|
It might have mortifying time by active democracy.
Maybe, Ronaldinho said, I have same.
Oh, yes. It's vibrant
(not active). lol
Date.March.25.2011
|
Today's News
[ リスト | 詳細 ]
コメント（0）
|
what do you worry about ?
what do the opponents conceal ?
what negotiation strategy do they use ?
Let us know by saying and bringing word more clearly !
Don't be deprived the qualification to fight up to one drop of the last blood !
US Bombing Raid Kills Three Journalists in Baghdad
Al Arabiya correspondent in Benghazi: Two hotels housing reporters were targeted by two bombs
|
|
一見すると公約違反。
しかし、その実体は、公約破棄。
通常裁判には、違法収集(例えば、程度を超えた拷問）により得た証拠)証拠排除法則が妥当する。
裁判で、9.11事件の真相が暴かれるわけではない。 政治（国防含む）とセットだ。
このことは、国防長官人事の連続性からも証される。
政治（国防）とセットという点では、グアナモンタナ基地での拷問による取調べと特別軍事法廷、以後の政治的解決というブッシュ共和党の意図と同じと推論される。
特別軍事法廷では、公開裁判では提出が控えられるであろう証拠資料をも判断の基礎として用いられる。
モスク建設問題で津波によりモノが言えなかったオバマは、連続した米大統領として、ブッシュ政権の意図した手段を用いて、正義を実現しようとしているのかも知れない。
It's violation of the promise to the nation on the face of things.
However, its substance is the destruction of it by himself.
The exclusionary rule on the illegal collection evidence rule on the ordinary court(trial).
The truth of the incident 9.11 are not exposed by the ordinary court.
It is a set with politics (including national-defense problem).
It is inferred that the intention of Republican Party Bush administration (
an investigation by torture in the Guantanamo base and a special military court)
is same in the point of a set with politics.
On a special military court, corroborative facts where submitting will be refrained are adopted as a base of judgment in the ordinary open court.
President Obama became to be not able to say anything on the Building Mosque Problem by Tsunami (including the emotion wave made by the misuse of world defense system).
He may make "Justice" come true with also using the means that Bush administration intended. I am absolutely convinced that a special military court will be subject to the most exacting demands of justice. Yes, we can !
November 13, 2009
Remarks by President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama of Japan in Joint Press Conference
Kantei, Tokyo, Japan
This is the Tsunami's example. lol
|
|
Which liberalism (give priority on the freedom and responsibility) or democracy (tracing the process of frank debate and compromise) is early for accomplishing the purpose "Justice"?
|
|
メディアへの攻撃に付いてはよく分かった。
北朝鮮も同じ方法を採ることがある。
しかも、電磁兵器を用いて。
イラク戦争の時に、米戦車がホテルの米メディア記者に砲弾を撃ち込んだ様子がＴＶ報道されたが、懲りないメディアがいたのかも知れない。
しかし、住宅地への攻撃に付いて、報道からは伝わって来ない。
仮に軍律違反があった場合には、身内の処罰を自主的に行なえるかどうかに付いても問われている。
さらに、電磁兵器の悪用や公安調査の名目での犯罪を含む組織犯罪に対する責任追及のための情報交換に付いても進めるべきだ。
これは、話が壊れない様に一般にアピアランスされなくて良い。
しかし、カダフィ大佐は、政権に残って、何をやり遂げたいのかを、出来ればテレビで明確にメッセージを出すべきだ。
政権交代の話など、その後だ。
It has understood well on the attack to media.
Occasionally, North Korea also adopt the same expedient.
And, electromagnetic-weapon are used.
TV was reported to the appearance where the U.S. tank shot the cannonball into the U.S. media journalist at the hotel on Iraq War.
There might be the media not learnt by experience.
However, the real thought is not transmitted from the media-report on
the attack to the residential quarter.
It is matter whether it is possible to punish independently if there is a violation of the military restrain by the relative.
In addition, it is necessary to advance the information exchange for the responsibility pursue to the organized crime including the crime in the pretext of the public peace investigation and the misuse of electromagnetic weapon.
As for this, the appearance need not be done to general so that the consent should not be broken.
If possible, Mr.colonel Gaddafi should remain in the political power, and give the message on the television clearly about what he want to do.
The story on the change of power is subsequent. |
