脳と心、物理、数学そして音楽、健康、癒し、スポーツの科学

2.No response has important meaning -After one years from the post-

2. No response has important meaning -After one years from the last post-

　　　　　 　　　　　　 Thursday, August 7, 2008

1. Introduction -On the Hiroshima Memorial Day-

Since I wrote the first proposal, almost one year and a half have passed. I found no response at all. I have read it again and again, finding I was agitating people there for the world peace. I considered how I should think of this result. Nobody cares this blog, is one answer. Nobody can understand what I wrote, is another one.
On the occasion of the Hiroshima Memorial Day, I'd like to retry some agitation again using little bit different linguistics. Although I know anything I write can be ignored or neglected, I like to dream some response. Even no response, I think, shows some meaning like the neuron's response.

2. Preferences of words -Are the words belonging to whom?-

The U.K. was at least once occupied and governed by French nobles. I'd guess people then were tortured to speak different language. But people were wise enough taking hierarchical language structure. The serebrities spoke French and the common folks spoke revised English. I can apply my research results to linguistics, people can be affected by the government, especially in thinking style based on the contemporary language system.
Most of discoveries in technology were carried out in competitions. The wars can be regarded as the large scale competitions of military powers. A silly quarell among young kids is smallest scale one. My question is how many people like the war.

3. Politicians are greater leaders than scientists -Why?-

I's raise another question. Who is hypocrite in the world? Old Japanese military force consisted of Japanese who were agitated by the Americans as two-faced folks. Who made the campain? I insist anybody is two-faced. I'd like to answer to why. Because, like any animals, all livings can survive on the basis of two-facedness!
You have the brain. It includes billions of neurons. Who made them? Various organs made neurons. When people become to think? At what age? How? Why you have two eyes, two ears, two arms, two leggs? Is the number of two necessary? Who can answer them? Whose roll to answer?
We are living in the most advanced civilized society in the history. Many communist nations have disappeared. There are still some tyranny, autocratic nations. The democracy looks prevailing and people think free. The main reason is that we can choose freely our occupation just because of the division of labor. You can be politicians and be political leaders. Is it misunderstanding?

4. Key is instinctive self-protection of animals -Reasonable reason!-

Predominate people would make no objection if I say the survival power is instinctive self-protection of animals. They would not like to think they might be going to sacrifice themselves, for only minor people kill themselves. I'd like to remind you we are all not different with animals, though I know people hate to hear it.
Civilization compells people not to think it, for the society is based on the basic concept of the "culture of shame" that is the front face. You want to say you have no other face? Sorry, my conclusion is everybody, everything in the universe is two-faced. And the number of two is enough. You can make up your face multi-faced if you accept two-faced.

5. Hope and Dream against destiny

Can we have hope? Just a simple dream? What is the desitiny? Does the democracy have no pit hole? You cannot suppose it before becoming to a sacifice, can you? I wonder it's good to enlighten people from my research survey and should hide my results away from the public. (To be continued)

（Keywords Peace Terrolism Destiny）

1. How to consider temper - Murder, terrorism, war and peace, are they common? -

1. How to consider temper - Murder, terrorism, war and peace, are they common? -
Wednesday, April 18, 2008

Two murders happened in US and Japan, while we do not have almost a simgle day to see no terrorism in Iraq or other countries. Since I am thinking how to create a humanoid that is a robot having the intelligent brain after knowing the brain mechanisms. I feel the intrinsic pressure from the theory to answer to any question about the mentality. That is why I started my manuscripts with linguistics in order to convey my thought for the readers to understand. Gradually I had to recognize a simple fact that people have a critical time like kittens to have an interest to something.

According to the famous experiment carried out by Huber and Wiezel, the kittens cannnot extend their visual sensory system with no input of specific patterns at the very critical time a few days after the birth for only a couple of days. Similar situations happen on human babies. Some Japanese aphthalmologists, i.e. the eye specialists, together with Wiezel, investigated those babies who suffered the revearse eyelashes and had operations at some specific time after the birth and found some of them to suffer weak eyesight, amblyopia, later who had their eyes blocked to the input light with patches over their eyes.

We, at least myself, already learned that we have the principal and primordial personality that are hidden as subconsciousness under the consciousness, which is awareness of the secondary and subjective personality. Most tricky and unbelievable fact is just here. I have been trying to convey this tricky mechanism to the people who read my blog. I found there were lots of new concepts when I wrote. I had to study linguistics. Eventually I reached new semantics wich underlies the linguistics and is culturally retarded field. We cannot catch up the language in our lives for it is accumulated on the long history.

It looks the destiny not to be able to understand new concepts after establishment of personality. I should say there is some mechanism to block our curiosity not to expand to diverge. It seems to me people are to limit themselves in some special field. I am reminded an old marchal art master who used two swords using two hands and was ambidextrous. My theory was entitled "Two-Faced Theory" and I knew two-facedness not good concept just like ambidexterity. Are they connected having something common?
My answer is yes.(to be continued)

Opening address of the new corner

Opening address of the new corner

My awareness told me I might have no time in this risky society. Wherever I want to go, there is a risk of traffic accident with pretty high probability. Actually I hage three or four times of serious accident experiences. Now I have a severe pain around my cervical (neck) vertebrae and recently I am sensitive when the low atomospheric pressure area comes closer. I can't help myself falling into depression. Even though I established new theory for the brain mechanisms, it is not easy to convey my thought to those people who are not curious enough to learn new things.
I got an idea to present it in some international conferences. I have already submitted the proposal to some conferences. But there is no guarantee to be accepted at all. Sometimes I feel some kind of hostility from those who have the established religion or ideology. I found there is no retreat after publication so that I would like to prepare my escape in advance. The two-faced theory gave me this idea of excuse.
I would like to open the discussions and arguments on this stage based on the theory so that anybody can read and criticize them, for any political decision can have two faces and even democracy has weak points just like science has. I know most of the people will be declined to join the discussions though they like to be observers. The instinct to protect my own self forces me to open this blog, and similarly it does people to hesitate and think it pride. We are living in the society of "culture of shame" where everything is hidden in the privacy including political consultations and coalitions.
Please feel free and enjoy the discussions which may become somewhat self-satisfied way of thinking again. If you should think yourself encouraged, try to work off your frustration by means of writing a contribution which is most welcome.