¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¡¦¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Î̵¸ú²ÌÏÀ¡¡2018/11/5(·î)
¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤Î»þµ¨¤Ë¤Ê¤ê¤Þ¤·¤¿¤Í¡£±Ñ¹ñÀ¯Éܤε¡Ì©¸øÊ¸½ñ¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Ï̵¸ú²Ì¤È³²°¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤ÈµºÜ¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤·¤¿¤Í¡£¤½¤ì¤Ç¤â¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Î¸ú²Ì¤ò¿®¤¸¤ëÊý¤¬²¿¤È¿¤¤¤³¤È¤«¡£¤³¤Î¸½¾Ý¤Ï¤¤¤«¤Ë¤âÆüËÜŪ¤Ç¤¹¡£
º£²ó¤Ï¡¢°å³Ø´Ø·¸¼Ô¤«¤é¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¡¢²Ê³Ø¼Ô¤«¤é¤Î¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Î̵¸ú²Ì¤ÈÇ«¤í³²°ÏÀ¤Ç¤¹¡£
¡Ê±Ñ¹ñÀ¯Éܤε¡Ì©Ê¸½ñ¡Ë
¡Øº£Åߥ說¥Á¥óÀܼ浪¤á¤Ç¤È¤¦¡Ù¡¡2017/12/4(·î)
30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts Show UK Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine HazardsT
What You May Not Know About the Flu Shot
¤¢¤Ê¤¿¤¬¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤ÆÃΤé¤Ê¤¤¤«¤â¤·¤ì¤Ê¤¤¤³¤È
BRIAN S. HOOKER, PH.D., P.E.
SCIENCE ADVISER, FOCUS FOR HEALTH | BIO
October 6, 2017
It¡Çs ¡Èflu-shot season¡É again, and the U.S.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to push vaccines on the population (pregnant women and infants included), in a futile effort to prevent cases of influenza.
CDC¡ÊÊÆ¹ñ¼ÀÉÂÂкöͽËÉ¥»¥ó¥¿¡¼¡Ë¤Ï¡Ö¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤Îȯ¾É¥·¡¼¥º¥ó¡×¤Ë°ú¤Â³¤¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤ÎͽËɤòÌÜŪ¤È¤·¤¿½¸ÃÄ¡ÊÇ¥ÉØ¤ÈÍÄ»ù¤ò´Þ¤à¡Ë¤ËÂФ¹¤ë̵Â̤ÊÅØÎϤǤ¢¤ë¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤ÎÀܼï¤ò³¤±¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
Towards the end of every season, we hear from the CDC that the efficacy of the vaccine was 62% or 58% or lower. But it is even worse.
The percentages reported by the CDC are based on the ability to match the most prevalent strains of flu infections each year with the flu ¡Èantigens¡É used in the yearly shot.
Ë襷¡¼¥º¥ó¤Î½ª¤ï¤ê¤Ë¸þ¤«¤Ã¤Æ¡¢»ä¤¿¤Á¤ÏCDC¡ÊÊÆ¹ñ¼ÀÉÂÂкöͽËÉ¥»¥ó¥¿¡¼¡Ë¤«¤é¡¢¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Î͸úÀ¤¬62¡ó¡¢¤Þ¤¿¤Ï58¡ó¡¢¤Þ¤¿¤Ï¤½¤ì°Ê²¼¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤Èʹ¤¤¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£ ¤·¤«¤·¼ÂºÝ¤Î͸úÀ¤Ï¤µ¤é¤Ë°¤¤¤Î¤Ç¤¹¡£
The percentages reported by the CDC are based on the ability to match the most prevalent strains of flu infections each year with the flu ¡Èantigens¡É used in the yearly shot. This does NOT take into account whether the flu shot actually confers any type of immunity to the patient.
CDC¡ÊÊÆ¹ñ¼ÀÉÂÂкöͽËÉ¥»¥ó¥¿¡¼¡Ë¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤ÆÊó¹ð¤µ¤ì¤¿Í¸úÀ¤Î³ä¹ç¡Ê¡ó¡Ë¤È¤Ï¡¢ËèǯºÇ¤â¤è¤¯Î®¹Ô¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶³ô¤È¡¢Ëèǯ¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Ç»ÈÍѤµ¤ì¤ë¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¡Ö¹³¸¶¡×¤È¤ò°ìÃפµ¤»¤ëǽÎϤ˴ð¤Å¤¤¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¤³¤ì¤Ï¡¢¼ÂºÝ¤Ë¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤¬´µ¼Ô¤ËÌȱ֤òÍ¿¤¨¤ë¤«¤É¤¦¤«¤ò¹Íθ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤»¤ó¡£
In fact, the prestigious Cochrane Review in 2014 stated that the flu vaccination ¡Èshows no appreciable effect on working days lost or hospitalization.¡É Moreover, out of an average of 71 individuals receiving the flu shot, only one case of the flu was prevented.
¼ÂºÝ¡¢2014ǯ¤Ë¹Ô¤ï¤ì¤¿ÃøÌ¾¤Ê¥³¥¯¥é¥ó¤ÎÄ´ºº¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥óÀܼï¤Ï¡¢Â»¼ºÆü¡ÊØí´µÆü¿ô¡Ë¤äÆþ±¡¤ËÂ礤ʱƶÁ¤òÍ¿¤¨¤Ê¤¤¤³¤È¤ò¼¨¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¤µ¤é¤Ë¡¢¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤ÎͽËÉÀܼï¤ò¼õ¤±¤¿Ê¿¶Ñ71¿Í¤Î¤¦¤Á¡¢¤¿¤Ã¤¿1¿Í¤Î¤ßͽËɤµ¤ì¤¿¤Ë¤¹¤®¤Þ¤»¤ó¡£
A big issue to consider, besides the lack of effectiveness of the flu shot, is the risk associated with receiving the vaccine, especially for pregnant women. In early this year, Zerbo et al. (2017 JAMA Pediatrics) published a paper showing that pregnant women receiving the seasonal flu shot in the first trimester of pregnancy had 25% greater odds of having a child with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤ÎÀܼï¤Ï¡¢Í¸úÀ¤Î·çÇ¡¤Ë²Ã¤¨¤Æ¡¢¹Íθ¤¹¤Ù¤Â礤ÊÌäÂê¤Ï¡¢ÆÃ¤ËÇ¥ÉØ¤Î¥ï¥¯¥Á¥óÀܼï¤Ë´ØÏ¢¤¹¤ë¥ê¥¹¥¯¤Ç¤¹¡£
º£Ç¯¤Î½é¤á¡¢¥¼¥ë¥ÜµÚ¤Ó¤½¤Î¾¡ÊJAMA Pediatrics¡Ë¡ÊÃ𣱡ˤǤϡ¢Ç¥¿±Âè1´ü¤Ëµ¨ÀáÀ¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤ÎÀܼï¤ò¼õ¤±¤¿Ç¥Éؤϡ¢¼«Êľɥ¹¥Ú¥¯¥È¥é¥à¾ã³²¡ÊASD¡Ë¤òͤ¹¤ë»Ò¶¡¤òͤ¹¤ë³ÎΨ¤¬25¡ó¹â¤«¤Ã¤¿¤È¤ÎÏÀʸ¤òÄ󼨸øÉ½¤·¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£
¡ÊÃ𣱡ËJAMA Pediatrics
ÊÆ¹ñ°å»Õ²ñ¤¬È¯¹Ô¤¹¤ëËè·î¤ÎººÆÉ¤ò¼õ¤±¤¿ °å³Ø»¨»ï¡£
¾®»ù²Ê¤Î¤¹¤Ù¤Æ¤Î¦Ì̤òÌÖÍ夷¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£
Although the authors of the paper tried to dismiss the finding, given their deep institutional conflicts of interest as employees of the insurance giant Kaiser Permanente, later rebuttals to the paper by me (Hooker et al. 2017 JAMA Pediatrics) and a medical research group in Italy (Donzelli et al. 2017 JAMA Pediatrics) demonstrated that the finding was indeed statistically significant.
¤³¤ÎÏÀʸ¤ÎÃø¼Ô¤¿¤Á¤Ï¡¢Êݸ±Âç¼ê¥«¥¤¥¶¡¼¡¦¥Ñ¡¼¥Þ¥Í¥ó¥Æ¤Î½¾¶È°÷¤È¤·¤Æ¤Î¿¼¤¤À©ÅÙŪ¤ÊÍø±×ÁêÈ¿¤ò¹Í¤¨¤ì¤Ð¡¢¤³¤Îȯ¸«¤ò¤ªÂ¢Æþ¤ê¤·¤è¤¦¤È¤·¤¿¤¬¡¢¤½¤Î¸å¡¢»ä¡ÊHooker et al 2017 JAMA Pediatrics¡Ë¤È¥¤¥¿¥ê¥¢¤Î°å³Ø¸¦µæ¥°¥ë¡¼¥×¡ÊDonzelli et al¡£2017 JAMA Pediatrics¡Ë¤ÎÏÀʸ¤Ø¤ÎÈ¿ÏÀ¤Ï¡¢¤½¤Îȯ¸«¤¬³Î¤«¤ËÅý·×Ū¤ËͰդǤ¢¤ë¤³¤È¤ò¼Â¾Ú¤·¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£
Even more alarming, the CDC just published a paper (Donahue et al. 2017 Vaccine) showing an increased risk of spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) in women receiving the seasonal flu shot during the 2010 through 2012 seasons. Although these vaccines carried the H1N1 antigen (for protection from Swine Flu) which is not used currently, the CDC could not rule out the fact that this association might exist in the type of seasonal flu vaccine distributed currently.
¤µ¤é¤Ë¶Ã¤¯¤Ù¤¤³¤È¤Ë¡¢CDC¤Ï¡¢2010ǯ¤«¤é2012ǯ¤Îµ¨Àá¤Ëµ¨ÀáÀ¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥óÀܼï¤ò¼õ¤±¤¿½÷À¤Î¼«È¯ÅªÎ®»º¤Î¥ê¥¹¥¯¤¬¹â¤¤¤³¤È¤ò¼¨¤¹ÏÀʸ¡ÊDonahue et al¡£2017 Vaccine¡Ë¤ò¸øÉ½¤·¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£
¤³¤ì¤é¤Î¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Ï¡¢¸½ºß»ÈÍѤµ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Ê¤¤H1N1¹³¸¶¡ÊÆÚ¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤«¤é¤ÎÊݸîÍѡˤòÊÝͤ·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤·¤¿¤¬¡¢CDC¤Ï¸½ºßÇÛÉÛ¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ëµ¨ÀáÀ¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Î¼ïÎà¤Ë¤³¤Î´ØÏ¢¡ÊH1N1¹³¸¶¢ªÎ®»º¡Ë¤¬Â¸ºß¤¹¤ë²ÄǽÀ¤òÇÓ½ü¤Ç¤¤Þ¤»¤ó¤Ç¤·¤¿¡£
Over this next ¡Èflu-shot season¡É, over 20 million of the influenza vaccines distributed will contain thimerosal, the mercury-laden preservative used in multidose vaccine formulations. This means that every adult, child, and infant receiving one of these flu shots will be exposed to 25 micrograms of mercury. Mercury in thimerosal has been linked to tics, speech delay, and language delay in children (Thompson et al. 2007 NEJM, Barile et al. 2013 J Pediatr Psychol, Verstraeten et al. 2003 Pediatrics, Andrews et al. 2004 Pediatrics) and many published studies also show a relationship with autism and ASD (Geier et al. 2013 Translational Neurodegeneration 2:25, among others). It¡Çs odd and unsettling that we warn pregnant women against tuna consumption because of mercury, but in contrast, allow them to get mercury containing flu shots. It has been well established that mercury from thimerosal selectively accumulates in the placenta and travels through cord blood to the developing fetus, who does not have any mechanism to detoxify heavy metals (Ablesohn et al. 2011 Canadian Family Physician 57:26).
¼¡¤Ë¡¢¡Ö¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¡¦¥·¡¼¥º¥ó¡×¤Ë¤Ï¡¢Î®¹Ô¤·¤¿¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó2ÀéËü°Ê¾å¤Ë¡¢Â¿ºÞ¥ï¥¯¥Á¥óÀ½ºÞ¤Ë»ÈÍѤµ¤ì¤ë¿å¶ä¤ò´Þ¤àËÉÉåºÞ¥Á¥á¥í¥µ¡¼¥ë¤¬´Þ¤Þ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
¤³¤ì¤Ï¡¢¤³¤ì¤é¤Î¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤Î1¤Ä¤Î¼ïÎà¤òÀܼ魯¤ëÁ´¤Æ¤ÎÀ®¿Í¡¢»Ò¶¡¡¢¤ª¤è¤ÓÍÄ»ù¤¬25¥Þ¥¤¥¯¥í¥°¥é¥à¤Î¿å¶ä¤ËÇø¤µ¤ì¤ë¤³¤È¤ò°ÕÌ£¤·¤Þ¤¹¡£
¥Á¥á¥í¥µ¡¼¥ë¤Î¿å¶ä¤Ï¡¢¾®»ù¤Î´éÌ̤±¤¤¤ì¤ó¡¢Óë²¼Ãٱ䡢¸À¸ìÃÙ±ä¤È´ØÏ¢¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¡ÊThompson¤é¡¢2007ǯNEJM¡¢Barile¤é¡¢2013 J Pediatr Psychol¡¢Verstraeten¤é¡¢2003 Pediatrics¡¢Andrews et al 2004 Pediatrics¡Ë
¸ø³«¤µ¤ì¤¿Â¿¤¯¤Î¸¦µæ¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¼«Êľɤª¤è¤ÓASD¡Ê³Ø½¬¾ã³²¡Ë¤È¤Î´Ø·¸¤â¼¨¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¡ÊGeier¤é¡¢2013 Translational Neurodegeneration¡ÊÃð£²¡Ë 2:25¡¢¤½¤Î¾¡Ë¡£
¡ÊÃ𣲡ËTranslational Neurodegeneration
¥Ñ¡¼¥¥ó¥½¥óɤ䥢¥ë¥Ä¥Ï¥¤¥Þ¡¼É¤ʤɤοÀ·ÐÊÑÀ¼À´µ¤ÎʬÌî¤ò¥«¥Ð¡¼¤¹¤ëººÆÉºÑ¤ß¤Î °å³Ø»¨»ï¡£
´ñ̯¤ÇÉ԰¤ʤ³¤È¤Ë¤Ï¡¢¥Þ¥°¥í¤Ë¤Ï¿å¶ä¤ò´Þ¤à¤È¤·¤Æ¥Þ¥°¥í¤Î¾ÃÈñ¤ËÂФ·¤ÆÇ¥Éؤ˷ٹð¤ò¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¤¬¡¢¤³¤ì¤È¤ÏÂоÈŪ¤Ë¡¢¿å¶ä´ÞͤΥ¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥óÀܼï¤Ç¿å¶ä¤òÂÎÆâ¤Ë¼è¤ê¹þ¤ó¤Ç¤·¤Þ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
¥Á¥á¥í¥µ¡¼¥ë¤Î¿å¶ä¤¬ÂÛÈפËÁªÂòŪ¤ËÃßÀѤ·¡¢¤½¤·¤Æ¡¢½Å¶â°¤ò²òÆÇ¤¹¤ë¥á¥«¥Ë¥º¥à¤¬¤Ê¤¤È¯Ã£Ãæ¤ÎÂÛ»ù¤ËçÁÂÓ·ì¤ò²ð¤·¤ÆÅÁ¤ï¤ë¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¤Ï³ÎΩ¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
(Ablesohn et al. 2011 Canadian Family Physician 57:26).
¡Ê°Ê²¼¸¶Ê¸°ìÉô¾Êά¡Ë
¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤ÎͽËÉÀܼï¤Ï¡¢¹âÎð¼Ô¤Ë¤âÆÃ¤Ë¿ä¾©¤µ¤ì¡¢»ÔÈΤµ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¤·¤«¤·¡¢¹âÎð¼Ô¤ËÂФ¹¤ë¥Á¥á¥í¥µ¡¼¥ë¤Î¸ú²Ì¤Ï¤Þ¤À¸¦µæ¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤»¤ó¡£
»ä¤¬CDC¤«¤é¼õ¤±¼è¤Ã¤¿¾ðÊó¤Ë¤è¤ë¤È¡¢µ¨ÀáÀ¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤Îȯɤ䥢¥ë¥Ä¥Ï¥¤¥Þ¡¼É¤ÎȯÀ¸Î¨¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¡¢±Ö³Ø¼Ô¤¬CDC¿¦°÷¤Ë¿å¶ä¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ë¸¦µæ¤òÄ󰯤·¤¿¤³¤È¤¬¼¨¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¤·¤«¤·¡¢CDC¤Î¥ê¡¼¥À¡¼¥·¥Ã¥×¤Ï¡¢Èà¤é¤¬¤½¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ê¸¦µæ¤ò¹Ô¤¦¤³¤È¤òµö¤·¤Þ¤»¤ó¤Ç¤·¤¿¡£
¤³¤ÎÌÜŪ¤Î¤¿¤á¤Ë¡¢Spaeth¡Ê¥¹¥Ñ¥¨¥¹¡Ë¤é¤Ë¤è¤ë°å³ØÊ¬Ìî¤Ë¤ª¤±¤ëÂåɽŪ¤Ê¥Ç¡¼¥¿¥Ù¡¼¥¹PubMed¡Ê¥Ñ¥Ö¥á¥É¡Ë¤«¤éÃê½Ð¤·¤¿1·ï¤Î¸¦µæ2012¡ÊJ Neurosci Res¡Ë¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¥Á¥á¥í¥µ¡¼¥ë¤Î»À²½ËɻߺîÍѤ¬¥¢¥ë¥Ä¥Ï¥¤¥Þ¡¼É¤ˤߤé¤ì¤ëºÙ˦À·ç»¤ò°ú¤µ¯¤³¤¹²ÄǽÀ¤¬¤¢¤ë¤³¤È¤ò¼¨º¶¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
¤·¤«¤·¡¢¿å¶ä˽Ϫ¤ÏÊ̤ÎÏäǤ¹¡£¿å¶ä¥¢¥Þ¥ë¥¬¥à½¼Å¶Êª¤Î¸ºß¤Ï¡¢¥¢¥ë¥Ä¥Ï¥¤¥Þ¡¼É¤Îȯ¾É¤ÈÁê´Ø¤¹¤ë¤³¤È¤¬¼¨¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤ª¤ê¡ÊSun¤é¡¢2015 Alzheimer Res Ther¡Ë¡¢¤µ¤é¤Ë¡¢¿å¶äÇøÏª¤ÏǾ¤Ë¤ª¤±¤ë¥¢¥ë¥Ä¥Ï¥¤¥Þ¡¼ÉÂ¥¢¥ß¥í¥¤¥ÉÈäθºß¤Ë´ØÏ¢¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¡ÊKim et al¡£ 2014 J Toxicol Sci¡£¡Ë¡£
¤·¤«¤·¡¢º£Æü¤Ç¤µ¤¨¡¢¥Á¥á¥í¥µ¡¼¥ë¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ëCDC¤Î¥¦¥§¥Ö¥µ¥¤¥È¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¡Ö°ÂÁ´¤Ê¿å¶ä¡×¤È¸Æ¤ó¤Ç¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¤³¤Îʪ¼Á¤Ï¡¢ÂΤ«¤é®¤ä¤«¤ËÇÓÝõ¤µ¤ì¤ë¤È¤µ¤ì¤Þ¤¹¤¬¡¢²Ê³Ø¤È°ìÃפ·¤Þ¤»¤ó¡£
Âå¤ï¤ê¤Ë¡¢¥¨¥Á¥ë¿å¶ä¡Ê˽Ϫ¸å¤Ë·ìÎ®Ãæ¤ò½Û´Ä¤¹¤ë¥Á¥á¥í¥µ¡¼¥ë¤Îʬ²òÀ¸À®Êª¡Ë¤ÏǾ¤ËÍ¢Á÷¤µ¤ì¡¢ËܼÁŪ¤ËǾ¤Ë±Êµ×¤Ë¸ÇÄꤵ¤ì¤¿¸µÁÇ¿å¶ä¡Ê»õ²ÊÍÑ¥¢¥Þ¥ë¥¬¥àÃæ¤Ë¸«¤é¤ì¤ë¿å¶ä¤Î¼ïÎà¡Ë¤ËÊÑ´¹¤µ¤ì¤Þ¤¹¡£¡ÊBurbacher et al¡£2005 Environ Health Perspectives¡Ë¡£
¤³¤Î»ö¼Â¤ò¹Í¤¨¤ë¤È¡¢¾¯¤Ê¤¯¤È¤â¡¢¿À·ÐÊÑÀ¼À´µ¤ËÈó¾ï¤ËÀȼå¤Ê¹âÎð¼Ô¤Ç¤Ï¡¢¤³¤Î¸ú²Ì¤ò¤µ¤é¤Ë¸¦µæ¤¹¤ëɬÍפ¬¤¢¤ê¤Þ¤¹¡£
Ultimately the decision to receive a flu shot is yours alone. I am a scientist, not a medical practitioner, and do not give medical advice, only present the scientific facts. That being said, I will not be receiving the influenza vaccine.
ºÇ½ªÅª¤Ë¤Ï¡¢¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¤ÎͽËÉÀܼï¤ò¼õ¤±¤ë¤È¤¤¤¦·èÄê¤Ï¤¢¤Ê¤¿¤À¤±¤Î¤â¤Î¤Ç¤¹¡£ »ä¤Ï°å»Õ¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯²Ê³Ø¼Ô¤Ç¤¢¤ê¡¢°å³ØÅª½õ¸À¤òÍ¿¤¨¤º¡¢²Ê³ØÅª»ö¼Â¤òÄ󼨤¹¤ë¤À¤±¤Ç¤¹¡£ ¤Ä¤Þ¤ê¡¢»ä¤Ï¥¤¥ó¥Õ¥ë¥¨¥ó¥¶¥ï¥¯¥Á¥ó¤ò¼õ¤±¼è¤ê¤Þ¤»¤ó¡£
¡Ê¸¶Ê¸¡Ë
Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
¥ï¥¯¥Á¥óͳ²»ö¾ÝÊó¹ð¥·¥¹¥Æ¥à¡ÊVAERS¡Ë
£í