韓国人から見た竹島問題

今日は記事を一つ、皆様にご紹介します。

South Koreans vent fury at Japan

BBC NEWS
Friday, 18 March, 2005

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4361343.stm

Visitors to South Korea could be forgiven for thinking the country was on the verge of war.

Newspaper headlines accuse Japan of a new invasion for claiming sovereignty over a cluster of disputed islands.
Overwhelmed by fury, protesters have sliced off fingers, set themselves on fire, and in one case committed suicide by jumping off a bridge.
War, of course, is out of the question. Japan and South Korea are close economic partners and have enjoyed much improved relations in recent years. This year marks the 40th anniversary of diplomatic ties, and there were hopes that memories of Japan's brutal 1910-1945 colonisation of Korea were gradually fading.
But South Koreans are caught up in a spasm of nationalist rage, triggered by what they see as the chutzpah of a former aggressor.
"I can't understand why the Japanese are claiming the islands now when they've been controlled by us for so long. It's as if they want to go back in history and re-colonise Korea," said Park Sung-sok, a local councillor, who came with his colleagues to protest outside the Japanese embassy.
He was with one of scores of groups - from historians to former commandos - who have marched to the Japanese embassy to vent their anger.
"We see it as much more serious than the North Korean nuclear threat," said another protester, Kim Hong-chol, echoing a common sentiment here.
"We're the same people as the North Koreans and we can solve that among ourselves. But Japan is a different country and it's attacked us several times in the past," he said.

Barren rocks

The dispute over Dokdo, or Takeshima as the islands are known in Japan, is a perennial irritant to better relations.
The islands are remote and uninhabited, lying about half way between the two countries.
But they sit among rich fishing grounds and there is much talk of potential gas deposits in the area.
The dispute flared up again when the Japanese ambassador to South Korea restated Tokyo's historical and legal claim at a news conference in Seoul.
Korean anger reached fever pitch when the Japanese prefecture of Shimane passed a bill commemorating the centenary of its formal inclusion of the islands in 1905, the same year Japan began to consolidate its colonial rule over the Korean peninsula.
The South Korean government says Japan's moves are seriously damaging friendly relations between the two countries.
"This is not simply a territorial issue, but is nothing short of a denial of the history of our national liberation as well as a justification of past aggression," said the chairman of the National Security council, Chung Dong-young.
South Korea says it will take measures to reinforce its control of the islands, which are currently occupied by a detachment of marine police.
It is also demanding what it calls "genuine reflection and an apology" for Japan's past colonial rule.
The row looks like a big set-back to efforts to promote better regional co-operation and understanding, even though South Korea says it wants to continue to promote friendly ties.
"Relations are very fragile in this region and historical disputes are the toughest challenge we face," says Rhee Jung-ho of the Presidential Committee on Northeast Asian Co-operation.
He was referring not just to relations with Japan, but also to an emotional, historical row with China, which is also seen to be chipping away at Korean sovereignty.
Governments in the region talk much about the need for economic integration and co-operation.
But old rivalries from the past increasingly haunt the present.
The giants in the neighbourhood, China and Japan, are sizing each other up with old scores to settle. South Korea is caught uncomfortably in the middle.

この記事では韓国人のコメントがあります。
"We see it as much more serious than the North Korean nuclear threat," said another protester, Kim Hong-chol, echoing a common sentiment here.
"We're the same people as the North Koreans and we can solve that among ourselves. But Japan is a different country and it's attacked us several times in the past," he said.
これには、ちょっと戸惑いを日本人としては感じます。
なんで北朝鮮の核問題よりも竹島問題の方が重大な問題なの？と思いました。

なんか、記事中に「But South Koreans are caught up in a spasm of nationalist rage, triggered by what they see as the chutzpah of a former aggressor.」と書いてあるのが、よくわかります。
「ナショナリストの激怒の発作」って表現は、なかなかだと思いました。

で結局、「"This is not simply a territorial issue, but is nothing short of a denial of the history of our national liberation as well as a justification of past aggression," said the chairman of the National Security council, Chung Dong-young.」というのが韓国人の見方なのかな、と思いました。

"Relations are very fragile in this region and historical disputes are the toughest challenge we face," says Rhee Jung-ho of the Presidential Committee on Northeast Asian Co-operation.という見方もありますね。

愛国心が強すぎると問題だなと私は思っ

[sad*ot*muk*i]

英語が分からないので、よくわかりませんが、竹島は江戸時代にはすでに日本の領土だったらしいです。それと、韓国が竹島を領土だと主張し始めたのは、終戦後からだそうです。つまり、日本の侵略と竹島には何も関係がないようです。

記事が勝手に切れてしまうので修正しようと何回もトライしたのですが、だめでした。以下、続きを掲載します。

愛国心が強すぎると問題だなと私は思っていますが、最後の「The giants in the neighbourhood, China and Japan, are sizing each other up with old scores to settle. South Korea is caught uncomfortably in the middle.」という部分は少し理解できる気がします。日韓が仲良くなれるよう願いながら私たちが韓国人の知り合いと上手に付き合わないといけないと私は思いました。

sadaotomukai様、こんにちは。前回の記事も参照して頂きたいと思います。日本の言い分は私も知っています。この記事によると韓国人から見たらこの問題はただの領土問題ではなく、再び日本が韓国を侵略しようと考えている陰謀だ、と誤解している人もいるようです。

[ron**n_87*7]

コメントありがとう。英語は読むのに時間がかかるし、よくわかっているかも不安なんですが、この怒りの有様は愛国心というよりは気質的なものではないかと感じました。それと私は行動できないので、情報が楽しみで す。私のブログで紹介しておきます。

[eb8*59*]

日本が韓国を侵略した、ということからズレてると思う。韓国の独立があの状況でありえたのか、日露戦争の理由をブーア戦に求めることも可能ですが、何より当時の朝鮮の存在意義に端を発したんじゃないかな。「侵略」はひどい解釈だと思う。それがスタンダードだとしても。

ronbun_8787様、eb80597様、こんにちは。韓国に対してどう付き合うか、難しい問題ですね。今回、私からは問題提起しかできませんでしたが、やれることがあるか、ゆっくりと考えてみます。