|
Submission to ASSC 2007 - Apr 10 -
April 10, 2007, 2:55 AM
To: ASSC 2007 Secretariat,
I thank you very much for your kind reply to my trivial looking message. I also apologize for the late response. Now I send you some abstract asking which session you think proper to contribute. One thing I must mention is, the fact I haven't published any book yet. The situation is like following. In Japan, many publishers are facing the big risk of success or failure. Therefore, I have almost given up publishing in Japanese. Now I'm writing a book in English. Because of the cultural difference, it's not easy to convey my thoughts properly in English. Now I have a couple of friends who are native English speakers. Please read this abstract carefully and let me know your idea so that I will be able to plan and go further.
It is quite natural to become nervous and uneasy whenever we enter into unfamiliar field and meet new concept. We feel some difficulty to understand it, because we don't have enough knowledge and cannot recognize it. Instead, we feel it easy to understand even new concept in the familiar fields. For example, "Define time! Can you explain the concept of time?" This question is not easy to answer, even though time is very much familiar in our daily life. More examples are, "Define spirit, define soul, define mind, etc." Thus, we may be led to next question, "Why can we use these ambiguous words in the daily conversations?" The answer is simple, kind of excuse. "It’s because nobody gets in trouble." This sounds plausible, but mathematically something is wrong. Why?
Title: Brain Mechanisms to generate ConsciousnessPractically nothing was known about the brain mechanism except the neural network. Neither was about thinking mechanism as well. This looks very odd, for I can say I was thinking of you, isn't it? Why we cannot explain what we are doing when we are thinking? I mean, we are forgetting to think of ourselves when we are concentrating into something or being absorbed. This was the biggest puzzle I have ever had. Probably you have heard of hidden consciousness. What is consciousness at all? Can you define it? There are a couple of pretty big conferences in the world and people have been discussing about it for many years. Unfortunately, they are not only amateur scientists who are not familiar to physics nor mathematics, and cannot argue scientifically, but also apt to be exclusive to protect their pride. Eventually, I have succeeded to construct a theory to explain the brain mechanism and thinking mechanism as well. Then I completed the manuscript for a book to publish. However, it turned out that most of the people cannot understand it. I found serious problem there. Most people are no good in linguistics, physics, mathematics, probability theory and semantics. It seems to me the policy of education to separate the science course and the others is wrong. This has become conspicuous recently when people began to think of the consciousness. After knowing the tricky mechanisms of the brain, I have been trying to apply my theory to almost everything in almost every field. It turned out that the theory is applicable to everything. Now I am thinking to design conceptually the artificial brain that is supposed to have some intelligence. Of course, there are some hypothetical assumptions that are not easy to prove at present. On this occasion, I'd like to present my theory and discuss with many researchers in the point of view to create the humanoid, the robot that has brain similar to the human brain.
Sincerely yours,
Katsuo Hasegawa
Presenter: Katsuo Hasegawa, PhD, Affiliation: The late Professor of Nagoya University, Graduate School of Mathematics [Contents] 1. Introduction 2. DNA mechanism – New aspects of genome interpretation – 3. Body construction mechanism – Founder and organization syndicate – 4. Brain construction mechanism – Origin of autonomic nervous system – 5. Consciousness mechanism – Origin of consciousness and subconsciousness – 6. Summary |
Conference
[ リスト | 詳細 ]
This corner is prepared for any convenience to inform some conferences.(http://homepage2.nifty.com/prohits)
全1ページ
[1]
|
Submission to WMSCI 2007
April 10, 2007, 2:55 AM
To: WMSCI 2007 Secretariat,
I thank you very much for your kind reply to my trivial looking message. I also apologize for the late response. Now I send you some abstract asking which session you think proper to contribute. One thing I must mention is, the fact I haven't published any book yet. The situation is like following. In Japan, many publishers are facing the big risk of success or failure. Therefore, I have almost given up publishing in Japanese. Now I'm writing a book in English. Because of the cultural difference, it's not easy to convey my thoughts properly in English. Now I have a couple of friends who are native English speakers. Please read this abstract carefully and let me know your idea so that I will be able to plan and go further.
It is quite natural to become nervous and uneasy whenever we enter into unfamiliar field and meet new concept. We feel some difficulty to understand it, because we don't have enough knowledge and cannot recognize it. Instead, we feel it easy to understand even new concept in the familiar fields. For example, "Define time! Can you explain the concept of time?" This question is not easy to answer, even though time is very much familiar in our daily life. More examples are, "Define spirit, define soul, define mind, etc." Thus, we may be led to next question, "Why can we use these ambiguous words in the daily conversations?" The answer is simple, kind of excuse. "It’s because nobody gets in trouble." This sounds plausible, but mathematically something is wrong. Why?
Title: Brain Mechanisms and Feasibility to Create HumanoidPractically nothing was known about the brain mechanism except the neural network. Neither was about thinking mechanism as well. This looks very odd, for I can say I was thinking of you, isn't it? Why we cannot explain what we are doing when we are thinking? I mean, we are forgetting to think of ourselves when we are concentrating into something or being absorbed. This was the biggest puzzle I have ever had. Probably you have heard of hidden consciousness. What is consciousness at all? Can you define it? There are a couple of pretty big conferences in the world and people have been discussing about it for many years. Unfortunately, they are not only amateur scientists who are not familiar to physics nor mathematics, and cannot argue scientifically, but also apt to be exclusive to protect their pride. Eventually, I have succeeded to construct a theory to explain the brain mechanism and thinking mechanism as well. Then I completed the manuscript for a book to publish. However, it turned out that most of the people cannot understand it. I found serious problem there. Most people are no good in linguistics, physics, mathematics, probability theory and semantics. It seems to me the policy of education to separate the science course and the others is wrong. This has become conspicuous recently when people began to think of the consciousness. After knowing the tricky mechanisms of the brain, I have been trying to apply my theory to almost everything in almost every field. It turned out that the theory is applicable to everything. Now I am thinking to design conceptually the artificial brain that is supposed to have some intelligence. Of course, there are some hypothetical assumptions that are not easy to prove at present. On this occasion, I'd like to present my theory and discuss with many researchers in the point of view to create the humanoid, the robot that has brain similar to the human brain.
Sincerely yours,
Katsuo Hasegawa
Presenter: Katsuo Hasegawa, PhD. Affiliation: The late Professor of Nagoya University, Graduate School of Mathematics [Contents] 1. Introduction 2. DNA mechanism – New aspects of genome interpretation – 3. Body construction mechanism – Founder and organization syndicate – 4. Brain mechanism – Origin of autonomic nervous system and hidden awareness – 5. Thinking mechanism – Master-Slave system and crucial role of Corpus Callosum – 6. Feasibility to create AI – Systemic brain science and technology – 7. Summary Sessions 2 and 3 can be skipped in case of short presentation. |
全1ページ
[1]



