esse dicitur qua magnitudo est, non omnes autem actu divisae esse possunt, sed solum quae in generatione et corruptione (caelestia enim, puta sol nunquam utique actu dividetur, sic enim utique corrumpetur), sic utique et tempus quaquidem continuum est, divisibile est in semper divisibilia, actu tamen non dividitur, siquidem non contingit stare motum caelestium. Hoc autem: sed qua indivisibilia, iam diximus in priori expositione, ita et nunc. Si autem non tempus untelligimus quod proprie tempus, quia in continuo et indiviso secundum actum tempore intelligit, sed nunc tempus dicit. Diximus qualiter nunc esse divisibile sit intelligendum, quia út principium et finem.



<<keys>>

+expositio : explanation
+dissonare : be not harmonious, be different (+ab)
+scriptura : referring to the De Anima passage which he is e treating

+qualiter : in what manner, in what sense
+dixit : the subject is Aristoteles
+et qualiter partem animae : =et qualiter dixit partem animae divisiblem
+subjungo : put or joint from under = put (an explanation) below in the subsequent passages
+quia : that (conjunction)
+species materiales : for a detailed explanation of this see the latter passages of the previous section.

+hae : =species materiales
+hoc quidem : =hoc quidem est (that is to say)
+secundum ambo : =loco et ratione (in space/place and in definition)
+quae : relative pronoun referring to "forma", but here, it has to be read in the Greek manner "quae hominis" = "quae hominis forma" (the form of human being)
+distare : be apart / be different

+secundum nullum horum : referring to "secundum locum" and "secundum rationem" above
+neque tempus : =neque tempus est divisibile
+secundum intellectum : according to the intellectual perceiving
+intercisum : past partisiple of "intercido" (cut apart, cut asunder)
+meditatio : mental, intellectual activity, mental, intellectual perception, thinking, thought
+ipsum : =tempus

+Non enim utique stabit aliquando sol, ut in partes dividatur tempus.: "for, the sun will never stop, though the time is divided into parts."..............this sentence is difficult, but its meaning is revealed in the following passage.

+qua : inasmuch as
+omnes : =omnes magnitudines
+solum quae : =solum magnitudines quae.......
+quaquidem : ="qua" above
+divisibile est in semper divisibilia : this "semper" probably means "ad infinitum"
+stare : get unmoving, stop

+sed qua indivisibilia : ="Hoc" in the beginning of this sentence.
+qua indivisibilia : =qua tempus et omnes magnitudines sunt indivisibilia
+jam diximus : we have already told
+ita et nunce : and in this sense the "now" too is indivisibile ("now" is here a noun, not an adverb)

+Si : even if, although
+Si autem non tempus untelligimus quod proprie tempus, quia in continuo et indiviso secundum actum tempore intelligit, sed nunc tempus dicit. : although we understand what is in a proper sense "time" (=the "now") as not "time", because one perceives it (the "now") in a continuous and in an at the moment undivided time, nontheless Aristotle counts the "now" as a kind of "time" .
+nunc tempus dicit : Aristotle calls the "now" a kind of time, Aristotle counts the "now" as a kind of time

+nunc : the "now" ("now" as a noun)
+ut principium et finem : "now" as a beginning of certain period of time, and as an end of certain period of time

ÆÉ²ò¤Î¤·¤«¤¿¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤ÏÁ°¤ÎÅê¹Æ¤ò¸«¤Æ¤¯¤À¤µ¤¤¡£http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/dakuserukun/35208611.html


430 b 17-19 INEST AUTEM IN HIS ALIQUID INDIVISIBILE, SED FORTE NON SEPARABILE, QUOD FACIT UNUM TEMPUS ET LONGITUDINEM.




...............Et aliter autem exponunt praemissa loca.
¾å¤Î¥Ç¡¦¥¢¥Ë¥Þ¤Î²Õ½ê¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤Ï¡¢¿Í¡¹¤Ï¤Þ¤¿Ê̤Τ·¤«¤¿¤Ç¤âÀâÌÀ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£
Intelligit enim, aiunt, species intellectus, aut ut materiales entes, aut separate ipsam substantiae rationem ipsarum.
¤Ä¤Þ¤êÈà¤é¤Î¸À¤¦¤Ë¤Ï¡¢ÃÎÀ­¤Ï¼ï*1¤òǧ¼±¤¹¤ë¤È¤­¡¢¼ÁÎÁŪ¤Ê¸ºß*2¤È¤·¤ÆÇ§¼±¤¹¤ë¤³¤È¤â¤¢¤ë¤·¡¢¼ï¤Î¼ÂÂΤÎÄêµÁ*3¤òǧ¼±¤¹¤ë¤³¤È¤â¤¢¤ë¡£
(*1)¼ï¡á·ÁÁê¡áËܼÁ¡á¼ÂÂΡá¼ÂÂΤÎÄêµÁ¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¥¢¥ê¥¹¥È¥Æ¥ì¥¹¡Ø·Á¼©¾å³Ø¡Ù¤è¤ê¡£
(*2)¼ï¤¬¼ÁÎÁ¤ÎÃæ¤ËÆâºß¤¹¤ë¾õÂÖ¡£
(*3)¼ï¤Î¼ÂÂΤȤϡ¢¼ï¤½¤Î¤â¤Î¤Î¤³¤È¡£¼ÁÎÁ¤ËÆâºß¤¹¤ë¤È¤¤¤¦¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¤Î¼ï¤ËÂФ·¤Æ¡¢Ìµ¾ò·ï¤Ç¤Î¼ï¤Î¤³¤È¡£ÄêµÁ¤Ï¼ÂÂΡ¦ËܼÁ¤òɽ¤¹Ì¿Âê¡£
Quando quidem igitur intelligit ipsas ut materiales entes cum forma videlicet et figura aliqua, phantastica parte ut organo utens, sic ipsas intelligit.
¤Ç¡¢ÃÎÀ­¤¬¼ï¤ò·ÁÁꡦ¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¤³¤³¤Ç¤Ï²¿¤é¤«¤Î·ÁÂÖ¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤ò¤È¤â¤Ê¤Ã¤¿¼ÁÎÁŪ¸ºß¤È¤·¤ÆÇ§¼±¤¹¤ë¤È¤­¤Ï¡¢¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò°·¤¦Î¤ÎÉôʬ*1¤òÆ»¶ñ¤È¤·¤Æ»È¤Ã¤ÆÇ§¼±¤¹¤ë¡£
(*1)»ë³ÐŪ¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¡¢Ä°³ÐŪ¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¡¢Ó̳ÐŪ¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤Ê¤É¤ò¿´¤ÎÃæ¤ËÉ⤫¤Ù¤ëǽÎϤΤ³¤È¡£¤½¤·¤Æ¤Ü¤¯¤Î¹Í¤¨¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¤³¤¦¤·¤¿´¶³ÐŪ¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤À¤±¤Ç¤Ê¤¯¡¢¤Þ¤À¸ÀÍդˤµ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Ê¤¤»×¹Í¤ò¡¢¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤È¤·¤ÆÉ⤫¤Ù¤ëǽÎϤǤⰿ¤ë¡£



Haec igitur phantastica animae pars secundum se quidem est indivisibilis; neque enim, ut continua, loco dividitur neque ratione.
¤Ç¡¢¤³¤Î¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò¤Ä¤«¤µ¤É¤ëÎÉôʬ¤Ï¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë¤ÏÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£¤Ä¤Þ¤êϢ³ÂΤΤ褦¤Ë¶õ´ÖŪ¤Ë*1ʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¤·¡¢¼ÂÂΤÎÄêµÁ¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¤âʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¤«¤é¡£
(*1)Ϣ³ÂΤȤϤĤޤêŤµ¤Î¤¢¤ë¤â¤Î¡£Î㤨¤ÐIJ¤È¤«¿´Â¡¡£Ä²¤È¤«¿´Â¡¤È¤«¤Ï¶õ´ÖŪ¡¦¾ì½êŪ¤Ëʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤ë¡£
Non enim differentes quae substantiae phantastici rationes neque in differentes rationes dividi potest, sicut alia quidem nutritivi ratio, alia autem generativi vel augmentativi.
¤Ä¤Þ¤ê*1¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò°·¤¦Éôʬ¤Î¼ÂÂΤÎÄêµÁ¤¬¤¤¤í¤¤¤íÊ£¿ô¤¢¤ë¤ï¤±¤Ç¤Ê¤¤¤·¡¢¤¤¤í¤¤¤íÊ£¿ô¤Î¾®ÄêµÁ¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦±ÉÍÜÀݼèÉôʬ¤ÎÄêµÁ¤È¤«¡¢À¸¿£Éôʬ¤ÎÄêµÁ¤ä¿ÈÂΤòÀ®Ä¹¤µ¤»¤ëÉôʬ¤ÎÄêµÁ¤È¤«*2¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¤Ø¤Èʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤ë¤ï¤±¤Ç¤â¤Ê¤¤¤«¤é¤À¡£
(*1)Á°Ê¸¤Î¡Ö¼ÂÂΤÎÄêµÁ¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¤âʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¡×¤ÎÀâÌÀ¡£
(*2)¤Á¤Ê¤ß¤Ë¤³¤ì¤é¤ÎÉôʬ¤âÎ¤ÎÉôʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£


Est igitur secundum se indivisibile, secundum accidens autem divisibile.
¤³¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ë¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò°·¤¦Éôʬ¤Ï¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë*1ÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤¬¡¢ÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ë¤Ï*2²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£
(*1)¡á´ðËÜŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç¡£Ìµ¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¡£¡Ö¥µ¥ë¤È¤¤¤¦¸ì¤Ï´ðËÜŪ¤Ë¤Ïưʪ¤Î±î¤ò»Ø¤¹¡£¡×¡Ö¤ª¤Þ¤ó¤¸¤å¤¦¤È¤¤¤¦¸ì¤Ï´ðËÜŪ¤Ë¤Ï²Û»Ò¤Î¤Þ¤ó¤¸¤å¤¦¤ò»Ø¤¹¡£¡×
(*2)¡áÈó´ðËÜŪ¤Ê°ÕÌ£¤Ç¡£°¿¤ë¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¡£¡Ö¥µ¥ë¤È¤¤¤¦¸ì¤Ï°¿¤ë¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¤Ï¿Í¤ò»Ø¤¹¡£¡×¡Ö¤ª¤Þ¤ó¤¸¤å¤¦¤È¤¤¤¦¸ì¤Ï°¿¤ë¾ò·ï²¼¤Ç¤Ï½÷À­¤Î¤¢¤½¤³¤ò»Ø¤¹¡£¡×
Ut enim album secundum accidens moveri dicitur, eo quod corpus movetur in quo est album,
Î㤨¤ÐÇò¤È¤¤¤¦¿§¤â¡Ê¿§¤Ï¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë¤Ïư¤¯¤â¤Î¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¤¬¡ËÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ë¤Ïư¤¯¤È¸À¤¤¤¦¤ë¡£¤Ä¤Þ¤êÇò¿§¤Î½É¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ëʪÂΡʡáÇò¤¤ÊªÂΡˤ¬Æ°¤¯¾ì¹ç¤Ï¡£
sic autem et phantasia secundum accidens dicetur divisibilis utique eo quod species quae fiunt in ipsa divisibile sint vel loco ut figurae, aut etiam ratione ut forma et si quid tale: alia enim ratio oculi, et alia naris et reliquorum.
¤½¤ì¤ÈƱ¤¸¤è¤¦¤Ë¡¢¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò¤Ä¤«¤µ¤É¤ëÎÉôʬ¤âÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ë¤Ï²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤È¸À¤¨¤ë¡£¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¤³¤ó¤Ê¤Õ¤¦¤Ë¹Í¤¨¤¿¾ì¹ç¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò°·¤¦Éôʬ¤ËÀ¸¤¸¤Æ¤¯¤ë¼ï*1¤¬¡¢·ÁÂ֤Ȥ·¤Æ¶õ´ÖŪ¤Ëʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤ë¤â¤Î¤À¤Ã¤¿¤ê*2¡¢¤É¤ó¤Ê»Ñ·Á¤«¤È¤¤¤¦»ëÅÀ¤ÇÄêµÁ¤·¤¿¤È¤­¡¢¤½¤ÎÄêµÁ¤¬ÌܤÎÄêµÁ¤È¤«É¡¤ÎÄêµÁ¤È¤«¤Ëʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤¿¤ê¤¹¤ë*3¡£
(*1)¡á¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸
(*2)Î㤨¤Ð´ÝÂÀ¤Î¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤¬É⤫¤ó¤À¤È¤­¡¢´ÝÂÀ¤Ï¶õ´ÖŪ¡¦¾ì½êŪ¤Ëʬ³ä¤Ç¤­¤ë¤â¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£
(*3)Î㤨¤Ð·ª¸¶·ÃÁª¼ê¤Î´é¤Î¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤¬É⤫¤ó¤À¤È¤­¡¢¤½¤Î´é¤¬¤É¤ó¤Ê¤«¤òÉÁ¼Ì¤¹¤ë¤Ê¤é¤Ð¡¢¤½¤ÎÉÁ¼Ì¤ÏÌܤÎÉÁ¼Ì¤äÉ¡¤ÎÉÁ¼Ì¤Ëʬ³ä¤µ¤ì¤ë¡£


Quod autem secundum se indivisibilis phantasia sit, palam ex memoria et ex eo quod non confunduntur theorematum simulacra.
¤·¤«¤·¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò°·¤¦ÎÉôʬ¤¬¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë¤ÏÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤³¤È¤Ï¡¢µ­²±¤È¡¢»×¹Í¤Îµ­¹æ²½¤µ¤ì¤¿¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸*1¤¬¸ß¤¤¤Ë¤´¤Ã¤Á¤ã¤Ë¤Ê¤é¤Ê¤¤¤Ç¤³¤ÎÎÉôʬ¤ÎÃæ¤ËÊݸ¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤³¤È¤ò¹Í¤¨¤ì¤ÐÌÀ¤é¤«¤Ç¤¢¤í¤¦¡£
(*1)simulacrum ¤Ï"representation" ¤À¤«¤é¡¢¡Öɽ¾Ý¡×¤ÈÌõ¤»¤ë¤À¤í¤¦¡£¤Ç¡¢Âç¤Þ¤«¤Ë¸À¤Ã¤Æ¡¢É½¾Ý¡á´Ñǰ¡á¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¡£¡Öµ­¹æ²½¤µ¤ì¤¿¡×¤È¤·¤¿¤Î¤Ï¡¢É½¾Ý¤Ï»×¹Í¤¬¤¤¤ï¤Ðµ­¹æ²½¤µ¤ì¤¿¤â¤Î¤À¤«¤é¡£theorematum simulacra ¤Ï¤¿¤À¡Ö»×¹Í¤Î¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¡×¤ÈÌõ¤·¤¿¤«¤Ã¤¿¤±¤ì¤É¡¢¤½¤ì¤À¤È¸ÀÍÕ¤¬Â­¤ê¤Ê¤¯¤ÆÍý²ò¤·¤Ë¤¯¤¤¤À¤í¤¦¤Ê¤È»×¤Ã¤Æ¡£
Et quidem si in eodem scripturali duo theoremata scriberentur, confunduntur simulacra amborum.
¤Þ¤¿¤Á¤ç¤Ã¤È¹Í¤¨¤Æ¤Û¤·¤¤¤Î¤À¤¬¡¢¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦¡¦Æ±°ì¤Îʸ¾Ï¤¬£²¤Ä¤Î°Û¤Ê¤Ã¤¿»×¹Í¤ò´Þ¤à¤³¤È¤Ï²Äǽ¤À¤±¤ì¤É¤â¡¢¤³¤Îʸ¾Ï¤òÆÉ¤à¿Í¤¬¼õ¤±¼è¤ë¤½¤ì¤é¤Î¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤Ï¤´¤Ã¤Á¤ã¤Ë¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤·¤Þ¤¦¡£
Quare secundum indivisibilitatem suam phantasia inconfusa simulacra conservat.
¤½¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ë¡¢¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò°·¤¦Éôʬ¤Ï¤½¤ì¼«ÂΤÎÉÔ²ÄʬÀ­¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤Æ¡¢»×¹Í¤Îµ­¹æ²½¤µ¤ì¤¿¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò¡¢¤´¤Ã¤Á¤ã¤Ë¤Ê¤é¤Ê¤¤¤è¤¦Êݸ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£

Hac igitur phantasia secundum se existente quidem indivisibili, secundum accidens autem divisibili, species materiales cognoscit intellectus;
¤È¤¤¤¦¤ï¤±¤Ç¡¢¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò°·¤¦ÎÉôʬ¤¬¼«ÂÎŪ¤Ë¤ÏÉÔ²Äʬ¤Ë¡¢ÉÕÂÓŪ¤Ë¤Ï²Äʬ¤Ê¤â¤Î¤È¤·¤Æ¤¢¤ë¡¢¤½¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ê¾õ¶·¤Î¾å¤Ç¡¢ÃÎÀ­¤Ï¼ÁÎÁŪ¤Ê¼ï*1¤òǧ¼±¤¹¤ë¤Î¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£
(*1)¼ÁÎÁŪ¤Ê¼ï¡á¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¡£¤¢¤é¤æ¤ë´¶³ÐŪ¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤È¡¢¾å¤Ë½Ð¤Æ¤­¤¿ theorematum simulacra¡Ê»×¹Í¤Îµ­¹æ²½¤µ¤ì¤¿¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¡Ë¡£¤Ç¡¢¤³¤ì¤é¤Ï¡áµ­²±¡£
abstractas tamen ipsarum rationes intellectus ipse secundum se intelligit sine phantasia; sine enim typo et magnitudine intelligit ipsas essentiales rationes ipsorum.
¤·¤«¤·¤³¤ì¤é¤Î¼ï¤Î¡¢¼ÁÎÁ¤ò¼è¤êʧ¤Ã¤¿¼ÂÂÎ*1¤ò¡¢¤½¤ì¼«ÂΤǡ¢¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ò°·¤¦ÎÉôʬ¤Î½õ¤±¤ò¼Ú¤ê¤º¤Ë¡¢ÃÎÀ­¤Ïǧ¼±¤Ç¤­¤ë¡£¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¤ä¶õ´ÖŪÂ礭¤µ¤ò¼Î¾Ý¤·¤Æ¡¢ËܼÁ¤ÎÄêµÁ*2¤À¤±¤òǧ¼±¤¹¤ë¡£
(*1)¾å¤Î¡Ö¼ÁÎÁŪ¤Ê¼ï¡×¤Ï·ª¸¶Áª¼ê¤Î¡ÊÎ㤨¤Ð»ë³ÐŪ¡Ë¥¤¥á¡¼¥¸¡£¡Ö¼ÁÎÁ¤ò¼è¤êʧ¤Ã¤¿¼ï¡×¤Ï·ª¸¶Áª¼ê¤Î¼ÂÂΡ¢·ª¸¶Áª¼ê¤ÎËܼÁ¡£
(*2)ËܼÁ¤Î¡ÖÄêµÁ¡×¤Ï¡¢ËܼÁ¤ò¸ÀÍÕ¤Çɽ¤·¤¿¤â¤Î¤À¤«¤é¡¢ËܼÁ¼«ÂΤǤϤʤ¤¤Î¤À¤¬¡¢¸ÅÂå¤Î¥¢¥ê¥¹¥È¥Æ¥ì¥¹¤¿¤Á¤ÏËܼÁ¤ÈƱ°ì»ë¤·¤Æ¤·¤Þ¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤¿¡£









º£Æü¤Î¸Ä½ê¤ÎÍý²ò¤Î»²¹Í¤Ë¡£
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/53828401.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/54132044.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/54100755.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/54607503.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/54521082.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/55807995.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/57270293.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/56528863.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/54054047.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/56770601.html
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ojunyaman/58303058.html

Á´2¥Ú¡¼¥¸

[1] [2]

[ ¼¡¤Î¥Ú¡¼¥¸ ]


.
¥À¥¯¥»¥ë¤¯¤ó
¥À¥¯¥»¥ë¤¯¤ó
ÃËÀ­ / AB·¿
¿Íµ¤ÅÙ
Yahoo!¥Ö¥í¥°¥Ø¥ë¥× - ¥Ö¥í¥°¿Íµ¤Å٤ˤĤ¤¤Æ
Æü ·î ²Ð ¿å ÌÚ ¶â ÅÚ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

Yahoo!¤«¤é¤Î¤ªÃΤ餻

²áµî¤Îµ­»ö°ìÍ÷

¸¡º÷ ¸¡º÷

¤è¤·¤â¤È¥Ö¥í¥°¥é¥ó¥­¥ó¥°

¤â¤Ã¤È¸«¤ë

[PR]¤ªÆÀ¾ðÊó

¿ôÎ̸ÂÄꡪ¥¤¥ª¥ó¤ª¤Þ¤È¤á´ë²è
¡Ö̵ÎÁ¤ª»î¤·¥¯¡¼¥Ý¥ó¡×¤«
¡ÖÃͰú¤­¥¯¡¼¥Ý¥ó¡×¤¬É¬¤ºÅö¤¿¤ë¡ª
CM¤ÇÏÃÂê¤Î¤Õ¤ë¤µ¤ÈǼÀÇ¥µ¥¤¥È¤µ¤È¤Õ¤ë
ËèÆü¤ªÎéÉÊ¥é¥ó¥­¥ó¥°¹¹¿·Ã桪
2019ǯ¤Î¤Õ¤ë¤µ¤ÈǼÀǤϢã12¡¿31¤Þ¤Ç¢ä

¤½¤Î¾¤Î¥­¥ã¥ó¥Ú¡¼¥ó


¤ß¤ó¤Ê¤Î¹¹¿·µ­»ö