ÃÏÊý¤Î»þÂ夬¤ä¤Ã¤Æ¤¯¤ë

»°°Ì°ìÂβþ³×¤½¤·¤ÆÆ»½£À©¤¬µÄÏÀ¤µ¤ì¤ëº£¡¤¤³¤ì¤«¤é¤ÎÃÏÊý¤Î̤Íè¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¹Í¤¨¤Þ¤·¤ç¤¦¡ª

¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤Îµ¤¤Ë¤Ê¤ëµ­»ö

[ ¥ê¥¹¥È | ¾ÜºÙ ]

µ­»ö¸¡º÷
¸¡º÷

Á´1¥Ú¡¼¥¸

[1]

º£Æü¡¤¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤ÎUSATODAY¤Ë¤³¤Î¤è¤¦¤Êµ­»ö¤¬

ºÜ¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£

Buffett pledges $37.1B to charity

²¯ËüĹ¼Ô¡¦Åê»ñ²È¤Î¥¦¥©¡¼¥ì¥ó¡¦¥Ð¥Õ¥§¥Ã¥È»á¡Ê£·£µ¡Ë¤¬ÆüÍËÆü¡¤

Èà¤Î£´£´£°²¯¥É¥ë¤¢¤ëBerkshire Hathaway³ô¤ÎÂçȾ¤ò

¥Ó¥ë¡¦¥²¥¤¥Ä¤Ê¤É¤¬·Ð±Ä¤¹¤ëÀ¤³¦ºÇÂç¤Î»üÁ±´ð¶â¤Ë

´óÉÕ¤¹¤ë·×²è¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤³¤È¤òȯɽ¤·¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£

£´£´£°²¯¥É¥ë¤È¤ÏÆüËܱߤǣµ¡¥£±Ãû±ß¤Ç¤¹¡£

¤³¤ì¤ÏÆü»º¼«Æ°¼Ö¤ä¥»¥Ö¥ó¥¤¥ì¥Ö¥ó¡¤¥½¥Ë¡¼¤Î»þ²ÁÁí³Û¤ËɤŨ¤·¤Þ¤¹¡£

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett said Sunday he plans to give most of his $44 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock to the world's largest charitable foundation, run by friend and Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates.

Known as the "Oracle of Omaha" for his stock-picking prowess, Buffett, 75, said he remains "in excellent health" but believes he can be most effective by giving away 84% of his stock holdings, beginning immediately. It is one of the largest-ever philanthropic gifts. He previously had pledged to leave most of his fortune to a family foundation after he died.

In letters Buffett released publicly, he "irrevocably" pledged $30.7 billion of his Berkshire Hathaway stock to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation over several years — including an initial grant of $1.54 billion — with the expectation that the value of his annual gifts will "trend higher in an irregular but eventually substantial manner." Gates, 50, recently announced plans to phase out of daily operations at Microsoft to concentrate on foundation work.

Buffett also pledged $3.1 billion in shares for a charitable foundation in the name of his late wife Susan Thompson Buffett, who died in 2004 at age 72, and whom he originally expected to manage his estate. The Buffetts' three children's charitable foundations each received additional pledges of $1.1 billion each.

¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤Îµ¤¤Ë¤Ê¤ë¥Ë¥å¡¼¥¹Vol.2

º£Æü¤ÎUSATODAY¤Ë¤³¤ó¤Ê¸«½Ð¤·¤¬½Ð¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£

People living lonelier lives

¸½Âå¤Î¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¿Í¤ÏÀΤÈÈæ¤Ù¤Æ¿Æ¤·¤¤Í§Ã£¤¬¾¯¤Ê¤¤¡ª¡©

Americans have a third fewer close friends and confidants than just two decades ago — a sign that people may be living lonelier, more isolated lives than in the past.

In 1985, the average American had three people in whom to confide matters that were important to them, says a study in today's American Sociological Review. In 2004, that number dropped to two, and one in four had no close confidants at all.

¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¿Í¤ÏÀΤÈÈæ¤Ù¤ë¤È¡¤¸ÉÆÈ¤ÊÀ¸³è¤òÁ÷¤ë¤è¤¦¤Ë¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£

£±£¹£¸£µÇ¯¤ÎÄ´ºº¤Ç¤Ï¡¤Ê¿¶ÑŪ¤Ê¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¿Í¤Ï

¥×¥é¥¤¥Ù¡¼¥È¤Ê¤³¤È¤òÏ令ëͧ¿Í¤¬£³¿Í¤¤¤¿¤½¤¦¤Ç¤¹¡£

¤È¤³¤í¤¬¡¤£²£°£°£´Ç¯¤ÎÄ´ºº¤Ç¤Ï¡¤¤½¤Î¿ô¤¬£²¿Í¤Ë¸º¾¯¤·¡¤

¤Ê¤ª¤«¤Ä£´¿Í¤Ë£±¿Í¤Ï¤½¤Î¤è¤¦¤Êͧ¿Í¤¬Á´¤¯¤¤¤Ê¤¤¤³¤È¤¬

ʬ¤«¤ê¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£



¤È¤Æ¤â°Õ³°¤Ê´¶¤¸¤¬¤·¤¿¤Î¤Ï»ä¤À¤±¤Ç¤·¤ç¤¦¤«¡©


"You usually don't see that kind of big social change in a couple of decades," says study co-author Lynn Smith-Lovin, professor of sociology at Duke University in Durham, N.C.

Close relationships are a safety net, she says. "Whether it's picking up a child or finding someone to help you out of the city in a hurricane, these are people we depend on."

Also, research has linked social isolation and loneliness to mental and physical illness.

The percentage of people who confide only in family increased from 57% to 80%, and the number who depend totally on a spouse is up from 5% to 9%, the study found. "If something happens to that spouse or partner, you may have lost your safety net," Smith-Lovin says.

The study is based on surveys of 1,531 people in 1985 and 1,467 in 2004, part of the General Social Survey by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.

Not everyone sees such a dire picture. People still have other friends, sociologist Barry Wellman of the University of Toronto says. "We have a lot of ties that aren't super strong but are still pretty important."

Why people have fewer close friends is unclear, Putnam says. "This is a mystery like Murder on the Orient Express, in which there are multiple culprits."

The chief suspects: More people live in the suburbs and spend more time at work, Putnam says, leaving less time to socialize or join groups.

Also, people have more entertainment tools such as TV, iPods and computers, so they can stay home and tune out. But some new trends, such as online social networking, may help counter the effect, he says.

¤³¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ê¸½¾Ý¤¬À¸¤¸¤¿¸¶°ø¤Ï¤ï¤«¤Ã¤Æ¤Ê¤¤¤è¤¦¤Ç¤¹¤¬¡¤

¹Í¤¨¤é¤ì¤ë¸¶°ø¤È¤·¤Æ¤Ï

­¡¿Í¡¹¤¬ÅÔ²ñ¤«¤éÎ¥¤ì¤¿¾ì½ê¤Ë½»¤à¤è¤¦¤Ë¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤³¤È

­¢ÀΤÈÈæ¤Ù¤Æ¿¦¾ì¤Ë¤¤¤ë»þ´Ö¤¬Ä¹¤¯¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤³¤È

­£TV¤äiPods¤½¤·¤Æcomputer¤Ê¤É¤Î¸ä³Ú¤¬Áý¤¨¤¿¤³¤È

­¤¥ª¥ó¥é¥¤¥ó¤Î¥½¡¼¥·¥ã¥ë¡¦¥Í¥Ã¥È¥ï¡¼¥¯¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ê

¡¡¤â¤Î¤¬À¸¤Þ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤³¤È

¤Ê¤É¤¬µó¤²¤é¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£

ÆüËÜ¤Ç¤âÆ±¤¸¤è¤¦¤Ê¸º¾¯¤¬µ¯¤­¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤³¤È¤Ï

´Ö°ã¤¤¤Ê¤¤¤Ç¤¹¤Í¡£

¤à¤·¤í¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤è¤ê¤Ò¤É¤¤¾õ¶·¤«¤â¤·¤ì¤Þ¤»¤ó¡¦¡¦¡¦¡£

º£Æü¤ÎUSA TODAY¤Ë¼¡¤Î¤è¤¦¤Êµ­»ö¤¬ºÜ¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£


¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤ÎÅÔ»ÔÊ̿͸ý¤¬È¯É½¤µ¤ì¤¿¤Î¤Ç¤¹¤¬¡¤¤½¤Î·ë²Ì¡¤

¤³¤³¿ôǯ¿Í¸ý¤¬Áý²Ã¤·¤Æ¤¤¤¿ÅÔ²ñ¤ÎÂçÅÔ»Ô¤«¤é¡¤¾®¤µ¤ÊÅÔ²ñ¤«¤éÎ¥¤ì¤¿

ÅԻԤ˿͸ý¤¬°Ü¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë
¤³¤È¤¬Ê¬¤«¤ê¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£

ÆÃ¤Ë¤½¤Î¸½¾Ý¤Ï¥µ¥ó¡¦¥Ù¥ë¥È¤È¸Æ¤Ð¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë¥«¥ê¥Õ¥©¥ë¥Ë¥¢½£¡¤¥Æ¥­¥µ¥¹½£¡¤

¥¢¥ê¥¾¥Ê½£¡¤¥Õ¥í¥ê¥À½£¤Ê¤É¤Ç¸²Ãø¤À¤½¤¦¤Ç¤¹¡£

ÆÃ¤Ë¥Æ¥­¥µ¥¹½£¤Ç¤Ï¡¤

£´¤Ä¤Î¿Í¸ý£µ£°Ëü¿Í¤òͤ¨¤ëÂçÅÔ»Ô¡ÊFort Worth, San Antonio, Austin and El Paso.¡Ë

¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¤µ¤é¤Ë¿Í¸ý¤¬Áý¤¨¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£


ÆüËܤǤÏÅÔ¿´²óµ¢¤È¸À¤ï¤ì¤ë¸½¾Ý¤¬µ¯¤­¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¤¬¡¤

¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤Ç¤ÏµÕ¤Ë·Êµ¤¤¬Îɤ«¤Ã¤¿¤³¤È¤â¤¢¤ê¡¤

°Â¤¯¹­¤¤²È¤òµá¤á¤Æ¡¤ÃÏÊýÅԻԤ˿͸ý¤¬°Ü¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤è¤¦¤Ç¤¹¡£

¡ãGrowth stretches areas of the Sun Belt¡ä

Americans' unquenchable thirst for more space and cheaper housing is creating another boom in parts of the Sun Belt and redrawing the map of the USA halfway through the decade.

The 2005 city population estimates released by the Census Bureau Wednesday show that growth is shifting from large central cities that grew rapidly years ago to smaller, outlying communities in California, Texas, Arizona and Florida.

"Smaller places are grabbing more than half the growth this decade," says William Frey, demographer at the Brookings Institution, a think tank. "It wasn't so in the 1990s."

Among the top gainers since 2000: Gilbert (near Phoenix), Miramar (Miami), Elk Grove (Sacramento), Rancho Cucamonga and Irvine (Los Angeles).

Elk Grove grew the fastest from July 1, 2004, to July 1, 2005: up 12%, to 112,338.

Texas is scoring big. San Antonio has overtaken San Diego as the No. 7 city, at 1.26 million. Four of the seven fastest-growing cities that have populations above 500,000 are in Texas: Fort Worth, San Antonio, Austin and El Paso.

Fort Worth had the biggest gain among the nation's large cities from 2004 to 2005: up 3.5% to 624,067. San Antonio was fifth at 1.7%. Both grew at faster rates than Dallas and Houston.

Á´1¥Ú¡¼¥¸

[1]


.
ÁëÊÕ¥¿¥í¡¼
ÁëÊÕ¥¿¥í¡¼
ÃËÀ­ / Èó¸ø³«
¿Íµ¤ÅÙ
Yahoo!¥Ö¥í¥°¥Ø¥ë¥× - ¥Ö¥í¥°¿Íµ¤Å٤ˤĤ¤¤Æ
Æü ·î ²Ð ¿å ÌÚ ¶â ÅÚ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

²áµî¤Îµ­»ö°ìÍ÷

[PR]¤ªÆÀ¾ðÊó

CM¤ÇÏÃÂê¤Î¤Õ¤ë¤µ¤ÈǼÀÇ¥µ¥¤¥È¤µ¤È¤Õ¤ë
ËèÆü¤ªÎéÉÊ¥é¥ó¥­¥ó¥°¹¹¿·Ã桪
2019ǯ¤Î¤Õ¤ë¤µ¤ÈǼÀǤϢã12¡¿31¤Þ¤Ç¢ä

¤½¤Î¾¤Î¥­¥ã¥ó¥Ú¡¼¥ó


¤ß¤ó¤Ê¤Î¹¹¿·µ­»ö