以下の内容は私と韓国人のJunさんのやり取りの内容です。
今回は全部で４つのコメントを一気に紹介します。
Dear Jun and many Korean friends
【18】 Fukuyama, 2005/04/06 02:06
I respect that you have a strong Korean identity.
I do not have such a strong identity.
I can give you some advice.
You may be able to change Japanese politics.
To do so, write an article to JANJAN in proper way.
That means many Japanese can know what is the problem from your point of view.
We can elect Japanese politician.
If you want, I can give some more advice.
Let's move constructively.
Thanks
【19】 Jun, 2005/04/06 03:01
Unfortunately, I can not speak Japanese.
If you agree with me (at least partially), I strongly ask you to do me a favor to share the 'hidden' facts with japanese.
Because first, actually this issue was initially set up by japanese politicians.
second, it's japanese people who are supposed to influence their politicians before it gets up to an international level.
Currently, I am a student at London School of Economics in UK and I am doing my best to have discussions with other students including those from europe, america and china. Not most of them, but 'all of them' agrees with my idea after a decent discussion. There are literally tons of materials and resources which proves Dok do belongs to Korea. Just too many of them to deny.
Before Japan gets a worse reputation about this issue, it's quite urgent for japanese people to stop their politicians.
You are welcome!
Fukuyama, 2005/04/06 08:07
I know that the editorial department of JANJAN translate from Korean or English into Japanese.
So, I think you can submit your article in either language (Korean or English).
I think you do not have to write in Japanese.
But I recommend that before you submit an article to JANJAN, you should contact them to secure about this.
By the way, I am not sure that your story is true, because you have not showed me URL of certain intelligence that International Court of Justice can not give an eminently fair decision.
However I must say again...
It doesn't matter to me whether the disputed islands belongs to Japan or not.
I am looking toward our future developments.
That is the point.
JANJAN
http://www.janjan.jp/
This article
http://www.janjan.jp/world/0504/0503315194/1.php
Editorial department e-mail address
edit@janjan.jp
Here we go again.
Jun, 2005/04/06 09:30
You said, "I am not sure that your story is true, because you have not showed me URL of certain intelligence that International Court of Justice can not give an eminently fair decision.
However I must say again...
It doesn't matter to me whether the disputed islands
belongs to Japan or not."
I mentioned it at the end of the article. Search! Omni Amni News of MBC. 'must be round March' I said!
Seems like you are not listening at all. You are just maintaining the ignorant and indifferent attitude-a typical attitude of japanese- by saying 'it doesn't matter to me'
As I said earlier, it's always Japanese politicians who starts all this kind of conflicts; about history, territory etc. and they pretend to step back as if they are not interested when the corresponding nation rebuts. So Absurd!!
You, as a citizen of Japan, show some kind of responsibility for your representitives at least. Don't always ask somebody else to handle those imperialists.
I think you and japanese people should search for ubiqutous facts which tells Dokdo belongs to Korea. It not that hard. Korea even donated hundreds of pieces of maps which shows Dokdo as a Korean territory (made by France, Korea, even Japan and many other nations)to Tokyo Museum. (which they refused to receive at first because they were afraid to receive the truth. Shame of Japanese for this fact.)They received it later, so they should have tons of materials which proves my arguement. go and check it out.
And one more thing. I don't have a strong korean identity either. It got nothing to do with this.
I'm just fad up with Japanese imperialists and those ignorant & indifferent people.
私はJunさんが日本人にどうやったら自分の考えを納得してもらえるか、自発的に考えて欲しかったので、インタネット新聞JANJANに記事を投稿してみたらどうかと提案してみました。
ただ、私の書き方が悪かったせいか、Junさんはかなり怒ってしまいました。
Junさんはロンドンで経済学を学んでいる学生で、周りの友達に色々竹島の話をして韓国の領土だと主張しているようです。
私はアメリカに住んでいますが、アメリカ人に竹島や尖閣諸島が日本の領土と主張したことはないです。
（日本政府の見解として説明したことは、あります。）
北方領土については、「本当は日本の領土なんだけど…」と話をしたことがあります。
韓国人にとっては北方領土のような感覚に近いものがあり、裁判をやる必要がないと思っているようですね。
今回は特に重要なポイントはないと思うのであまり和訳に力を入れても仕方がないと思いました。
というのは、単なる言い訳で本当はすごく忙しいというのが1番の理由です。
次回はいよいよ竹島論争シリーズの最終回にしたいと思います。
|
2019
おぉ！とうとう次が最終回ですか！ 御忙しいのに、お疲れ様です。 無理なさらないよう、のんびりどうぞ！
2005/4/23(土) 午後 1:58 [ sym**thy008*3 ]
ふくやま様、いつもありがとうございます☆今回は、英文を拾い読みですが、読ませていただきました。ふくやまさんの紳士的な文に対して、Junさんの攻撃的な文のコントラストが、まさに「論戦」という名にふさわしいですね！
2005/4/24(日) 午後 8:39 [ - ]
鮎川様、こんにちは。はい、無理はしないようにして頑張ります。（笑）
2005/4/28(木) 午前 10:55
ため吉様、ありがとうございます。私は昔JANJANコロシアムという場所で色々な方たちと討論した経験があり、そこで皆様に鍛えてもらいました。それでもまだ発展途上なので相手を不愉快にさせてしまうこともあり、自己嫌悪を感じることもたまにあります。どうすれば、もっとうまく議論ができるか研究中なので何か気付いたら教えて下さい。では、また。
2005/4/28(木) 午前 10:56