¤³¤³¤«¤éËÜʸ¤Ç¤¹
GOING EXTRA MILE - ±Ñ¸ì¤ò³Ø¤Ö¥í¥°¢ö
±Ñ¸ì¤òÃÏÆ»¤ËÊÙ¶¯¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£

½ñ¸Ë±Ññ¸ì

µ­»ö¸¡º÷
¸¡º÷
 
¥¯¥é¥¯¥é¤Ï¾¦¼Ò¶Ð̳¤Ç¤¹¤¬¡¢¤Þ¤º¶µ¤¨¤é¤ì¤ë¤³¤È¤Ï¡Ö¥Ô¥ó¥Á¤Ï¥Á¥ã¥ó¥¹¡×¤Ë¤¹¤Ù¤­¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¡£
ž¤ó¤Ç¤â¥¿¥À¤Ç¤Ïµ¯¤­¤Ê¤¤¡£
 
¤À¤«¤é¡¢¾¦¼Ò¶È³¦¤Ç¤Ï¡¢·¤¤òÇä¤ê¤Ë¹Ô¤Ã¤Æ¡¢100¿Í¤Î·¤¤òÍú¤«¤Ê¤¤Ì¤³«¿Í¤Î¼¤¬¤¢¤Ã¤¿¤é¡¢¡Ö·¤¤òÍú¤¯½¬´·¤¬¤Ê¤¤¤Î¤ÇÇä¤ì¤Þ¤»¤ó¡×¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¤Æ¡Ö100¿Í¤Î¿·¤·¤¤¼ûÍפ¬¤¢¤ê¤Þ¤¹¡ª¡×¤È´¿´î¤¹¤ë¤Î¤¬Àµ¤·¤¤¤ï¤±¤Ç¤¹¡£
 
º£¡¢À¤³¦¤ÇºÇ¤â¾¦º²¤¿¤¯¤Þ¤·¤¤¤Î¤Ï¡¢NRA(Á´Êƥ饤¥Õ¥ë¶¨²ñ)¤Ç¤·¤ç¤¦¤Í¡£
 
½Æµ¬À©¤Ë¶¨ÎϤ¹¤ë¤É¤³¤í¤«¡¢¤Þ¤µ¤«¡¢³Ø¹»¤âÉðÁõ¤·¤è¤¦¤È¸À¤¤½Ð¤¹¤È¤ÏÌ´¤Ë¤â»×¤¤¤Þ¤»¤ó¤Ç¤·¤¿¤è¡£
¤½¤ì¤Ç¤Þ¤¿²Ô¤®¤¬Áý¤¨¤ë¤ï¤±¤Ç¤¹¤Í¡£
 
 

N.R.A. Envisions ¡Æa Good Guy With a Gun¡Ç in Every School

 
December 21, 2012  The New York Times
 
WASHINGTON After a weeklong silence, the National Rifle Association
announced Friday that it wants to arm security officers at every school in the
country. It pointed the finger at violent video games, the news media and lax
law enforcement
not guns as culprits in the recent rash of mass shootings.
 
*culprit/kˈʌlprɪt/Èȿ͡¤ÈȺá¼Ô
 
¡ÈThe only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,¡É
Wayne LaPierre, the N.R.A. vice president, said at a media event that was
interrupted by protesters. One held up a banner saying,
¡ÈN.R.A. Killing Our Kids.¡É
The N.R.A.¡Çs plan for countering school shootings, coming a week after the
massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was met with
widespread derision from school administrators, law enforcement officials and
politicians, with some critics calling it
¡Èdelusional¡É and ¡Èparanoid.¡É
Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, a Republican, said arming schools would not
make them safer.

Even conservative politicians who had voiced support this week for arming more
school officers did not rush to embrace the N.R.A.¡Çs plan.
Their reluctance was an indication of just how toxic the gun debate has become
after the Connecticut shootings, as gun control advocates push for tougher
restrictions.
Nationwide, at least 23,000 schools about one-third of all public schools
already had armed security on staff as of the most recent data, for the
2009-10 school year, and a number of states and districts that do not use
them have begun discussing the idea in recent days.
Even so, the N. R. A¡Çs focus on armed guards as its prime solution to school
shootings
and the group¡Çs offer to help develop and carry out such a program
nationwide
rankled a number of lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
¡örankle/rˈæŋkl/¡Òº¨¤ß¤Ê¤É¤¬¡Ó¡Ì¿Í¤Î¡Í¿´¤Ë¿©¤¤¹þ¤à¡Ìwith¡Í.¡¡What he said still rankles with me. Èब¸À¤Ã¤¿¤³¤È¤¬¤Þ¤À»ä¤Î¿´¤Ë¤ï¤À¤«¤Þ¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë.
 
 
¡ÈAnyone who thought the N.R.A. was going to come out today and make a
common-sense statement about meaningful reform and safety was kidding
themselves,
¡É said Representative Mike Quigley, an Illinois Democrat, who has
called for new restrictions on assault rifles.
Mr. LaPierre struck a defiant tone on Friday, making clear that his group was
not eager to reach a conciliation. With the N.R.A. not making any statements
after last week
¡Çs shootings, both supporters and opponents of greater gun
control had been looking to its announcement Friday as a sign of how the
nation
¡Çs most influential gun lobby group would respond and whether it would
pledge to work with President Obama and Congress in developing new gun
control measures.

*
defiant¡¡/dɪfάɪənt/¡¡È¿¹³Åª¤Ê, ¤±¤ó¤«¹ø¤Î, ÐþËý(¤´¤¦¤Þ¤ó)¤Ê
 
Mr. LaPierre offered no support for any of the proposals made in the last week,
like banning assault rifles or limiting high-capacity ammunition, and N.R.A.
leaders declined to answer questions. As reporters shouted out to Mr. LaPierre
and David Keene, the group
¡Çs president, asking whether they planned to work
with Mr. Obama, the men walked off stage without answering.
 
°Ê²¼Î¬
 
 
¥à¥¹¥á³¨93
イメージ 1
 

NRA¤È¤Ï¡©

 

Ãæ¹ñ/´Ú¹ñ¤Ï¼«Ì±ÅÞÀ¯¸¢ÃÂÀ¸¤ò¶Ë±¦ extreme right ¤Ã¤Æ¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤Þ¤¹¤¬¡¢¤µ¤¹¤¬¤Ë¤½¤ó¤Ê¤³¤È¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¤Ç¤·¤ç¤¦¡£
3¿Í¤Î³°Ìî¼ê¤¬Á´°÷¥ì¥Õ¥È¤ò¼é¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤¿¾õÂÖ¤«¤é¡¢¥Õ¥Ä¡¼¤Î¼éÈ÷°ÌÃÖ¤ËÌá¤Ã¤¿¤¯¤é¤¤¤È»×¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
 
 
¤µ¤Æ¤µ¤Æ¡¢NRA¤È¸À¤¨¤Ð¡¦¡¦¡©
 
°ìÈ֤褯¼ª¤Ë¤¹¤ë¤Î¤Ï¡¡National Rifle Association¡¡Á´Êƥ饤¥Õ¥ë¶¨²ñ¤Ç¤¹¤Í¡£¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤Î¡¡½Æ°¦¹¥²È¤Î»Ô̱ÃÄÂΡ¢¤È¤¤¤¦¤Î¤Ï²¾¤Î»Ñ¤Ç¡¢»ö¼Â¾å¤Î°µÎÏÃÄÂΡÊÍø±×ÃÄÂΡˤǤ¹¤Í¡£¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤Ç²¿¿Í¤¬½Æ¤Îµ¾À·¤Ë¤Ê¤í¤¦¤È¤â¡¢½Æ½êÍ­¤Ï¹ṉ̃¤Î¸¢Íø¤À¤È¸À¤¤Ä¥¤Ã¤ÆÍø±×¤ò¾å¤²¤Æ¤­¤¿ÃÄÂΤǤ¹¡£
 
Ë­¿Ã½¨µÈ¤ß¤¿¤¤¤Ê¤Î¤¬½Ð¤Ê¤¤¤È¡ÖÅá¼í¤ê¡×¤Ï¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¤ó¤Ç¤·¤ç¤¦¤Í¡£
 
 
normal retirement age¡¡Ä̾ïÂ࿦ǯÎð(ǯ¶âµëÉպ︺¤¬¹Ô¤ï¤ì¤Ê¤¤ºÇÄãǯÎð)¤Ã¤Æ¤Î¤â¤¢¤ê¤Þ¤¹¤¬¡¢¤¢¤Þ¤êʹ¤­¤Þ¤»¤ó¡£
 
¤½¤·¤Æ¡¢¸¶»ÒÎÏ´ØÏ¢¤ÇNRA¤È½Ð¤¿¤é¡¢ÆüËܤ˿·¤·¤¯¤Ç¤­¤¿
 
Nuclear Regulation Authority
¸¶»ÒÎϵ¬À©°Ñ°÷²ñ
 
 
¤Ç¤¹¤Í¡£
 
µ¬À©¤ÎÀìÌç²È½¸ÃĤȤ¤¤¦¤è¤ê¡¢¸½¼ÂÎ¥¤ì¤·¤¿³Ø¼Ô½¸ÃĤäƴ¶¤¸¤Ç¤É¤¦¤â¹¥¤­¤Ë¤Ï¤Ê¤ì¤ó¤Ç¤¹¡£
 
 
 イメージ 1
 
¤½¤ì¤Ç¤Ï¡£
ñ¤Ê¤ëÀ¯ÅޤαѸì̾¤ÎÀ°Íý¤Ç¤¹¡£³ÆÅÞHP¤ä±Ñ»ú¿·Ê¹¤«¤é½¦¤¤¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£
¥³¥í¥³¥íÊѤï¤ë¤«¤é¡¢ËèÆüUpdate¤·¤Ê¤¤¤È¤¤¤±¤Ê¤¤¤«¤â¤Ç¤¹¡¦¡¦(^_^;)
 
½°µÄ±¡Áªµó¤Ï2012ǯ¡ÊÊ¿À®24ǯ¡Ë12·î16Æü¡¡¤Ç¤¹¤Í¡£



¼«Í³Ì±¼çÅÞ¡¡¡¡Liberal Democratic Party¡ÊLDP¡Ë

̱¼çÅÞ¡¡The Democratic Party of Japan¡¡¡ÊDPJ¡Ë

¸øÌÀÅÞ¡¡¡¡
New Komeito

ÆüËܰݿ·¤Î²ñ¡¡
Japan Restoration Party

¹ṉ̃¤ÎÀ¸³è¤¬Âè°ì ¡¡
People's Life First

¤ß¤ó¤Ê¤ÎÅÞ¡¡¡¡
Your Party

¼Ò²ṉ̃¼çÅÞ¡¡Social Democratic Party¡¡¡ÊSDP¡Ë


ÆüËܶ¦»ºÅÞ¡¡
Japanese Communist Party

¹ṉ̃¿·ÅÞ¡¡
The People's New Party

ÆüËṲ̈Íè¤ÎÅÞ ¡¡Japan Future Party

¤ß¤É¤ê¤ÎÉ÷ Green Breeze Party

¿·ÅÞ²þ³×¡¡New Renaissance Party, NRP
 
 
 
²áµî¤ÎÀ¯ÅÞ¡Ê»²¹Í¡Ë

¸ºÀÇÆüËÜ¡¡Tax Reduction Japan

¿·ÅÞ¤­¤Å¤Ê¡¡Shintō Kizuna
 
ÂÀÍÛ¤ÎÅÞ¡¡Sunrise Party

ÎФÎÅÞ¡¡Green Party
 
¤¿¤Á¤¢¤¬¤ìÆüËÜ The Sunrise Party of Japan
 
¿·ÅÞÂçÃÏ¡¦¿¿Ì±¼ç¡¡New Party Daichi – True Democrats

È¿TPP¡¦Ã¦¸¶È¯¡¦¾ÃÈñÁýÀÇÅà·ë¤ò¼Â¸½¤¹¤ëÅÞ ¡¡¡¡Anti-TPP, Anti-Nuclear,
¡¡¡¡Consumption Tax Hike Freeze Realization Party
 
¿·ÅÞÆüËÜ¡¡New Party Nippon, NPN
 
¿·¿ÊÅÞ¡¡New Frontier Party¡¢NFP

̱¼ÒÅÞ¡¡Democratic Socialist Party, DSP

¿·À¸ÅÞ¡¡Japan Renewal Party, JRP

¿·ÅÞ¤µ¤­¤¬¤±¡¡New Party Sakigake, NPS

ÆüËÜ¿·ÅÞ¡¡Japan New Party, JNP

 
(½çÉÔÆ±¡Ë




´×ÏõÙÂê¡£¡¡¡¡¥¤¥Á¥í¡¼¤Î¼ê»æ
Amy Franz ¡¡@ichimeterlady¡¡¤µ¤ó¤¢¤Æ¼ê»æ¤¬½Ð¤Æ¤Þ¤¹¤Í¡£
 
¤³¤Á¤é¡¡¤«¤é¡£
 
イメージ 1
 
·¤¤ä¥Ð¥Ã¥È¤Ï¡¡¤³¤Á¤é¡¡¡£
 
¥¯¥é¥¯¥é¤è¤ê»ú¤â±Ñ¸ì¤â¾å¼ê¤Ç¤¹¡¦¡¦¡¦¡ÊÉ顦¡¦¡Ë

(±Ññ¸ì¡Ë¥³¥ó¥»¥ó¥È

 
 
 
ñ¤Ê¤ëÀ°Íý¡£
 
»÷¤¿¤â¤Î¡£¡£¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤¦¤«»÷¤¹¤®¡£
receptacle /rɪséptəkl/¡¡ÍÆ´ï

receptable
¥³¥ó¥»¥ó¥È

respectable /rɪspéktəbl/
º·É¤Ç¤­¤ë

resettable
ºÆÀßÄê²Äǽ¤Ê

resectable
ÀÚ½ü²Äǽ¤Ê


 
¥³¥ó¥»¥ó¥È¤È¤¤¤¨¤Ð¡¢Åµ·¿Åª¤ÊÏÂÀ½±Ñ¸ì¤Ç¤¹¤Í¡£
 
±ÑÌõ¤»¤è¡£
¡Ö¥³¥ó¥»¥ó¥È¤òÈ´¤¯¤Î¤Ë¥³¡¼¥É¤ò°ú¤ÃÄ¥¤ë¤Ê¡ª¡×
 
¤³¤ó¤Ê´¶¤¸¤Ç¤¹¤«¤Í¡£

Don¡Çt remove the plug from the outlet by pulling the cord.
 
¤³¤¦¤¤¤¦À¸³èÌ©Ãå·¿ÍѸì¤Ï¥¯¥é¥¯¥é¤Ï¼å¤¤¤Ç¤¹¡¦¡¦¡¦¡ÊÃÑ¡Ë
 
 
 
 
³¨84

イメージ 1
 

ºâÀ¯¤Î³³¡¡Fiscal Cliff

 
ºâÀ¯¤Î³³fiscal cliff

¥Ö¥Ã¥·¥å¸ºÀǤǺâÀ¯ÀÖ»ú¤¬ËĤé¤ó¤À¡£¤½¤Î¤¿¤á2013ǯ¤«¤éºÐ½Ð¤ò¸º¤é¤¹Ë¡Î§¤¬¤Ç¤­¤¿¡£ÁýÀǤdz³¤«¤éÍî¤Á¤ë¤è¤¦¤Ë·Êµ¤°­²½¤¬·üǰ¤µ¤ì¤ë¤³¤È¤ò¤¤¤¦¡£ºÇ½éFRB¤Î¥Ð¡¼¥Ê¥ó¥­
BernankeµÄŤ¬»È¤Ã¤¿¡£
 
 
¡ÖºâÀ¯¤Î³³¡×ǯÆâ²óÈò¤Ç¹ç°Õ¡¡ÊÆÂçÅýÎΡ¢½é¤ÎÍ¿ÌîÅÞ¶¨µÄ
 
¡¡¡Ú¥ï¥·¥ó¥È¥ó¡á»³Àî°ì´ð¡Û¥ª¥Ð¥ÞÊÆÂçÅýÎΤÈÊÆÍ¿ÌîÅޤδ´Éô¤¬£±£¶Æü¡¢ÊƷкѤ˿¼¹ï¤Ê±Æ¶Á¤òÍ¿¤¨¤«¤Í¤Ê¤¤¡ÖºâÀ¯¤Î³³¡×¤ò¤á¤°¤Ã¤ÆÂçÅýÎÎÁª¸å¡¢½é¤á¤Æ¶¨µÄ¤·¤¿¡£¸ß¤¤¤ËÊâ¤ß´ó¤ê¡¢Ç¯Ëö¤Þ¤Ç¤Ë¡Ö³³¡×¤ò²óÈò¤¹¤ëÊýË¡¤òÂǤÁ½Ð¤¹¤³¤È¤Ç¹ç°Õ¤·¤¿¡£
 
¡¡¶¦ÏÂÅޤΥ٥¤¥Ê¡¼²¼±¡µÄĹ¡¢¥Þ¥³¥Í¥ë¾å±¡±¡ÆâÁí̳¡¢Ì±¼çÅޤΥ꡼¥É¡¢¥Ú¥í¥·¾å²¼±¡ÆâÁí̳¤¬¥Û¥ï¥¤¥È¥Ï¥¦¥¹¤òˬ¤Í¡¢Ìó£±»þ´Ö¡¢¥ª¥Ð¥Þ»á¤ÈÏä·¹ç¤Ã¤¿¡£
 
¡¡²ñÃ̤ÎËÁƬ¤Ç¥ª¥Ð¥ÞÂçÅýÎΤϡֲ桹¤Ï¶¨ÎϤ·¡¢ÂŶ¨¤·¤Ê¤±¤ì¤Ð¤Ê¤é¤Ê¤¤¡×¤È¸Æ¤Ó¤«¤±¤¿¡£¥Ù¥¤¥Ê¡¼»á¤Ï²ñÃ̸塢µ­¼ÔÃĤËÂФ·¡ÖÈó¾ï¤Ë·úÀßŪ¤Ê²ñ¹ç¤À¤Ã¤¿¡£»ä¤ÏÀÇÀ©²þ³×¤ÈºÐ½Ð²þ³×¤òÀâÌÀ¤·¤¿¤¬¡¢ÂçÅýÎΤδðËÜÊý¿Ë¤È¤ÏÌ·½â¤Î¤Ê¤¤¤â¤Î¤À¤È»×¤¦¡×¤ÈÏä·¤¿¡£
 
Washington Post
Opinion Writer The ¡Æfiscal cliff¡Ç deal we need
 
By Robert J. Samuelson, Nov 19, 2012 12:36 AM EST

The first reason to avoid going over the ¡Èfiscal cliff¡É is economic.
The $500 billion of tax increases and spending cuts scheduled for early
2013 would probably cause a new recession. The Congressional Budget
Office predicts the unemployment rate, now 7.9 percent, would go to
9.1 percent by year-end 2013. It might be worse. David Stockton of
the Peterson Institute — until recently a top Federal Reserve economist
— argues that another recession, when the economy hasn¡Çt recovered
from the last one, would profoundly damage the nation¡Çs psyche.
Fearful consumers and businesses would curb spending. Stubbornly
high unemployment might persist for years.
 
 
³¨82¡¡¡¡¡¡7ºÐ¡¡ÆÀ°Õ¤Îưʪ¡¢Ä»
イメージ 1
 
¥¯¥é¥¯¥é
¥¯¥é¥¯¥é
ÃËÀ­ / AB·¿
¿Íµ¤ÅÙ
Yahoo!¥Ö¥í¥°¥Ø¥ë¥× - ¥Ö¥í¥°¿Íµ¤Å٤ˤĤ¤¤Æ
¸¡º÷ ¸¡º÷
Æü
·î
²Ð
¿å
ÌÚ
¶â
ÅÚ
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

¥Ö¥í¥°¥Ð¥Ê¡¼

¤è¤·¤â¤È¥Ö¥í¥°¥é¥ó¥­¥ó¥°

¤â¤Ã¤È¸«¤ë
ËÜʸ¤Ï¤³¤³¤Þ¤Ç¤Ç¤¹¤³¤Î¥Ú¡¼¥¸¤ÎÀèÆ¬¤Ø

[PR]¤ªÆÀ¾ðÊó

¤Õ¤ë¤µ¤ÈǼÀÇ¥µ¥¤¥È¡Ø¤µ¤È¤Õ¤ë¡Ù
¼Â¼Á2000±ß¤ÇÆÃ»ºÉʤ¬¤ª¼ê¸µ¤Ë
11¡¿30¤Þ¤Ç¥­¥ã¥ó¥Ú¡¼¥ó¼Â»ÜÃæ¡ª

¤½¤Î¾¤Î¥­¥ã¥ó¥Ú¡¼¥ó

¤ß¤ó¤Ê¤Î¹¹¿·µ­»ö