|
Deadline for Japanese ISIS hostages fast approaching
TOKYO -- The deadline for paying $200 million ransom to secure the release of two Japanese hostages held by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) was fast approaching early Friday with no signs of a breakthrough.
Hours before the cutoff time after which the militants threatened to kill her son, the mother of hostage Kenji Goto pleaded for his freedom. Looking frail as she quietly wept, Junko Ishido begged his captors to save Goto's life. "To the people of the Islamic State, Kenji is not your enemy," she said in a tearful appearance in Tokyo. "Please let him go." She said her son had left behind a two-week-old baby to try to save friend and fellow hostage Haruna Yukawa, the founder of a private security company who was captured last year.
"My son felt he had to do everything in his power to try to rescue a friend. That was very important to him," Ishido said, apologizing repeatedly for "all the trouble my son has caused." The militants threatened in a video message Tuesday to kill the hostages within 72 hours unless they received $200 million. Based on the video's release time, that deadline would expire sometime Friday. "Ever since before he learned to walk, my son has been kind to all of the children he knew," said Ishido, adding that she was "confused by my sorrow." The status of efforts to free the two men was unclear. Japan's national broadcaster NHK reported that it had received a message from Islamic State "public relations" saying that a statement would be released sometime soon. Government spokesman Yoshihide Suga said Thursday that Japan was trying all possible channels to reach those holding the hostages and that Japan had not received any message from ISIS since the release of the video.
Japan has been scrambling for a way to secure the release of the two men. Tokyo lacks strong diplomatic connections in the Middle East, and Japanese diplomats left Syria as the civil war there escalated, adding to the difficulty of contacting the group holding the hostages. Two Japanese who said they have contacts with an ISIS leader offered Thursday to try to negotiate, but it was unclear if the Japanese government was receptive to the idea. Ko Nakata, an expert on Islamic law and former professor at Kyoto's Doshisha University, and journalist Kousuke Tsuneoka are both converts to Islam. Appearing at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan, Nakata, who is also a former Islamic specialist at the Japanese Embassy in Saudi Arabia, read a message in Japanese and Arabic. "Seventy-two hours is just too short. Please wait just a bit longer, and do not try to take action immediately," he said, addressing the militants. "If there is room to talk, I'm ready to go and negotiate." Nakata proposed offering $200 million in humanitarian aid to refugees and residents of areas controlled by ISIS, through the Red Crescent Society.
"The Red Crescent Society is operating under ISIS control. Why don't we seek Turkey's mediation and give the money for the people affected by the conflicts in Iraq and Syria? I believe this could be a rational, acceptable option," he said. A freelance journalist, Tsuneoka was released after being held hostage in Afghanistan in 2010. Tsuneoka and Nakata visited Syria in September in an unsuccessful attempt to gain Yukawa's release. Goto was seized sometime after late October when he entered the area, reportedly while trying to help Yukawa. In his last communication with ISIS several months ago, Tsuneoka said they had promised not to kill Yukawa or demand ransom. "It's a desperate situation," Tsuneoka said. "I don't recall a hostage who survived after appearing on the video." It is unclear if the two would be allowed to go to Syria, since they have been questioned by Japan's security police on suspicion of trying to help a Japanese college student visit Syria to fight with ISIS.
Tsuneoka said they would contact the militants only with a go-ahead by the Foreign Ministry, and could possibly ask ISIS representatives to meet with them in Turkey. Nakata and Tsuneoka said their contact was the current ISIS spokesman, whom they identified as Omar Ghrabah. But they said police surveillance and harassment had prevented any communication with him since early October. Suga refused to comment directly on their offer, though he said Tokyo was "prepared to consider all possible ways to save the two hostages." Japanese officials have also not directly said whether they are considering paying any ransom, though Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said their lives were the top priority. Abe's options are limited. Japan's military operates only in a self-defense capacity a home so any rescue attempt would require help from an ally like the United States. Japanese media have reported that Goto's wife received an email in December asking for more than 2 billion yen ($17 million) in ransom, but it did not contain a threaten to kill Goto. Abe has pledged $200 million in aid for refugees displaced by the fighting in Syria. In its ransom video, ISIS accused Abe of providing money to kill Muslim women and children and destroy homes, a charge the Japanese government rejects. Abe aims to raise Japan's global profile and shift to more pro-active diplomatic and security roles, but this crisis could make the public more wary of greater involvement in the Middle East and other global crises. In 2004, militants captured a Japanese backpacker, demanding that Japan pull its troops out of humanitarian projects in southern Iraq. The government refused, and the backpacker was found beheaded. |
宗教哲学
[ リスト | 詳細 ]
|
This is a rush transcript from "Hannity," January 7, 2015. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated. .
SEAN HANNITY, HOST: At least 12 people are dead following a horrific terror attack against a satirical newspaper in Paris, France. Now, the attack, carried out by heavily armed hooded gunmen, appears to have been in reaction to that paper's depiction of the Muslim Prophet Mohammed. And radical London imam, a guy by the name of Imam Choudary, Anjem Choudary, took to Twitter after the slaughter, tweeting, quote, "Freedom of expression does not extend to insulting the prophets of Allah, whatever your views on the events in Paris today are. #Parisshooting." He also tweeted, ''Muslims love the messenger Mohammed more than their parents, children, even themselves. Why don't people understand?''
ANJEM CHOUDARY, LONDON IMAM: No, what I'm saying is that these things need to be put into context. We're talking about a French government who have banned the (INAUDIBLE) they refuse Muslims to build mosques now in Paris. They are engaged in an occupation of Muslim land and even killing Muslims now in Syria and Iraq. And on top of that-- they insult the profit (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: You're making-- you're justifying this. They went in and slaughtered a newspaper, a satirical newspaper that makes fun of the pope and makes fun of Catholics and all religions and politicians and everybody. But you do have in France many no-go zones, where non-Muslims are not allowed to go, and police and fire departments are not allowed to go. And you do have sharia courts in those areas. So your characterization is not exactly accurate about the treatment of Muslims in France.
CHOUDARY: Well, I think that the political landscape in Europe has, in fact, shifted. As you know, many right-wing organizations are now to-- are now allowed to espouse their own anti-Islamic, you know, ideas very openly. And in fact, we could have a government in places like France which are very anti-Islam and anti-Muslims. HANNITY: Yeah. So what you're basically saying-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: So what you're basically saying is freedom of expression does not extend to insulting the prophets of Allah, whatever your views on what happened in Paris. So you're saying you do not believe in freedom of speech. You don't believe in freedom of religion. You don't believe in freedom of expression. You believe in Islamic fascism, that people must abide by your laws!
CHOUDARY: Actually, as a Muslim, we believe sovereignty and supremacy belongs to God. And therefore, we believe in submitting to the commands of God-- HANNITY: Well, you're demanding-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: But you're not-- no, you're demanding everybody else submit to what you believe--
CHOUDARY: No. No, what we say-- HANNITY: --and it should be-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: Well, that's what you said. You said freedom of expression-- CHOUDARY: What we say is that-- HANNITY: Go ahead. CHOUDARY: Well, what we say is that freedom of expression has a responsibility by those people who espouse it in the West, in particular non-Muslims. But as you know, it is, you know, changed. It is curtailed for things like incitement of hatred. And as you know, you have laws which allow, you know, the curtailment of freedom of expression for your own national security. HANNITY: So you're saying that-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: I get what you're saying. You're saying anything offensive about the Prophet Mohammed should be illegal, and you believe that should be worldwide. Every country should adopt that law.
CHOUDARY: Well, you know, you need to understand that in Islam, this carries capital punishment. We saw before with Theo Van Gogh-- HANNITY: Right. CHOUDARY: --and Salman Rushdie-- HANNITY: But you're not answering. You're saying that every country-- (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: --people should be aware about this already. HANNITY: But every country should adopt that, and it's convert or die. It's either you agree with us or we will go into your newspaper-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: --and we will slaughter you. We will put a fatwa out on you. CHOUDARY: No. What we're saying-- what we're saying is that, you know, a quarter of the world's population revere the messenger Mohammed (INAUDIBLE) and you know, for them, they'll prefer to die themselves than to allow anyone to insult the prophet. Now, people in the West should understand that. We live in a very unstable and insecure world today, which you can see very well now in Paris-- HANNITY: OK-- CHOUDARY: --what the consequences of insulting the prophet are -- HANNITY: Let me ask you a question-- (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: And all we're saying is that the sensibilities and the emotions of Muslims must be taken into consideration in the context in which we live today. HANNITY: Let me-- let me ask you quick questions and get answers. And I'm really holding my temper down because you really anger me and I know you anger a lot of our audience. But I think this is important. You want worldwide a law to be in every country that you cannot criticize the prophet. Is that accurate? CHOUDARY: Well, we want the sharia, and the sharia says that-- HANNITY: In every country. CHOUDARY: --this is completely prohibited. HANNITY: OK. And to you-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: And to you, this-- I want short answers. To you, this is the true Islam. This is-- this is Islam. CHOUDARY: Well, of course. HANNITY: No criticizing the prophet. CHOUDARY: Of course. HANNITY: OK. And those that are apostates that once were Muslim but convert to, say, Christianity, you believe that those people should die, right? CHOUDARY: Well, I believe that-- (CROSSTALK)
CHOUDARY: --proven in a sharia court they are found guilty of apostating (ph), then there does-- this-- there does-- HANNITY: OK, so apostates should-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: The penalty for apostacism is death, in your view. You're agreeing. CHOUDARY: This is correct, yes. HANNITY: And infidels, non-Muslims, they should die, as well, right? They-- they must abide-- CHOUDARY: No, nobody said that. Nobody said that. HANNITY: But the Quran says-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: --take neither Christians nor Jews for your friends. The Quran says that. CHOUDARY: The Christians and Jews can live side by side with the Muslims, as they did in the heart of Europe for over 800 years in Andalusia. HANNITY: OK-- (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: --need to be killed. HANNITY: What about jihad against infidels? And holy war? CHOUDARY: Well, jihad is either to defend the life and property of Muslims, which is called jihad (INAUDIBLE) defensive jihad, or it is to remove the obstacles in the way-- HANNITY: Next question-- CHOUDARY: --of (INAUDIBLE) the sharia, outside of the frontiers of the Islamic state. HANNITY: Let's talk about rights of women under sharia, which you said you want worldwide. Should every woman-- should they be mandated worldwide that they must cover themselves? CHOUDARY: Well, we believe that either you abide by the criteria which is set out by God-- HANNITY: So the answer is yes. CHOUDARY: --of how much you should cover your own body, or you know, that people will decide for themselves-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: We're running out of time. (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: I want people to know what you think true Islam is. CHOUDARY: --should be determined by divine law. HANNITY: OK, short answers. (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: These are yes or no questions. So women should cover, yes, right? CHOUDARY: Of course. HANNITY: OK. All women-- (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: Men and women should cover. HANNITY: All right, no bikinis for anybody. No bikinis for anybody-- CHOUDARY: This is what we believe. HANNITY: OK, I got it. All right. Adultery-- CHOUDARY: You know, what they do in their home is one thing, but not in the public arena. HANNITY: Not in the public. Got it. Adulterers, women that commit adultery, you're OK with them being stoned to death? CHOUDARY: Men and women who commit adultery for which there is sufficient evidence-- for example, four eyewitnesses who saw the actual-- HANNITY: But that's only for-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: That's only for men. That's only for women. CHOUDARY: --be tried in a court-- no, it's for both men and women. HANNITY: So adultery-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: The penalty for adultery should be death. CHOUDARY: For both men and the women who-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: And what about gays and lesbians? Should they be killed, as well? CHOUDARY: Well, if someone likes someone of the same gender, it's one thing. But if they are committing the-- you know, the-- the act of sodomy- - HANNITY: If they're having sex. CHOUDARY: --and are witnesses-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: They should die. OK-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: And you're OK with comics and satirists and critics of Islam-- for example, if somebody questions the age of Mohammed's wife, that they should be, what-- the penalty for them should be death, as well? CHOUDARY: No, I mean, you can ask about the age of the wives of the prophet. You can criticize Islam in that you can have a debate and discussion. But there's a difference between insulting the honor of the messenger Mohammed-- (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: For example what this particular magazine did was portray him naked. HANNITY: And you-- CHOUDARY: And they-- they-- they-- you know, they-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: And that's too bad. And you know what? You're going to have to get over it. There was a-- I'm a Catholic, and there was a picture-- an artist in the Brooklyn museum, elephant dung on the Virgin Mary. I didn't like it, but I didn't go in and shoot the people in the museum. CHOUDARY: Yes, but that's your way of life, so-- HANNITY: Hang on! (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: But you're saying this is-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: I'm running out of time. You're saying this is true Islam, and you're also-- on the other hand, you say this is a peaceful religion. How is it peaceful if you believe-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: --all these people that you disagree with? CHOUDARY: No, Islam does not mean peace, Sean, it means submission, submission to the commands of God. HANNITY: OK, so you want worldwide-- (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: --peacefully with me, then we can live peacefully together. We can live peacefully together, but-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: If we submit to your will and we're your slave, then yeah-- (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: --as your own CIA admit, that's not peace-- HANNITY: So you want Islamofascism! CHOUDARY: When you talk about Muslims, obviously, they will react (INAUDIBLE) HANNITY: Yeah, so you basically want Islamofascism. You want to control everybody. Everybody-- CHOUDARY: No, we want sharia. (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: I'm not disagreeing with you. I just want to make sure. You don't call it that, but ostensibly, when you take away everybody's freedom of choice and demand that they think like you do and practice the way you do, you have taken away all freedom of thought. All right, last question-- CHOUDARY: But we're not calling for that, though, are we, Sean. I mean, you can become, you know, a Muslim if you wish. You can remain a Christian or a Jew. You can live under the sharia. This is what we're saying. We're talking about-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: --convert of die. CHOUDARY: --the occupation of Muslim land. HANNITY: Convert or die, basically. CHOUDARY: What? HANNITY: Convert or-- CHOUDARY: No. No. They can convert to Islam or they can live (INAUDIBLE) which is the non-Muslim living under the sharia, and-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: --under sharia, if you have to follow your laws or die. (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: The law of the land in America-- HANNITY: Listen-- CHOUDARY: You want people to abide by the law in America. So under the sharia, you will abide by sharia law. HANNITY: All right. Anjem Choudary, I still think you're an evil SOB. But I really wanted to-- I really want people to hear you because I don't think-- CHOUDARY: I think you should look in the mirror, Sean. HANNITY: I don't-- I don't-- I don't think-- you think I'm evil, I think you're evil. I don't want to impose my will and my values, and I don't want to kill people that I disagree with-- CHOUDARY: Well, you have already. You're-- (CROSSTALK) HANNITY: No, I haven't killed anybody. CHOUDARY: --said to me. HANNITY: But I will say this-- (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: You don't want to listen. You don't want to listen to-- HANNITY: No, I'm not going to listen to you! I'm not going to practice your religion. And I don't agree with your views on religion. And I will practice my faith in my free way. And I'll also be free to criticize you, even though you don't like it. (CROSSTALK) CHOUDARY: --and the way the CIA admit they torture people. HANNITY: Yeah, well-- CHOUDARY: What's the justification for that, by the way, Sean? HANNITY: They deserved it. Three people got waterboarded. And you know what? They all deserved it. CHOUDARY: No, no, no! HANNITY: I got to go. Thank you for being with us. CHOUDARY: There's a document-- HANNITY: Appreciate it. |
|
■歴史家の視角
人びとは、なぜ歴史を研究するのか。 この問いを個人に即して言えば、本「研究」の筆者は何故、子供の時分から歴史を学び、今完結しようとしているこの本に三十年もの歳月を費やしたのか。 歴史家は天性のものなのか、それとも造られるものなのか。 歴史家はいずれも自己の経験に基付いてものを言うであろうから、この問いに対してそれぞれ独自の答えを持っているであろう。 「意見は十人十色」Quot homines, tot sententiae(テレンティウス「フォルミオ」第二幕第四場十四行)であって、各人が自分の意見を述べなければならない。 本「研究」の筆者個人の答えは、歴史家は、幸いに人生に一つの目標をもち得た他の人間と同じく、「神を追い求め、神を見いだすように」(「使徒行伝」第十七章第二七節)という神の呼びかけのうちに自己の使命を見出したのである、というのであった。 もしこの個人的な答えが読者に好意をもって迎えられるならば、それはまたおそらく、われわれが最初に掲げた問いのなかに暗に含まれているもう一つの問いに答える助けになるであろう。 われわれはいきなり、われわれは何故歴史を研究するのか、という問いから始めたが、まず歴史ということによって何を意味するか、ということを問うべきであったのである。やはり個人的経験から自分一個の意見を述べるにすぎないが、筆者は、歴史とは、誠実に神を追い求める魂の活動に於いて自己を顕示する神の姿ーーそれはおぼろげで、部分的なものではあるが、その限りに於いて紛れもなく真実の神の姿ーーを見ることであると答えたい。「神を見た者はまだひとりもいない(「ヨハネによる福音書」)」し、われわれの見るどんなに明瞭な姿も神の「断片的な光」にほかならないからにして、職業の数だけ異なった視角があり、歴史家の視角は、異なった才能と異なった経験をもつ魂が、「想像を絶して巨大なみわざ(ゲーテ「ファウスト」)」の異なった断片を通して見られる神の異なった部分的な姿を捉える、多くの異なった視角の一つにすぎない。歴史家の視角のほかに、天文学者の視角、物理学者の視角、数学者の視角、詩人の視角、神秘家の視角、預言者の視角、聖職者の視角、行政官の視角、法律家の視角、軍人の視角、船員の視角、漁夫の視角、猟師の視角、羊飼いの視角、農夫の視角、職人の視角、技術者の視角、医師の視角がある。このように列挙してゆけば何ページにも及ぶであろう。人間の職業は数多く、種々さまざまであり、そのおのおのが与える神の姿は狭く微かなものであるからである。歴史家の視角は、これら無数の視角のうちの一つにすぎないが、それは他の視角と同じように、人類の漸次的な実在認識に対して独自の貢献をする。 歴史の貢献は、人間の経験では六つの次元を示す枠のなかで進行する、神の創造活動のヴィジョンを与えることである。歴史的視角は、物理的宇宙が ”時間・空間” の四次元の枠のなかで遠心的に動き、地上の生命が "生命・時間・空間" の五次元の枠のなかで進化的に動き、さらに精神を賦与されて第六の次元に高められた人間の魂が、その精神的自由を宿命的に行使して、創造者に向かって、或いは創造者から離れて動いてゆくありさまを示す。 アーノルド・トインビー著「歴史の研究」最終巻「歴史家の霊感」より |
|
Hallelujah (Aleluya)
Written by George Friedrich Haandel Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah For the lord God omnipotent reigneth Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah For the lord God omnipotent reigneth Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah For the lord God omnipotent reigneth Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah (For the lord God omnipotent reigneth) Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah For the lord God omnipotent reigneth (Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah) Hallelujah The kingdom of this world; is become the kingdom of our Lord, and of His Christ and of His Christ And He shall reign for ever and ever And he shall reign forever and ever And he shall reign forever and ever And he shall reign forever and ever King of kings forever and ever hallelujah hallelujah and lord of lords forever and ever hallelujah hallelujah King of kings forever and ever hallelujah hallelujah and lord of lords forever and ever hallelujah hallelujah King of kings forever and ever hallelujah hallelujah and lord of lords King of kings and lord of lords And he shall reign And he shall reign And he shall reign He shall reign And he shall reign forever and ever King of kings forever and ever and lord of lords hallelujah hallelujah And he shall reign forever and ever King of kings and lord of lords King of kings and lord of lords And he shall reign forever and ever Forever and ever and ever and ever (King of kings and lord of lords) Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah Hallelujah |
|
"Aha! The reasoning of our great genius turned out in the long run to have the greater validity! No, let us be serious, Professore! Answer me this, answer me in the presence of these two young listeners: Do you believe in truth, in objective, scientific truth, to strive after the attainment of which is the highest law of all morality, and whose triuphs over authority form the most glorious page in the history of the human spirit?"
なんの、なんの、私たちの偉大な不幸なガリレイの論証は、より以上に真理であったことが証明されたのです。
いや、私たちは真面目に話そうではありませんか、教授。
熱心に聴いておられる若い二人のまえで答えていただきましょう、あなたは真理を信じるのですか、客観的真理、科学的真理を?
その真理を追求することがあらゆる道徳の最高目的であり、また、権威にたいしてその真理を勝たせることが人間精神のかがやかしい歴史を意味するという真理を?
Hans Castorp and Joachim—the first faster than the second—turned their heads from Settembrini to Naphta.
ハンスカストルプとヨアヒムとは、ゼテムブリニからナフタへ目を移したが、前者は後者よりも移しようが速かった。
Naphta replied: "There can be no such triumphs as those you speak of; for the authority is man himself—his interests, his worth, his salvation—and thus between it and truth no conflict is possible. They coincide."
ナフタは答えた。「あなたのいわれるような勝利は不可能です。 なぜなら、権威は人間自身であって、人間の利害、人間の尊厳性、人間の救済が権威なんですから。そして、権威と真理とのあいだに衝突などがありうるはずはありません。
二つは一致します。」
"Then truth, according to you—"
「すると真理とは・・・・・・」
"Whatever profits man, that is the truth. In him all nature is comprehended, in all nature only he is created, and all nature only for him. He is the measure of all things, and his welfare is the sole and single criterion of truth. Any theoretic science which is without practical application to man’s salvation is as such without significance, we are commanded to reject it.
「人間のためになるものが真理です。 自然は人間のなかに要約されています。
あらゆる自然のなかで人間のみが創造され、ほかの自然はすべて人間のためにつくられたものです。
人間が万物の尺度であって、人間の救済こそ真理の標識です。
人間の救済という理念に実際的な関連を持たない理論的認識は、真理としての価値をすこしもみとめられないし、認容しません。
Throughout the Christian centuries it was accepted fact that the natural sciences afforded man no edification. Lactantius, who was chosen by Constantine the Great as tutor to his son, put the position very clearly when he asked in so many words what heavenly bliss he could attain by knowing the sources of the Nile, or the twaddle of the physicists anent the heavenly bodies. Answer him if you can! キリスト教的世紀のすべては、自然科学が人間にとって無価値であるという点で完全に一致した考えを持っていました。
コンスタンティノス大帝が王子の教師にえらんだラクタンティウスも、率直にいっているではありませんか、ナイル河の水源地がどこにあるかを知っても、また、物理学者の天界についてのご託宣を知っても、それが人間の救済にどんな益があろうかと。
それをあなたからラクタンティウスに教えてやってください
Why have we given the Platonic philosophy the preference over every other, if not because it has to do with knowledge of God, and not knowledge of nature? Let me assure you that mankind is about to find its way back to this point of view. プラトン哲学がほかのすべての哲学よりも尊重されるのは、その哲学が自然認識を問題とせずに、神の認識を問題にしているからです。
私は断言できますが、人類は私が今述べたような見解に立ち戻ろうとしています。
Mankind will soon perceive that it is not the task of true science to run after godless understanding; but to reject utterly all that is harmful, yes, even all that ideally speaking is without significance, in favour of instinct, measure, choice.
人類はまもなく、真の科学の任務は救いのない認識を追いまわすことではなくて、有害なもの、もしくは、単に観念的に価値のないものを原則的に排除し、本能、節度、選択を教えることにあるのだということを理解するようになるでしょう。
|



