5. I want to recommend to use another DecompositionFor example, from Wikipedia Helmholtz DecompositionLet F be a vector field on a bounded domain V in R3, which is twice continuously differentiable. Then F can be decomposed into a curl-free component and a divergence-free component
We sometime use weather map to do meteorological analysis.
It belongs in R2, that is an analysis in the plane. And many meteorological analyst applys Helmholtz decomposition theorem in this weather map belonging in R2.
But, we can see many discontinuity lines in the isobalic weather map as shown in Fig5.1.
In these area, I think there are many matters to apply Helmholtz Decomposition.
And I have already proved that Helmholtz Decomposition is mathematically wrong in
chapter 2.
There is another way to decompose any flow without any matters. And it is very similar
to Helmholtz Decomposition in the sence that it devices into solenoidal component and another component which has divergent component.
Below are qaoted from http://nsidc.org/arcticmet/glossary/geostrophic_winds.html Geostrophic wind Theoretical wind which results from the equilibrium between horizontal components of the pressure gradient force and the Coriolis force (deviating force) above the friction layer. Only these two forces (no frictional force) are supposed to act on the moving air. It blows parallel to straight isobars or contours. Below are qaoted from http://jp.termwiki.com/EN:ageostrophic_wind The vector difference between the real (or observed) wind and the geostrophic wind, that is, uag = u − ug. Sometimes the magnitude of this vector difference is meant.
This decomposition has not any matter at all.It is just applied to basic vector difference.
Helmholtz Decomposition demands that the wind must be continuous. But this decomposition
does not demand it. At any point, the wind can be decided, but it must not be continuous in the plane.
And according to a definition, geostrophic winds blow in a parallel direction with a
inversely proportional to interval of contours . The contour of geopotential are supposed
to be continuous. So geostrophic winds are supposed to be continuous, and solenoidal
winds. Contours of geopotential looks like stream function from Helmholtz Decomposition theorem.
Actually, we can see that the contour are similar to stream function. For example,
I show the weather map at 12Z on July 31 in 2011 inFig.5.4.
Meanwhile, ageostrophic wind is the vector which is the rest after substructing geostrophic
wind from the actual wind. And actual wind blows nearly geostrophic motion. So, ageostrophic
wind is generaly small, but it has all divergent component.
velocity potential.
So, ageostrophic wind is similar to divergent wind from Helmholtz Decomposition theorem.
Fig5.6 shows the similarities between ageostrophic wind and divergent wind driven from
By this decomposition, ageostrophic wind has all of divergence component of actual(or
analysis) wind. And divergent wind is supposed to have all of divergence too. So, The distributions of divergence from both ageostrophic wind and divergent wind are supposed to be same.
Fig5.7 shows two distributions from two types of wind.
These divergent distributions are drawn on the water vapor imagery. The plus divergence
of the upper layer are closely-linked to clouds, and minus divergence( convergence) are closely-linked to black area.
Whichever wind you choose to calculate the distribution of divergent, you can get almost
the same consquence.
But if you choose the divergent wind from Helmholtz Decomposition, it is the end. If you choose ageostrophic wind, you can go more.
continue |
全体表示
[ リスト ]



