今 言論・表現の自由があぶない!

弾圧と戦争が手をつないでやってきた! 即時閣議決定すべきは個人通報制度批准!! ピース9 国連経済社会理事会正式協議資格NGO

人種差別撤廃条約

[ リスト | 詳細 ]

記事検索
検索

全8ページ

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

[ 次のページ ]


  《日刊ゲンダイ:二極化・格差社会の真相》
 ◆ 安倍政権がやりたいのはただひとつ「差別」ではないのか
斎藤貴男 ジャーナリスト

 いよいよ末期症状である。日本は差別を外交に優先し、その報いで手痛いしっぺ返しを食らった。
 韓国にGSOMIA(軍事情報包括保護協定)を一方的に破棄された。大変なことである……はずなのだ。北朝鮮の軍事情報が、彼らを最もよく知る国から直接には入ってこなくなるのだから。
 もともと韓国では日本とのGSOMIAに反対の世論が強い。一度は署名寸前で延期され、2016年に朴槿恵前大統領が締結を強行した経緯もある。当時は野党だった文在寅政権が今回の措置に踏み切る流れは、自然の成り行きでもあった。

 最近の対立の契機は、昨秋の韓国最高裁判決だった。戦時中の徴用工をめぐる裁判で、新日鉄住金(現日本製鉄)と三菱重工業が相次いで賠償を命じられた。


 1965年の「日韓請求権協定」個人の請求権まで消滅させたとは言えず、91年8月27日の参院予算委員会でも外務省の柳井俊二条約局長(後に外務事務次官)がそう答弁しているのに、日本政府は「解決済みだ」の一点張り。

 騒動を商取引の領域にまで拡大したやり方は、“どっちもどっち”ではあった。見ていて目を覆いたくなるのは、この問題を語る時の政権首脳らの面相が、どうにも卑しくてならないことだ。

 頭ごなしに相手の責任だけをあげつらう。ことさらに冷笑してみせ、かと思えば恫喝じみた態度を取る

 「よりよい解決策を」と切り出した駐日大使を「無礼だ!」と怒鳴りつけた7月の河野太郎外相など、弱いくせにほえたがるチンピラ以外の何物でもなかった。
 こんなものは外交でも何でもない。それをまたマスコミ、特にテレビのワイドショーがはやし立てる。過去の過ちなど何もなかったと開き直る、いわゆる“歴史戦”の毒が、官民一体のコラボで日本中に回ってしまった。

 安倍政権がやりたいのはただひとつ、「差別」ではないのか。
 さすがは“明治150年”。朝鮮半島や中国の人々を蔑むことイコール愛国心とされ、帝国主義への原動力とした近代史を、彼らはまたしても繰り返そうとして、肝心の情報ルートを絶たれてしまうというド醜態。

 困った政府やマスコミが、救いの手を米国に求めているのも恥ずかしく、おぞましい。ポンペオ国務長官が「失望した」と言ったの、ワシントン・ポスト紙が「最大の勝者は北朝鮮」と書いたのと、こんな時まで植民地根性丸出しとは。
 安倍政権における“国家安全保障”とは、どこまでも「戦争ごっこ」であるらしい。


 ※斎藤貴男 ジャーナリスト
1958年生まれ。早大卒。イギリス・バーミンガム大学で修士号(国際学MA)取得。日本工業新聞、プレジデント、週刊文春の記者などを経てフリーに。「戦争経済大国」(河出書房新社)、「日本が壊れていく」(ちくま新書)、「『明治礼賛』の正体」(岩波ブックレット)など著書多数。

『日刊ゲンダイ』(2019/08/28)
https://www.nikkan-gendai.com/articles/view/news/260895



アメリカ合衆国は、国連設立時の原加盟国(51カ国)です。

国連が1945年6月26日にサンフランシスコで作成した国連憲章の第9章第55条C項には、人種、性、言語または宗教による差別のないすべての者のための人権及び基本的自由の普遍的な尊重及び遵守することが定められてます。

さらに、第56条には、すべての加盟国は、第55条に掲げる目的を達成するために、この機構と協力して、共同及び個別の行動をとることを誓約することとなっています。

そして、アメリカ合衆国は1992年6月2日、世界人権宣言を敷衍化し法律化した国際人権規約(経済的、社会的及び文化的権利に関する国際規約(社会権規約)・市民的及び政治的権利に関する国際規約(自由権規約))のうち、自由権規約を批准しています。

トランプ大統領による一連の人種差別発言は、国連憲章違反であるとともに、自由権規約第20条第2項に明確に違反しています。





  日本の外務省国内広報課が20年前1998年12月に作成したパンフレット 「世界人権宣言と国際人権規約ー世界人権宣言50周年に当たってー」の11ページ

(3) 戦争宣伝の禁止及び国民的、人種的又は宗教的憎悪の唱道の禁止 

第二十条は、「戦争のためのいかなる宣伝も、法律で禁止する」「差別、敵意又は暴力の煽勤となる国民的、人種的又は宗教的憎悪の唱道は、法律で禁止する」と規定しています。 

「戦争宣伝の禁止」について、わが国にはこれを実施するための国内法はありません。
そもそも表現の自由がこの規定により不当に害されてはならないことは当然であり、実際に立法するかどうかは表現の自由を考慮した各締約国の裁量に委ねられているとも考えられます。
ひるがえって、わが国は憲法第九条で戦争を放棄しており、「戦争宣伝」という抽象的なものを法律で罰する必要はありません。

 「国民的、人種的又は宗教的憎悪の唱道の禁止」については、わが国では刑法を始め教育、労働その他各般の分野で差別、敵意、暴力の排除に資する立法措置がとられています。
今後こうした現行法制でも規制し得ない行為により具体的な弊害が生じた場合には、表現の自由を確保するという要請をも十分に考慮して立法措置が検討されることとなりましょう。


 
   弁護士懲戒請求で「差別」を認定したのは当然。
  しかし、弁護士が理由のない懲戒請求を申し立てられた事件であるにもかかわらず、高裁が33万円の支払いを命じた一審東京地裁判決を変更し、賠償額を11万円に減額したのは不当です。
  

ー・−・−・−・−・−・−・ー・−・−・−・−・−・−・ー・−・−・−・−・−

 5/14(火) 19:21配信 共同通信

 弁護士懲戒請求で「差別」認定 在日コリアン、高裁で賠償減額

 在日コリアンの金竜介弁護士(東京弁護士会)が、理由のない懲戒請求を申し立てられたとして、東京都の男性に55万円の損害賠償を求めた訴訟の控訴審判決で、東京高裁は14日、男性の行為を差別と認定した。一方、33万円の支払いを命じた一審東京地裁判決を変更し、賠償額を11万円に減額した。

 判決で高裁の萩原秀紀裁判長は、在日コリアンであるために懲戒請求の対象になったと指摘した上で「民族的出身に対する差別意識で、合理性が認められない」と判断した。金弁護士らによると、同種訴訟の判決で「差別」と明言したのは初めて。

4/11(木) 16:29配信 共同通信

「在日一掃」投稿の前所長を処分 年金機構、停職2カ月

 日本年金機構の世田谷年金事務所の葛西幸久前所長がツイッターに人種差別的な投稿を繰り返していた問題で、同機構は11日、本部人事部付としていた葛西氏を同日付で停職2カ月の処分にしたと発表した。調査の結果、所長の立場を悪用した個人情報の不正利用や、不適切な事務処理は確認できなかったとしている。

 機構によると、葛西氏は昨年秋ごろからツイッターに「在日一掃、新規入国拒否」など、韓国人への差別的投稿を繰り返していた。勤務時間中にも投稿しており、「好意的な反応があり、エスカレートしてしまった」と釈明しているという。

CERD/C/JPN/CO/10-11 23~49

 23. The Committee is concerned by the reported continuation of ethnic or ethno-religious profiling and surveillance of Muslims of foreign origin by law enforcement officials (art. 5). 

24. Bearing in mind its general recommendation No. 31 (2005) on the prevention of racial discrimination in the administration and functioning of the criminal justice system, the Committee recommends that the State party put an end to ethnic or ethnoreligious profiling and surveillance of Muslims of foreign origin by the police and undertake thorough and impartial investigations into all allegations of profiling and mass surveillance, holding those responsible accountable and providing effective remedies, including guarantees of non-repetition. Intersecting forms of discrimination and violence against women

 25. The Committee remains concerned at reports of intersecting forms of discrimination against foreign, indigenous and minority women based on their national origin, ethnicity and gender and that they face various specific obstacles in overcoming poverty, in access to education, health care and employment. They often suffer of anxiety and psychological distress because of the stigma and hate speech against them and their families. The Committee is further concerned at the continued reports of violence against them and at the lack of information on measures taken to address violence against these women, including under the Fourth Basic Plan for Gender Equality (2015) as well as by the lack of data on investigations, prosecutions, and convictions of perpetrators of such violence. The Committee also reiterates its previous concern (CERD/C/JPN/CO/7-9, para.17) that Article 22-4 of the Immigration Control Act may prevent foreign women who are victims of domestic violence by their husbands from leaving abusive relationships and from seeking assistance, for fear of having their residency revoked. 


26. Recalling its general recommendation No. 25 (2000) on the gender-related dimensions of racial discrimination and No. 30 (2004) on discrimination against noncitizens, the Committee recommends that:


(a) The State party ensure dedicated attention to women suffering of intersecting forms of discrimination and collect relevant statistics to better understand and address their specific challenges;
 (b) Foreign, indigenous and minority women have the right and opportunity to participate in decision-making processes, especially when it affects their own situation; 
(c) The State party take immediate measures to prevent violence against foreign, minority and indigenous women, including through the proper registration, investigation, prosecution and conviction of perpetrators of such violence. The Committee requests information in its next periodic report on specific measure under the Fourth Basic Plan for Gender Equality (2015) to prevent violence against foreign, minority and indigenous women as well as data on numbers of reported crimes of violence against women, disaggregated by ethnicity of victims, and numbers of investigations, prosecutions and convictions. The State party should also amend its legislation to ensure that it does not have the effect of forcing foreign women to remain in abusive relationships for fear of loss of residency status or deportation. “Comfort Women”

 27. While noting information provided by the State party on the efforts to resolve the issue of “comfort women,” including the recent agreement with the Republic of Korea in 2015, the Committee is concerned at reports that these efforts do not take a fully victim-centred approach, that the surviving “comfort women” were not adequately consulted and that this solution did not provide unequivocal responsibility for the human rights violations committed against these women by the military before and during WWII. The Committee is also concerned by statements of some public officials minimizing the responsibility of the Government in respect to “comfort women” and their potential negative impact on survivors. 

28. The Committee recommends that the State party ensure a lasting solution to the issue of “comfort women” with a victim-centred approach, inclusive of “comfort women” of all nationalities, accepting responsibility for its role in the violation of the human rights of these women. The Committee requests detailed information in its next periodic report on efforts to achieve resolution of the issue of “comfort women”, including adequate measures to surviving “comfort women” and their families. Situation of Migrants 

29. The Committee is concerned at continued reports that migrants and their descendants who were born, raised and educated in the State party, continue to face entrenched societal discrimination, including restricted access to housing, education, health care, and employment opportunities (art. 5). 

30. The Committee recommends that the State party take measures to address the root causes of societal discrimination against migrants and take measures to ensure their equal access to housing, education, health care and employment opportunities, without discrimination. Technical intern training programmes for foreigners 

31. The Committee, while welcoming the enforcement of the Acton Proper Technical Intern Training and Protection of Technical Intern Trainees in November 2017 and measures taken to revise the technical intern training program, is nevertheless concerned that there is insufficient Government oversight, and lack of information on the implementation and impact of the Act. 

32. The Committee recommends that the State party ensure that the technical intern-training program is properly regulated to ensure compliance with the Act and monitored by the Government. The Committee requests information on the implementation and impact of the Act in its next periodic report.


 Situation of non-citizens 

33. The Committee is concerned that:
 (a) Non-citizens have reportedly been denied housing and employment because they are foreign nationals;
 (b) Foreign nationals and individuals with a foreign appearance have reportedly been denied entry to and services of certain privately owned facilities like hotels and restaurants which otherwise serve the public, including through the posting of signage reading “Japanese only;” 
(c) Non-citizens, in particular Koreans, continue to be excluded from the national pension scheme because of the age requirement; 
(d) The State party has not yet amended its legislation to allow non-citizens to be eligible for basic disability pensions; 
(e) Non-citizens and long term foreign residents and their descendants remain excluded from public positions that engage in the exercise of public authority or public decision-making because they do not have Japanese nationality; 
(f) Some permanent residents must obtain a permit to re-enter the country prior to departing, even if they are departing only for a day, while others do not need such a permit. 

34. Bearing in mind the Committee’s general recommendation No. 30 (2004) on discrimination against non-citizens, the Committee recommends that the State party: 
(a) Ensure access to housing and employment to non-citizens and foreign nationals without discrimination; 
(b) Create and enforce legislation against the posting of discriminatory signs and the practice of excluding public services by privately owned facilities such as hotel and restaurants to persons on the basis being a foreigner or of foreign appearance; 
(c) Ensure that non-citizens are included in the national pension scheme; 
(d) Amend legislation to allow non-citizens to be eligible for basic disability pensions; 
(e) Allow non-citizens, especially long-term foreign residents and their descendants, to also have access to public positions that engage in the exercise of public authority or public decision-making; 
(f) Eliminate the permit requirement prior to departure for some permanent residents so that they may enter and exit the country in the same manner as other permanent residents. 
(g) Consider ratifying the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless persons and the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. Refugees and asylum-seekers 

35. The Committee is concerned by the reported very low rate of asylum applications accepted in the State party (19 out of 11,000 applications). The Committee is also concerned by the detention of asylum seekers without a fixed period of time. The Committee is concerned that applicants for refugee status normally may not work or receive social welfare leaving them dependent on overcrowded government shelters or vulnerable to mistreatment and labour exploitation.

 36. Recalling its general recommendation No. 22 (1996) on refugees and displaced persons, the Committee recommends that the State party ensure that all applications for asylum status receive due consideration. The Committee recommends that the State party introduce a maximum period for immigration detention, and reiterates its previous recommendation (CERD/C/JPN/CO/7-9, para. 23), that detention of asylum seekers should only be used as a measure of last resort for the shortest possible period of time, and that efforts should be made to prioritize alternative measures to detention.


The Committee recommends that the State party allow applicants for refugee status to work six months after their applications. Trafficking in persons 

37. While noting information on efforts to address trafficking in persons, including the updated Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in Persons in 2014, the Committee is concerned at reports that minority women and girls are still subject to trafficking in the State party, in particular for sexual exploitation. The Committee is also concerned that the State party has not yet adopted specific legislation criminalizing trafficking in persons, and that the number of arrests and convictions are low. 

38. The Committee recommends that the State party step up efforts to combat trafficking in persons. The Committee recommends that the State party adopt specific legislation criminalizing trafficking in persons, and ensure that it thoroughly investigates, prosecutes and punishes perpetrators. The Committee requests information on the impact of the Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in persons on preventing trafficking in particular of minority women and girls, and provide data on numbers of investigations, prosecutions and convictions of perpetrators of trafficking, disaggregated by the nationality of the victims. D. Other recommendations Ratification of other instruments 

39. Bearing in mind the indivisibility of all human rights, the Committee urges the State party to consider ratifying those international human rights instruments that it has not yet ratified, in particular treaties with provisions that have direct relevance to communities that may be subjected to racial discrimination, including the Optional Protocol of the Convention against Torture, the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights aiming to the abolition of the death penalty, the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, the International Labour Organization Convention concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation (No. 111) (1958) and the International Labour Organization Convention concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries (1989). Follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action 

40. In the light of its general recommendation No. 33 (2009), the Committee recommends that the State party give effect to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted at the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (2001), taking into account the outcome document of the Durban Review Conference (April 2009), and that it report accordingly. International Decade for People of African Descent 

41. In the light of General Assembly resolution 68/237, the Committee requests that the State party include in its next periodic report precise information on the concrete measures adopted in the framework of the International Decade for People of African Descent, taking into account the Committee’s general recommendation No. 34 (2011) on racial discrimination against people of African descent. Consultations with civil society 

42. The Committee recommends that the State party continue consulting and increasing its dialogue with civil society organizations concerned with human rights protection, in particular those working to combat racial discrimination, in the preparation of the next periodic report and in follow-up to the present concluding observations.


Declaration under article 14 of the Convention 

43. The Committee encourages the State party to make the optional declaration provided for in article 14 of the Convention recognizing the Committee’s competence to receive and consider individual communications. Amendment to article 8 of the Convention 

44. The Committee recommends that the State party ratify the amendment to article 8 (6) of the Convention adopted on 15 January 1992 at the fourteenth meeting of States parties to the Convention and endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 47/111. Common core document 

45. The Committee encourages the State party to submit to it a common core document to replace its core document (HRI/CORE/JPN/2012), issued in 2012, in accordance with the harmonized guidelines on reporting under the international human rights treaties, in particular those on the common core document, as adopted at the fifth inter-committee meeting of the human rights treaty bodies, held in June 2006 (HRI/GEN/2/Rev.6, chap. I). In the light of General Assembly resolution 68/268, the Committee urges the State party to observe the limit of 42,400 words for such documents. Follow-up to the present concluding observations 

46. In accordance with article 9 (1) of the Convention and rule 65 of its rules of procedure, the Committee requests the State party to provide, within one year of the adoption of the present concluding observations, information on its implementation of the recommendations contained in paragraphs 10 and 32 above. Paragraphs of particular importance 

47. The Committee wishes to draw the attention of the State party to the particular importance of the recommendations contained in paragraphs 14, 22, and 34 above and requests the State party to provide detailed information in its next periodic report on the concrete measures taken to implement these. Dissemination of information 

48. The Committee recommends that the State party’s reports be made readily available to and accessible by the public at the time of their submission and that the concluding observations of the Committee with respect to those reports be similarly publicized in the official and other commonly used languages, as appropriate. Preparation of the next periodic report Preparation of the next periodic report 

49. The Committee recommends that the State party submit its combined twelfth to fourteenth periodic reports, as a single document, by 14 January 2023, taking into account the reporting guidelines adopted by the Committee during its seventy-first session (CERD/C/2007/1) and addressing all the points raised in the present concluding observations. In the light of General Assembly resolution 68/268, the Committee urges the State party to observe the limit of 21,200 words for periodic reports.



全8ページ

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

[ 次のページ ]


.
人権NGO言論・表現の自由を守る会
人権NGO言論・表現の自由を守る会
非公開 / 非公開
人気度
Yahoo!ブログヘルプ - ブログ人気度について

スマートフォンで見る

モバイル版Yahoo!ブログにアクセス!

スマートフォン版Yahoo!ブログにアクセス!

1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

よしもとブログランキング

もっと見る

[PR]お得情報

ふるさと納税サイト『さとふる』
実質2000円で特産品がお手元に
10/31まで秋の行楽キャンペーン実施中
衛生対策製品クレベリンの姉妹ブランド
クレベ&アンドハンドジェルが新登場
今だけ。お試しキャンペーン実施中!
抽選で150,000名様に当たるチャンス!
マツモトキヨシで期間中何度でも使える
100円引きクーポン<Yahoo! JAPAN>

その他のキャンペーン


プライバシー -  利用規約 -  メディアステートメント -  ガイドライン -  順守事項 -  ご意見・ご要望 -  ヘルプ・お問い合わせ

Copyright (C) 2019 Yahoo Japan Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

みんなの更新記事